Cleaned up skeleton?

[Jan Schiefer]

Just a very, very vague question:
When can the public exspect access to a ( surely very leaky ) cleaned up
skeleton of ROS?

I mean that we have a running system, without the unchecked ( unclean )
components, so that people can start working again on the clean code.

For example: We can boot and explorer pops up. Nothing more. So we can
fix bugs in NTOSKRNL, FREELDR and EXPLORER...

Greetings,
Jan Schiefer

[TwoTailedFox]

I still have a working ROS copy via my old Trunk directory, but I
assume that's more than worthless now.

On 1/28/06, Jan Schiefer [e-mail] wrote:
> Just a very, very vague question:
> When can the public exspect access to a ( surely very leaky ) cleaned up
> skeleton of ROS?
>
> I mean that we have a running system, without the unchecked ( unclean )
> components, so that people can start working again on the clean code.
>
> For example: We can boot and explorer pops up. Nothing more. So we can
> fix bugs in NTOSKRNL, FREELDR and EXPLORER...
>
> Greetings,
> Jan Schiefer
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"

[Jonathan Wilson]

As far as I know, there is suspect code even in NTOSKRNL, HAL and the 
low-level components.

[Jan Schiefer]

Jonathan Wilson schrieb:
> As far as I know, there is suspect code even in NTOSKRNL, HAL and the
> low-level components.

Arghl...however I think cleaning up the very basic components is most
important.

It may be a psycological effect, but if you have at least something very
basic running, you can show that ROS is not entirely dead and that
progress is being made...

ROS is maybe one of the most ambitious open source projects, and
shouldn't go to coma or even die.

Greetings,
Jan Schiefer!