Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cfinck] 31298: Revert 31292, 31294 and 31297. Every change I try for fixing the build in one component breaks the build for another component. winebuild wasn't synchronized completely to the Wine version anyway, and the current Wine

[Aleksey Bragin]

I merged it, taking in account winebuild's changes (using output()  
function for example), so in 31300 it seems to work correctly.

I didn't really understood that AJ's message - Wine does not need  
stubs as stubbed functions at all, but rather want all of them to be  
manually implemented in a standalone .c file as stubs? or?

WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.

On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 6:36 PM,  [e-mail] wrote:
> > Every change I try for fixing the build in one component breaks  
> > the build for another component.
> > winebuild wasn't synchronized completely to the Wine version  
> > anyway, and the current Wine version removed support for the -- 
> > pedll option we use, so a full clean sync isn't possible.
>
> Can you merge the --pedll patch up to the trunk rather than reverting?
> You might want to comment out the stubs anyway or add real stubs and
> submit them to wine as per Alexandre's rejection of the patch by GvG
>
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2004-December/031978.html
> Thanks
>
> Steven Edwards
>
> "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
> that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo