msafd headers

[Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin]

Hi All!
Files on reactos/lib/msafd/misc/ uses header "msafd.h" from 
reactos/lib/msafd/. On my system, MinGW/linux successfully compiled 
these files ONLY after I manually corrected include directive:
#include <../msafd.h>
instead
#include <msafd.h>
in all 5 *.c files in reactos/lib/msafd/misc/.
Maybe we must make this replacement in svn tree? Or it was my 
misconfiguration? ;)

WBR,
  DarkHobbit

[WaxDragon]

I have had no problems building msafd under linux.

On 9/13/05, Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi All!
> Files on reactos/lib/msafd/misc/ uses header "msafd.h" from
> reactos/lib/msafd/. On my system, MinGW/linux successfully compiled
> these files ONLY after I manually corrected include directive:
> #include <../msafd.h>
> instead
> #include <msafd.h>
> in all 5 *.c files in reactos/lib/msafd/misc/.
> Maybe we must make this replacement in svn tree? Or it was my
> misconfiguration? ;)
>
> WBR,
>   DarkHobbit
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- 
#irc.freenode.net #reactos
01:03PM <filip2307> i don't know about any bug
01:04PM <filip2307> none exist
01:04PM <filip2307> ReactOS is prefect

[Filip Navara]

My rough guess is that it's combination of wrong include path (in ROS 
build files) and non-PCH compiler (ie. GCC < 3.4).

- Filip

WaxDragon wrote:
> I have had no problems building msafd under linux.
>
> On 9/13/05, Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin [e-mail] wrote:
> > Hi All!
> > Files on reactos/lib/msafd/misc/ uses header "msafd.h" from
> > reactos/lib/msafd/. On my system, MinGW/linux successfully compiled
> > these files ONLY after I manually corrected include directive:
> > #include <../msafd.h>
> > instead
> > #include <msafd.h>
> > in all 5 *.c files in reactos/lib/msafd/misc/.
> > Maybe we must make this replacement in svn tree? Or it was my
> > misconfiguration? ;)
> >
> > WBR,
> >  DarkHobbit
> >
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin]

Filip Navara :
> My rough guess is that it's combination of wrong include path (in ROS 
> build files) and non-PCH compiler (ie. GCC < 3.4).

Maybe, yes, thanks, but I used latest (2 month ago) mingw-gcc 3.4.x (now 
I'm writing from other computer, at work, and not remember third version 
digit, sorry).
Filip, what did you mean under "ROS build files"? *.c sources from my 
messages?
If yes - it will be Perhaps, better, to correct sources as I wrote to 
provide compilation not only under PCH compilers?

WBR,
  DarkHobbit