Re: [ros-diffs] [weiden] 17559: implemented CreateSymbolicLink() (not tested/verified yet!)

[Filip Navara]

[e-mail] wrote:
> +#define SYMLINK_FLAG_DIRECTORY 0x1

is there any reason not to name it SYMBOLIC_LINK_FLAG_DIRECTORY? (to be 
compatible)

- Filip

[Thomas Weidenmueller]

Filip Navara wrote:
> > +#define SYMLINK_FLAG_DIRECTORY 0x1
>
> is there any reason not to name it SYMBOLIC_LINK_FLAG_DIRECTORY? (to be
> compatible)

Sorry, i used the name documented at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/fs/c...

Feel free to change it ;)

Best Regards,
Thomas

[Alex Ionescu]

> Feel free to change it ;)

No, please don't feel free to do so, or I'll **** your ass :)
> Best Regards,
> Thomas

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

[K McI]

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> > Feel free to change it ;)
>
> No, please don't feel free to do so, or I'll **** your ass :)

Shouldn't that be "kick your ***" ?

-uQ

[TwoTailedFox]

Not if it's "**** your ass" ;)

On 8/27/05, K McI [e-mail] wrote:
> Alex Ionescu wrote:
> > > Feel free to change it ;)
> >
> > No, please don't feel free to do so, or I'll **** your ass :)
>
> Shouldn't that be "kick your ***" ?
>     -uQ
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- 
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"