Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 65678: [MSGINA]: Update the function names of stubs, with (in comments) the number of parameters they take. See CORE-8459 for more information. CORE-8459 #resolve #comment Fixed in r65678.

[Thomas Faber]

On 2014-12-15 22:07, hbelusca(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>   +1 stub -noname ShellGetUserList   ; (long long long)
For future reference, you might as well write this kind of thing as
1 stdcall -stub -noname ShellGetUserList(long long long)

Then spec2def will create a stub that uses the correct calling
convention and also prints out the arguments. Plus it's easier to
change to the real thing when someone implements it ;)

[Sylvain Petreolle]

Can this be used everywhere ?We have other stubs like this into user32 and userenv. Kind
regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
      De : Thomas Faber <thomas.faber(a)reactos.org>
 À : ros-dev(a)reactos.org 
 Envoyé le : Dimanche 25 janvier 2015 18h45
 Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 65678: [MSGINA]: Update the function names
of stubs, with (in comments) the number of parameters they take. See CORE-8459 for more
information. CORE-8459 #resolve #comment Fixed in r65678.
   
On 2014-12-15 22:07, hbelusca(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>   +1 stub -noname ShellGetUserList  ; (long long long)
For future reference, you might as well write this kind of thing as
1 stdcall -stub -noname ShellGetUserList(long long long)

Then spec2def will create a stub that uses the correct calling
convention and also prints out the arguments. Plus it's easier to
change to the real thing when someone implements it ;)

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev