On 2014-12-15 22:07, hbelusca@svn.reactos.org wrote:
+1 stub -noname ShellGetUserList ; (long long long)
For future reference, you might as well write this kind of thing as 1 stdcall -stub -noname ShellGetUserList(long long long)
Then spec2def will create a stub that uses the correct calling convention and also prints out the arguments. Plus it's easier to change to the real thing when someone implements it ;)
Can this be used everywhere ?We have other stubs like this into user32 and userenv. Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle De : Thomas Faber thomas.faber@reactos.org À : ros-dev@reactos.org Envoyé le : Dimanche 25 janvier 2015 18h45 Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 65678: [MSGINA]: Update the function names of stubs, with (in comments) the number of parameters they take. See CORE-8459 for more information. CORE-8459 #resolve #comment Fixed in r65678.
On 2014-12-15 22:07, hbelusca@svn.reactos.org wrote:
+1 stub -noname ShellGetUserList ; (long long long)
For future reference, you might as well write this kind of thing as 1 stdcall -stub -noname ShellGetUserList(long long long)
Then spec2def will create a stub that uses the correct calling convention and also prints out the arguments. Plus it's easier to change to the real thing when someone implements it ;)
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev