Release 0.2.6

[Jason Filby]

Hi all

The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need another 0.2.x release.
The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and there's still some
work to do to justify this.

Everyone agree?

Cheers
Jason

[Casper Hornstrup]

>   -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.com 
>  [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jason Filby
>  Sent: 23. februar 2005 18:57
>  To: ReactOS Development List
>  Subject: [ros-dev] Release 0.2.6
>  
>  Hi all
>  
>  The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need another 0.2.x release.
>  The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and there's 
>  still some work to do to justify this.
>  
>  Everyone agree? 
+1

[James Tabor]

Hi!
Jason Filby wrote:
>   Hi all
>  
>  The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need another 0.2.x release.
>  The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and there's still some
>  work to do to justify this.
>   
Network! Yes!

BTW this driver looks like it is working for me ATM.

http://ftp.sanguine.jp/pub/sahughes/drivers/via/VIA_Rhine_VT6102_PCI_Fast_E…

or

http://www.network-drivers.com/drivers/229/229275.htm

I use FETND5A.sys in place of pcnet.sys.
So far it does not crash or lockup.


>   Everyone agree?
>  
>  Cheers
>  Jason 
FYI,
James

[James Tabor]

Jason Filby wrote:
>   Hi all
>  
>  The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need another 0.2.x release.
>  The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and there's still some
>  work to do to justify this.
>  
>  Everyone agree?
>  
>  Cheers
>  Jason 
FYI,
Zip ATA drive support is broken again,
James

[Ge van Geldorp]

>   From: Jason Filby
>  
>  The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need another 0.2.x 
>  release. The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and 
>  there's still some work to do to justify this.
>  
>  Everyone agree? 
Yes.

Ge van Geldorp.

[Eric Kohl]

Jason Filby schrieb:

>   The consensus on IRC appears to be that we need
> another 0.2.x release.
>  The reason is that 0.3 is our "network" release and there's still some
>  work to do to justify this.
>  
>  Everyone agree? 
Sure!


Regards,
Eric