JIRA up again - Do we still need FishEye?

[Colin Finck]

Hi all!
Our two Atlassian tools JIRA and FishEye have been unavailable for some
hours again. I have brought JIRA back up, but FishEye has been eating
RAM and CPU like crazy again. In my opinion, this is unacceptable for a
tool that is just a simple commit browser to us. Also I don't have any
time to constantly monitor it this weekend, so I'm leaving it shut down
for now.
With us having https://github.com/reactos/reactos/commits/master and
https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=summary now, do we still need
FishEye at all?
If so, please tell me what features of it you would miss if it stays
down. Maybe there are other alternatives.
My last FishEye "performance" bug report took 3 months to resolve, and
I'm reluctant to go the same route again for another such bug..
Cheers,
Colin

[Mark Jansen]

Hey,
Well as far as I know, the only use we had for FishEye were code reviews
and smart commits,
and since we can now do CR's on github, the only use FishEye has is
integration with jira. (close issues, bind commits to jira issues).
If there is another way of getting functionality like that, I think we
should go for it.
Regards,
On 14-10-2017 17:38, Colin Finck wrote:
>   Hi all!
>  Our two Atlassian tools JIRA and FishEye have been unavailable for some
>  hours again. I have brought JIRA back up, but FishEye has been eating
>  RAM and CPU like crazy again. In my opinion, this is unacceptable for a
>  tool that is just a simple commit browser to us. Also I don't have any
>  time to constantly monitor it this weekend, so I'm leaving it shut down
>  for now.
>  With us having https://github.com/reactos/reactos/commits/master and
>  https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=summary now, do we still need
>  FishEye at all?
>  If so, please tell me what features of it you would miss if it stays
>  down. Maybe there are other alternatives.
>  My last FishEye "performance" bug report took 3 months to resolve, and
>  I'm reluctant to go the same route again for another such bug..
>  Cheers,
>  Colin
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Alexander Sh.]

See ticket https://jira.reactos.org/browse/ONLINE-731.
But for any integration except FishEye we must convert our other repos to
Git, because there are no real alternatives to FishEye for SVN.
2017-10-14 19:29 GMT+03:00 Mark Jansen <mark.jansen(a)reactos.org>rg>:
>   Hey,
>  Well as far as I know, the only use we had for FishEye were code reviews
>  and smart commits,
>  and since we can now do CR's on github, the only use FishEye has is
>  integration with jira. (close issues, bind commits to jira issues).
>  If there is another way of getting functionality like that, I think we
>  should go for it.
>  Regards,
>  On 14-10-2017 17:38, Colin Finck wrote:
> >   Hi all!
> >  Our two Atlassian tools JIRA and FishEye have been unavailable for some
> >  hours again. I have brought JIRA back up, but FishEye has been eating
> >  RAM and CPU like crazy again. In my opinion, this is unacceptable for a
> >  tool that is just a simple commit browser to us. Also I don't have any
> >  time to constantly monitor it this weekend, so I'm leaving it shut down
> >  for now.
> >  With us having https://github.com/reactos/reactos/commits/master and
> >  https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=summary now, do we still need
> >  FishEye at all?
> >  If so, please tell me what features of it you would miss if it stays
> >  down. Maybe there are other alternatives.
> >  My last FishEye "performance" bug report took 3 months to resolve, and
> >  I'm reluctant to go the same route again for another such bug..
> >  Cheers,
> >  Colin
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>