What happens in a situation where a project position is up for a vote, and only one candidate puts there name forward? Do we just state a unanimous decision, or to try and keep some kind of option do we do something like:
[] Yes, I want <person> to be <position> [] No, I don't want <person> to be <position>
There is nothing in the wiki for this situation.
************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
From: Murphy, Ged (Bolton)
What happens in a situation where a project position is up for a vote, and only one candidate puts there name forward? Do we just state a unanimous decision, or to try and keep some kind of option do we do something like:
[] Yes, I want <person> to be <position> [] No, I don't want <person> to be <position>
There is nothing in the wiki for this situation.
I think we should still vote. In the (unlikely) case that the candidate is rejected, we'd basically have the same situation as if noone stepped forward.
Gé van Geldorp.
-
Ge van Geldorp -
Murphy, Ged (Bolton)