Voting rule

[Murphy, Ged (Bolton)]

What happens in a situation where a project position is up for a vote, and
only one candidate puts there name forward?
Do we just state a unanimous decision, or to try and keep some kind of
option do we do something like:

[] Yes, I want <person> to be <position>
[] No, I don't want <person> to be <position>

There is nothing in the wiki for this situation.





************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk 
<mailto:[e-mail]> and then delete this message. 

Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com

[Ge van Geldorp]

>   From: Murphy, Ged (Bolton)
>  
>  What happens in a situation where a project position is up 
>  for a vote, and only one candidate puts there name forward?
>  Do we just state a unanimous decision, or to try and keep 
>  some kind of option do we do something like:
>  
>  [] Yes, I want <person> to be <position> [] No, I don't want 
>  <person> to be <position>
>  
>  There is nothing in the wiki for this situation. 
I think we should still vote. In the (unlikely) case that the candidate is
rejected, we'd basically have the same situation as if noone stepped
forward.

Gé van Geldorp.