RE: [ros-dev] RE: [ros-diffs] [mbosma] 20543: fix typos.

[Murphy, Ged (Bolton)]

Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote:
> > which, IIRC (I don't have a compiler to hand) would throw
>
> up 'assignment in
> > expression' errors with our MSVC /w4 setting. We would
>
> therefore need
> > something like :
>
> Then don't use that warning level if it rejects good code that's not
> even confusing.

It's set via rbuilds MSDN backend. It needs functionality to set different
warning levels for different components. e.g. /w4 for core components only. 
Having to do it manually is far too much effort for your average programmer
;)
Maybe I should stop moaning and correct it .... hmmm  :p
> > Which has suddenly become rather long for a normally simple
>
> message loop
> > routine ..... LOL
>
> It's exactly the same, just ugly IMO.

I know, as I said, it was just for fun.
First day back at work after the Christmas break is hard going ;)

(and why are these mails being sent to both ros-diff and ros-dev when only
addressed to ros-dev, Gé ?)

Ged.

************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
[e-mail] 
mailto:[e-mail] and then delete this message.

Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com

[Ge van Geldorp]

> From: Murphy, Ged (Bolton)
>
> (and why are these mails being sent to both ros-diff and 
> ros-dev when only addressed to ros-dev, Gé ?)

Not sure I understand what you mean. The original diff was sent to
ros-diffs. All followups were only sent to ros-dev, but the subject which
was copied from the original ros-diffs mail still includes "[ros-diffs]".

GvG

[Ged Murphy]

Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > From: Murphy, Ged (Bolton)
> >
> > (and why are these mails being sent to both ros-diff and 
> > ros-dev when only addressed to ros-dev, Gé ?)
>
> Not sure I understand what you mean. The original diff was sent to
> ros-diffs. All followups were only sent to ros-dev, but the subject which
> was copied from the original ros-diffs mail still includes "[ros-diffs]".
>
> GvG

Sorry, nevermind.
It doesn't happen on my home machine, it must be something in relation 
to my work account.

It's odd though. If I send a mail from my home (gmail using thunderbird) 
I never see the email come through the mail list.
If I send one from work, I get it twice. No big deal though.  :)

Ged.