Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 14754: Add KDBG debugging hack from old code and convert it to fit new one. Not enabled yet because it underflows the stack after a while (researching why).

[Anich Gregor]

This breaks parts of KDB too. Please finish your changes to ctxswitch.S and 
put back the old functionality (which KDB relies on) if possible.

[Alex Ionescu]

Anich Gregor wrote:
> This breaks parts of KDB too. Please finish your changes to ctxswitch.S and 
> put back the old functionality (which KDB relies on) if possible.

Hi,

Once again, I was able to use KDBG properly and did not find any 
problems. I am also unable to add back the old AT&T code because I still 
don't fully understand how it works and how to make it fit in.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

[Anich Gregor]

On Monday 13 June 2005 21:54, Alex Ionescu wrote:
> Anich Gregor wrote:
> > This breaks parts of KDB too. Please finish your changes to ctxswitch.S
> > and put back the old functionality (which KDB relies on) if possible.
>
> Hi,
>
> Once again, I was able to use KDBG properly and did not find any
> problems. I am also unable to add back the old AT&T code because I still
> don't fully understand how it works and how to make it fit in.

You dont have to understand the code, just convert it from at&t to intel like 
you did with the other code, and don't remove parts of the code because you 
think it's not needed, unless you understand the code.

If you were able to use KDBG properly you havent tested it properly.

I have fixed this too, and sent hpoussin a patch.

Please be careful when touching KDB, and if in doubt, don't touch it or let 
others test your changes (my KDB rewrite was tested a few weeks by 1 or 2 
people...)