Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [spetreolle] 65378: [ADVAPI_WINETEST] Make peace^W tests, not war.☮ Wave a hello to sysreg so that it doesn't kill us. ROSTESTS-56

[Thomas Faber]

Hmm, my thought behind disabling this was more that this one test
doesn't justify increasing our whole test run time by 10%.

On 2014-11-11 11:12, [e-mail] wrote:
> Author: spetreolle
> Date: Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014
> New Revision: 65378
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=65378&view=rev
> Log:
> [ADVAPI_WINETEST]
> Make peace^W tests, not war.☮
> Wave a hello to sysreg so that it doesn't kill us.
> ROSTESTS-56
>
> Modified:
>      trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c
>
> Modified: trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service...
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c	[iso-8859-1] (original)
> +++ trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c	[iso-8859-1] Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014
> @@ -2166,6 +2166,9 @@
>       DWORD le1, le2;
>       SERVICE_STATUS status;
>
> +#ifdef __REACTOS__
> fprintf(stdout, "ROSTESTS-56: Hello sysreg, I am awake\n");
>
> +#endif
>       ret = StartServiceA(svc_handle, 0, NULL);
>       le1 = GetLastError();
>       ok(!ret, "%s: StartServiceA() should have failed\n", name);
> @@ -2260,12 +2263,6 @@
>            * insanely long timeout: 120s. So skip the rest of the tests.
>            */
>           win_skip("Skip some service start/stop tests on NT4\n");
>    goto cleanup;
> }
> if (!winetest_interactive)
> {
>    skip("ROSTESTS-56: Skipping service start timeout tests!\n");
>     goto cleanup;
> }