State of 0.3.3

[Colin Finck]

Hello,

As you probably saw, I recently rebranched 0.3.3 and made some changes to
it.
Now I'm at the point, where *I* think that it's ready.

I don't know if anyone else has any specific plans for 0.3.3, so I'm just
asking here now.
Otherwise, I think we could simply release the current branch as RC2 or even
REL. But also if we release it as RC2 now, what are the plans for the REL
version then?

Please also think of our planned 2-month release cycle.
I know that these are just estimated dates, where users *can* expect a
release and I myself said this a couple of times as well, but we already
skipped 0.3.2, so we shouldn't miss the "deadline" for 0.3.3 now.

Regards,

Colin

[Ged]

Is this not meant for discussion between yourself and the relavent 
developers?
That's why you're meant to be the release coordinator.
We don't want to make it look like we aren't confident about what we're 
doing ;)

Colin Finck wrote:
>   Hello,
>
>  As you probably saw, I recently rebranched 0.3.3 and made some changes to
>  it.
>  Now I'm at the point, where *I* think that it's ready.
>
>  I don't know if anyone else has any specific plans for 0.3.3, so I'm just
>  asking here now.
>  Otherwise, I think we could simply release the current branch as RC2 or even
>  REL. But also if we release it as RC2 now, what are the plans for the REL
>  version then?
>
>  Please also think of our planned 2-month release cycle.
>  I know that these are just estimated dates, where users *can* expect a
>  release and I myself said this a couple of times as well, but we already
>  skipped 0.3.2, so we shouldn't miss the "deadline" for 0.3.3 now.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Colin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>

[Zachary Gorden]

Releasing it depends on whether that Firefox browsing bug is fixed, and that
in my book is a blocker, and whether Magnus' thing is ready and whether we
really intend on including it.

Z

On 8/25/07, Ged <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>  Is this not meant for discussion between yourself and the relavent
>  developers?
>  That's why you're meant to be the release coordinator.
>  We don't want to make it look like we aren't confident about what we're
>  doing ;)
>
>  Colin Finck wrote:
> >   Hello,
> >
> >  As you probably saw, I recently rebranched 0.3.3 and made some changes 
>  to
> >   it.
> >  Now I'm at the point, where *I* think that it's ready.
> >
> >  I don't know if anyone else has any specific plans for 0.3.3, so I'm 
>  just
> >   asking here now.
> >  Otherwise, I think we could simply release the current branch as RC2 or 
>  even
> >   REL. But also if we release it as RC2 now, what
> > are the plans for the 
>  REL
> >   version then?
> >
> >  Please also think of our planned 2-month release cycle.
> >  I know that these are just estimated dates, where users *can* expect a
> >  release and I myself said this a couple of times as well, but we already
> >  skipped 0.3.2, so we shouldn't miss the "deadline" for 0.3.3 now.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >
> >  Colin
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Magnus Olsen]

if fireball or waxdragon have listen to me what I think on each release. it should never
have been a release
I never happy with a release, I whant that and that beign fix.  I whant everthing working
that is
my problem, I whant everting works well like it does in windows


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Zachary Gorden 
  To: ReactOS Development List 
  Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 2:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] State of 0.3.3


  Releasing it depends on whether that Firefox browsing bug is fixed, and that in my book
is a blocker, and whether Magnus' thing is ready and whether we really intend on
including it.

  Z


  On 8/25/07, Ged <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
    Is this not meant for discussion between yourself and the relavent
    developers?
    That's why you're meant to be the release coordinator.
    We don't want to make it look like we aren't confident about what we're 
    doing ;)

    Colin Finck wrote:
>   Hello,
>
>  As you probably saw, I recently rebranched 0.3.3 and made some changes to
>  it.
>  Now I'm at the point, where *I* think that it's ready. 
>
>  I don't know if anyone else has any specific plans for 0.3.3, so I'm just
>  asking here now.
>  Otherwise, I think we could simply release the current branch as RC2 or even
>  REL. But also if we release it as RC2 now, what are the plans for the REL 
>  version then?
>
>  Please also think of our planned 2-month release cycle.
>  I know that these are just estimated dates, where users *can* expect a
>  release and I myself said this a couple of times as well, but we already 
>  skipped 0.3.2, so we shouldn't miss the "deadline" for 0.3.3 now.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Colin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list 
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>  
    _______________________________________________ 
    Ros-dev mailing list
    Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
    http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Ros-dev mailing list
  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Samuel serapion]

Fire at will!

-- 
encoded
Samuel Serapión Vega