Does anyone mind if I import libjpeg for jpg support ? The License is not a problem, but the patent might be. Sorry that ask so late (did already a vendor import). I asked 2 times on IRC and thought that would be enough, but GreatLord convinced me that I have to asked here too.
Maarten Bosma
PS: The size of the files that would go into reactos/lib is 694 KB.
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
Casper
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Bosma Sent: 30. december 2005 02:27 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: [ros-dev] libjpeg
Does anyone mind if I import libjpeg for jpg support ? The License is not a problem, but the patent might be. Sorry that ask so late (did already a vendor import). I asked 2 times on IRC and thought that would be enough, but GreatLord convinced me that I have to asked here too.
Maarten Bosma
PS: The size of the files that would go into reactos/lib is 694 KB. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
Casper
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Potential_patent_issues
Well, it says the patent will expire in 2006.
Casper
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Bosma Sent: 30. december 2005 12:46 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] libjpeg
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
Casper
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Potential_patent_issues _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
HI I read a company have manger get new patent of jpg and demaning roytes for every using jpg in usa. Sony and Mircrosoft have been force paying for it using jpg decompress in there productis in USA.
I am ageint using jpg or libjpg in the core for it can be a patent issue problem.
And it should be put into a vote. and not importet at all to reactos.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Casper Hornstrup" ch@csh-consult.dk To: "'ReactOS Development List'" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: den 30 December 2005 12:59 Subject: RE: [ros-dev] libjpeg
Well, it says the patent will expire in 2006.
Casper
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org]
On Behalf Of Maarten Bosma
Sent: 30. december 2005 12:46 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] libjpeg
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant
smaller implementation.
Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the
parts that is
covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
Casper
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Potential_patent_issues _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
As far as I know, GIF's patent has already expired, it wouldn't surprise me if JPEG's will do so, too.
On 12/30/05, Casper Hornstrup ch@csh-consult.dk wrote:
Well, it says the patent will expire in 2006.
Casper
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Bosma Sent: 30. december 2005 12:46 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] libjpeg
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
Casper
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Potential_patent_issues _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke"
On Friday 30 December 2005 03:44, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we do with freetype?
As far as I know the IJPG implementation (that is, the International JPEG group) - which is used by MS as well as all GNU systems - is totally free and clear. It is covered by something similar to the GPL and, IIRC, all you need to do is include a copy of the license and state that you are using the license. MS does this and, of course, Linux and BSD and all other OS operating systems include all the docs from the source distro as well as, in most cases, including the complete source.
D.R.H.
links about the issue http://slashdot.org/yro/02/07/18/157217.shtml?tid=155
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,63200,00.html?tw=wn_story_related
The patent will run out in oct 2006 after that I do not see any problem with usinh libjpg or have it in reactos Before that it is not accpect
----- Original Message ----- From: "D. Hazelton" dhazelton@enter.net To: "ReactOS Development List" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: den 30 December 2005 13:05 Subject: Re: [ros-dev] libjpeg
On Friday 30 December 2005 03:44, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
No problem here. JPEG is complex and I doubt we can find a significant smaller implementation. Which parts are patented and in which countries? Can you disable the parts that is covered by patents by default like we
do
with freetype?
As far as I know the IJPG implementation (that is, the International JPEG group) - which is used by MS as well as all GNU systems - is totally free
and
clear. It is covered by something similar to the GPL and, IIRC, all you
need
to do is include a copy of the license and state that you are using the license. MS does this and, of course, Linux and BSD and all other OS operating systems include all the docs from the source distro as well as,
in
most cases, including the complete source.
D.R.H. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
I think it is fine to bring it in. A lot of companies think that the patent is not right. And even if it is valid, it is ending soon and in the code you can avoid using it by another method. So... i don't think there is not a reason to use it.
Brandon
Maarten Bosma wrote:
Does anyone mind if I import libjpeg for jpg support ? The License is not a problem, but the patent might be. Sorry that ask so late (did already a vendor import). I asked 2 times on IRC and thought that would be enough, but GreatLord convinced me that I have to asked here too.
Maarten Bosma
PS: The size of the files that would go into reactos/lib is 694 KB. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev