On 2016-03-03 01:36, hbelusca@svn.reactos.org wrote:
@@ -160,9 +163,9 @@
switch (argv[i][1]) {
case L'?':Usage(argv[0]);break;
// case L'?':// Usage(argv[0]);// return i; case L'F': case L'f': {
What is the purpose of this?
Thanks, Thomas
I wanted to add a proper '?' switch, but I've seen that if I do that, chkdsk in its current implementation runs afterwards a check (I noticed that after the commit that added the '?'). So I temporarily disabled it in this commit for further investigation (aka. modifying the ProcessCommandLine procedure so that it doesn't run the checkdisk if you use '?', *and* such that it doesn't say that '?' is an unrecognized cmdline option).
Hermès.
-----Message d'origine----- De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Thomas Faber Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2016 11:27 À : ros-dev@reactos.org Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 70869: [AUTOCHK][CHKDSK]: Minor fixes / formatting. Really add chkdsk to build. [FMIFS]: Quickly implement the chkdsk function, the same way as it is done for the formatting function.
On 2016-03-03 01:36, hbelusca@svn.reactos.org wrote:
@@ -160,9 +163,9 @@
switch (argv[i][1]) {
case L'?':Usage(argv[0]);break;
// case L'?':// Usage(argv[0]);// return i; case L'F': case L'f': {
What is the purpose of this?
Thanks, Thomas
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev