0.3.1

[Maarten Bosma]

Can we agree on the following goals for 0.3.1 ?

- NDK
- Cache Manager Rewrite
- VMware Tools
- Ext2

It would mean that we would release 0.3.1 very closely after 0.3.0.


Maarten Bosma

[David Hinz]

If these are the goals for 0.3.1, I think many people wouldn't recognise 
these really awesome changes and would just see, that there aren't many 
changes in 0.3.0.

So maybe it would be more intelligent to either put these changes in our 
current 0.3.0 branch, or to rename the 0.3.0 branch to 0.2.10.

These new features could bring is alot publicity, together with the 
version number 0.3.0., where people would actually see them.

But if we change the plan and introduce these changes in 0.3.0, I think 
we should work together with some magazines and prepare some press material.

This _could_ become a huge pr show!

Just my thoughts on this...

Greets,

David Hinz

Maarten Bosma schrieb:
>   Can we agree on the following goals for 0.3.1 ?
>  
>  - NDK
>  - Cache Manager Rewrite
>  - VMware Tools
>  - Ext2
>  
>  It would mean that we would release 0.3.1 very closely after 0.3.0.
>  
>  
>  Maarten Bosma
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Magnus Olsen]

Destions have been made cc and NDK  will be in 0.3.1
we are almost done with 0.3.0 road map. and we need
stable the tree before next release.

People will see diffent in 0.3.0 againts 0.2.9
it is alot of new stuff, and visual stuff






----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Hinz" <post.center(a)gmail.com>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.1


>   If these are the goals for 0.3.1, I think many people
> wouldn't recognise
>  these really awesome changes and would just see, that there aren't many
>  changes in 0.3.0.
>
>  So maybe it would be more intelligent to either put these changes in our
>  current 0.3.0 branch, or to rename the 0.3.0 branch to 0.2.10.
>
>  These new features could bring is alot publicity, together with the
>  version number 0.3.0., where people would actually see them.
>
>  But if we change the plan and introduce these changes in 0.3.0, I think
>  we should work together with some magazines and prepare some press 
material.
>  
>  This _could_ become a huge pr show!
>
>  Just my thoughts on this...
>
>  Greets,
>
>  David Hinz
>
>  Maarten Bosma schrieb:
> >   Can we agree on the following goals for 0.3.1 ?
> >
> >  - NDK
> >  - Cache Manager Rewrite
> >  - VMware Tools
> >  - Ext2
> >
> >  It would mean that we would release 0.3.1 very closely after 0.3.0.
> >
> >
> >  Maarten Bosma
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Maarten Bosma]

David Hinz wrote:
>   So maybe it would be more intelligent to either put
> these changes in our 
>  current 0.3.0 branch,  
Hear Wax's comment on this:
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NO
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NO
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NOI
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NOPE
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NADA
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NUNCA
[10 May 06 17:37] WaxDragon: NEIN

>   or to rename the 0.3.0 branch to 0.2.10. 
Have
you read what the channel topic in our IRC channel already since 
some time is ?

[WaxDragon]

On 5/10/06, David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   If these are the goals for 0.3.1, I think many people
> wouldn't recognise
>  these really awesome changes and would just see, that there aren't many
>  changes in 0.3.0.
>
>  So maybe it would be more intelligent to either put these changes in our
>  current 0.3.0 branch, or to rename the 0.3.0 branch to 0.2.10.
>
>  These new features could bring is alot publicity, together with the
>  version number 0.3.0., where people would actually see them.
>
>  But if we change the plan and introduce these changes in 0.3.0, I think
>  we should work together with some magazines and prepare some press material.
>
>  This _could_ become a huge pr show!
>
>  Just my thoughts on this...
>
>  Greets,
>
>  David Hinz
>  
This is strictly a roadmap issue.  The goals for 0.3.0 have been met,
FINALLY.  The NDK and CC changes need time to be tested, and that's
not going to take just a few hours.

WD
--
ReactOS is a hub, follow the spokes and you'll
immediately find absolutely everything you need
to know about Windows.  ReactOS is not just
software, it's people.
                                        kjk_hyperion

[Steven Edwards]

Hi,

On 5/10/06, WaxDragon <waxdragon(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   This is strictly a roadmap issue.  The goals for 0.3.0
> have been met,
>  FINALLY.  The NDK and CC changes need time to be tested, and that's
>  not going to take just a few hours. 
I agree. Even if not all of the roadmap issues for 0.3 are really
reached or stable it has been way to long in the 0.2.x cycle. We have
added enough new features that 0.3 is now warrented even if its not
very stable. The influx of new developers should help with the
auditing of ntoskrnl and fixing of win32k for 0.4

-- 
Steven Edwards

"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

[Maarten Bosma]

So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage with this items.


Maarten Bosma

>   Can we agree on the following goals for 0.3.1 ?
>  
>  - NDK
>  - Cache Manager Rewrite
>  - VMware Tools
>  - Ext2
>  
>  It would mean that we would release 0.3.1 very closely after 0.3.0.

[Ged Murphy]

Maarten Bosma wrote:
>   So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage with
> this items. 
I'm a little concerned about the ext2 feature.
I hope to see 0.3.1 come quite quickly after 0.3.0, and wouldn't want 
something we don't really need like ext2 holding things up.

Ged.

[James Tabor]

Ged Murphy wrote:
>   Maarten Bosma wrote:
>  
> >   So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage
> > with this items. 
>  
>  
>  I'm a little concerned about the ext2 feature. 
Relax, I'll play with it and merge it back and build a patch. It had one
bug which a large file ~5 meg would crash it.

>   I hope to see 0.3.1 come quite quickly after 0.3.0,
> and wouldn't want 
>  something we don't really need like ext2 holding things up.
>  
>  Ged.
>  
>  
>   
Thanks,
James

[Maarten Bosma]

James Tabor schrieb:
>   Ged Murphy wrote:
>  
> >   Maarten Bosma wrote:
> >
> > >   So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage
> > > with this items. 
> >
> >
> >  I'm a little concerned about the ext2 feature. 
>  
>  
>  Relax, I'll play with it and merge it back and build a patch. It had one
>  bug which a large file ~5 meg would crash it.
>   
Yes and this is what the cc branch should fix.

Maarten Bosma

[James Tabor]

Maarten Bosma wrote:
>   James Tabor schrieb:
>  
> >   Ged Murphy wrote:
> >
> > >   Maarten Bosma wrote:
> > >
> > > >   So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage
> > > > with this items. 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  I'm a little concerned about the ext2 feature. 
> >
> >
> >  Relax, I'll play with it and merge it back and build a patch. It had one
> >  bug which a large file ~5 meg would crash it.
> >  
>  Yes and this is what the cc branch should fix.
>  
>  Maarten Bosma 
Hum? okay!

Its in the ext2 branch.
http://svn.reactos.ru/svn/reactos/branches/ext2/reactos/

I have posted on the ML,
http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-February/001737.html

http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-June/003686.html
{
James Tabor wrote:

>   Only 4194304 bytes copied to drive C:. Does that
> number look anything
>  familiar
>  to anyone? How about 400000 Hex. 
Of course it does ... it's about the time when indirect blocks start to
be used instead of direct blocks...

- Filip
}

The ext2 branch works with small files and I've tested it since last year.
After writing to the ext2 partition, I have to boot linux and e2fsck it.

Thanks,
James

[Magnus Olsen]

Let us first get out 0.3.0
then we need make a new roadmap for 0.3.1

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maarten Bosma" <maarten.paul(a)bosma.de>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.1


>   So, if no one objects I will create the wikipage with
> this items.
>  
>  
>  Maarten Bosma
>  
> >   Can we agree on the following goals for 0.3.1 ?
> >  
> >  - NDK
> >  - Cache Manager Rewrite
> >  - VMware Tools
> >  - Ext2
> >  
> >  It would mean that we would release 0.3.1 very closely after 0.3.0. 
> _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Brandon Turner]

Magnus Olsen wrote:

>  Let us first get out 0.3.0
> then we need make a new roadmap for 0.3.1
>   
>  
+1

Brandon

[Maarten Bosma]

Magnus Olsen wrote:
>   Let us first get out 0.3.0
>  then we need make a new roadmap for 0.3.1 
Erm. Could you give any resons for this
?

Ged Murphy wrote:
>   I'm a little concerned about the ext2 feature.
>  I hope to see 0.3.1 come quite quickly after 0.3.0, and wouldn't want something we
> don't really need like ext2 holding things up.  
Well this was based on the
information that the ext2 branch is just 
waiting for the cc rewrite to be merged.

I wrote:
>   - Cache Manager Rewrite  
I was just informed
that we can not commit the branch to trunk, before 
the changed are audited. I untruly thought that we could make a 
exception for a branch beeing merged. Since lot's of changes inside of 
the memory manager are involved, the hole plan can be forgotten.


Maarten Bosma