Re: [ros-dev] 4th scenario

[Love Nystrom]

Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations anymore,
but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies
and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions).
Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise,
as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system
(scheduler, et c).  Paging the kernel would be a big mistake.
Best Regards
// Neo
On 2016-05-22 18.42, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org wrote:
>   They are not fucked up, since they legitimately
> don't care for the 3
>  people out there still using 2k3.
>  And we are not fucked up, we are only pushed to move to NT6+
>  Timo
>  Am 21.05.2016 um 06:12 schrieb Love Nystrom:
> > No, they are... Not we ;)
> > Same thing would happen if you try to run e.g. a Vista exe on NT4.
> >
> > // Neo
> >
> > On 2016-05-20 22.52, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo
> > <elhoir(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support
> > > Date: 2016-05-20 22.51
> > >
> > > 4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any
> > export. We´re fucked up :P 
--
There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]

[David Quintana (gigaherz)]

No one is suggesting paging the kernel. Stop being paranoid about that. We
are speaking about API interfaces for user apps and drivers. Whatever that
implies, will be examined on a case by case basis.  ;P
On 22 May 2016 at 23:14, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations
> anymore,
>  but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies
>  and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions).
>  Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise,
>  as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system
>  (scheduler, et c).  Paging the kernel would be a big mistake.
>  Best Regards
>  // Neo
>  On 2016-05-22 18.42, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org wrote:
>  They are not fucked up, since they legitimately don't care for the 3
>  people out there still using 2k3.
>  And we are not fucked up, we are only pushed to move to NT6+
>  Timo
>  Am 21.05.2016 um 06:12 schrieb Love Nystrom:
>  No, they are... Not we ;)
>  Same thing would happen if you try to run e.g. a Vista exe on NT4.
>  // Neo
>  On 2016-05-20 22.52, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir(a)gmail.com>
>  <elhoir(a)gmail.com> <elhoir(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >   Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS
> > support
> >  Date: 2016-05-20 22.51
> >  4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export. 
> We´re fucked up :P
>  --
>  There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
>  and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Riccardo Paolo Bestetti]

Il 22/05/2016 23:14, Love Nystrom ha scritto:
>   Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations
> anymore, but I think
>  it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies and home
>  servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions). 
It /is/ pretty
uncommon.
I'm in contact with IT administrators from many small companies, at this
point everyone has either (a) moved to Linux, (b) moved to some kind of
cloud service or (c) upgraded to Server 2012.
Even my school, which struggles to repaint walls, has done (c), lol.
I don't know if it is any different in other parts of the world, but I
suspect it is pretty much the same.
Best regards,
--- /Riccardo Paolo Bestetti/

[David Quintana (gigaherz)]

"Small companies and home servers" would often just be retail desktop
machines using home/pro editions (XP) instead of server editions.
On 23 May 2016 at 10:31, Riccardo Paolo Bestetti <riccardo.kyogre(a)live.it>
wrote:
>   Il 22/05/2016 23:14, Love Nystrom ha scritto:
>  Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations anymore, but I think
>  it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies and home servers
>  (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions).
>  It *is* pretty uncommon.
>  I'm in contact with IT administrators from many small companies, at this
>  point everyone has either (a) moved to Linux, (b) moved to some kind of
>  cloud service or (c) upgraded to Server 2012.
>  Even my school, which struggles to repaint walls, has done (c), lol.
>  I don't know if it is any different in other parts of the world, but I
>  suspect it is pretty much the same.
>  Best regards,
>  --- *Riccardo Paolo Bestetti*
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>