sir_richard@svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: sir_richard Date: Mon Sep 20 06:30:21 2010 New Revision: 48825
<!-- FIXME: workarounds until we have a proper oldnames library -->
- <define name="lseek">_lseek</define>
- <define name="read">_read</define>
- <define name="strdup">_strdup</define>
What's not "proper" with our oldnames library?
Unknown, this FIXME was copy/pasted from other .rbuild files which already contained similar hacks.
Note: adding oldnames library does not fix the issue.
-r
sir_richard@svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: sir_richard Date: Mon Sep 20 06:30:21 2010 New Revision: 48825
<!-- FIXME: workarounds until we have a proper oldnames library -->
- <define name="lseek">_lseek</define>
- <define name="read">_read</define>
- <define name="strdup">_strdup</define>
What's not "proper" with our oldnames library?
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
On 20/09/2010 13.11, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
What's not "proper" with our oldnames library?
it should be a library of aliases. it isn't. objdump the original oldnames.lib from Microsoft, compare with ours: completely different
hey kjk, nice to see you here :)
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:52 PM, KJK::Hyperion hackbunny@reactos.orgwrote:
On 20/09/2010 13.11, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
What's not "proper" with our oldnames library?
it should be a library of aliases. it isn't. objdump the original oldnames.lib from Microsoft, compare with ours: completely different
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev