Debug log problems

[Aleksey Bragin]

Hello,
it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The example 
below is made using latest VirtualBox 3.

Suggestions and questions:

1. usbohci - it's left on intentionally to better aid debugging?
Allright, however I think these lines
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/usb/usbohci/hardware.cpp:1199) 
Waiting 0 milliseconds for port power up 
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/usb/usbohci/hardware.cpp:1145) 
Enabling status change
repeated 8 times is a little bit too much.

Same about libusb listing statuses of all ports. Which goes on yet 
another time with EHCI controller.

2. What are these lines? Repeated 14 times
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:2959) 
ZwOpenFile failed with status 0xc000003a

3. What happened to the floppy driver?
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1579) 
'\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:61) 
Deleting driver object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:87) 
HACK: Not unloading the driver image due to critical bugs!
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1961) 
IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:935) 
Leaking driver: floppy.sys

Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed?

4. These lines repeated 20 times.
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c:811) 
NtCreateSection() failed (Status 0xc0000022).
Why creating section in LdrpVerifyImageMatchesChecksum() failes now?

5. Win32 stage.
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/winsta.c:208) 
err: Invalid window station handle
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/ntuser.c:161) 
err: Enter NtUserInitialize(0, 00000000, 00000000)
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/display.c:79) 
err: InitDisplayDriver
(\Device\Video0, \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware 
Profiles\Current\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBE\Device0);

What happens here? It's a normal bootup, everyone should see this. Why 
is invalid window station handle being passed, why do we need 
NtUserInitialize to produce ERR debug print, along with 
InitDisplayDriver. Are those errors? If not, then why the hell are they 
being printed? If yes, then I don't see any info about actual errors.

6. 
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/window.c:2416) 
err: DestroyWindow AOW
AOW? ORLY?

7. MASSIVE portcls spam. I won't even count lines.
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/wdm/audio/backpln/portcls/undoc.cpp:281) 
Calling Node 16 MajorTarget B01EF750 MinorTarget 00000000 PropertySet 
{45ffaaa0-6e1b-11d0-bcf2-444553540000} PropertyId 4 PropertyFlags 
10000200 InstanceSize 0 ValueSize 40 Handler FB24E58A PropertyRequest 
FF55B5F8 PropertyItemFlags 203 PropertyItemId 4
A few pages of that stuff. Is it really useful for everyone, including 
automated testing systems?

8. A work queue deadlock. Not a good thing at all
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c:351) EX: Work 
Queue Deadlock detected: 1 
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c:353) Dynamic 
threads queued 2

9. ???

All that resulted from my desire to just compare logs attached to the 
bug report. New log is totally unreadable, I had to spend time figuring 
out where actually that Live Essentials app was started, what problems 
it shows, etc.


Best regards,
Aleksey.

[Andrew Faulds]

*disables debug logging*

"Hey aleksey, I fixed it!"
On Jun 6, 2012 1:46 PM, "Aleksey Bragin" <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:

>   Hello,
>  it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The example
>  below is made using latest VirtualBox 3.
>
>  Suggestions and questions:
>
>  1. usbohci - it's left on intentionally to better aid debugging?
>  Allright, however I think these lines
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/drivers/usb/**usbohci/hardware.cpp:1199)
>  Waiting 0 milliseconds for port power up (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**
>  cmake/build/drivers/usb/**usbohci/hardware.cpp:1145) Enabling status
>  change
>  repeated 8 times is a little bit too much.
>
>  Same about libusb listing statuses of all ports. Which goes on yet another
>  time with EHCI controller.
>
>  2. What are these lines? Repeated 14 times
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/**sysldr.c:2959)
>  ZwOpenFile failed with status 0xc000003a
>
>  3. What happened to the floppy driver?
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/**driver.c:1579)
>  '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/**driver.c:61)
>  Deleting driver object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/**driver.c:87)
>  HACK: Not unloading the driver image due to critical bugs!
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/**driver.c:1961)
>  IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/**sysldr.c:935)
>  Leaking driver: floppy.sys
>
>  Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed?
>
>  4. These lines repeated 20 times.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/dll/ntdll/ldr/**ldrapi.c:811)
>  NtCreateSection() failed (Status 0xc0000022).
>  Why creating section in LdrpVerifyImageMatchesChecksum**() failes now?
>
>  5. Win32 stage.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/win32ss/user/**ntuser/winsta.c:208)
>  err: Invalid window station handle
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/win32ss/user/**ntuser/ntuser.c:161)
>  err: Enter NtUserInitialize(0, 00000000, 00000000)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/win32ss/user/**ntuser/display.c:79)
>  err: InitDisplayDriver
>  (\Device\Video0, \Registry\Machine\System\**CurrentControlSet\Hardware
>  Profiles\Current\System\**CurrentControlSet\Services\**VBE\Device0);
>
>  What happens here? It's a normal bootup, everyone should see this. Why is
>  invalid window station handle being passed, why do we need NtUserInitialize
>  to produce ERR debug print, along with InitDisplayDriver. Are those errors?
>  If not, then why the hell are they being printed? If yes, then I don't see
>  any info about actual errors.
>
>  6. (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/win32ss/user/**ntuser/window.c:2416)
>  err: DestroyWindow AOW
>  AOW? ORLY?
>
>  7. MASSIVE portcls spam. I won't even count lines.
>
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/drivers/wdm/audio/**backpln/portcls/undoc.cpp:281)
>  Calling Node 16 MajorTarget B01EF750 MinorTarget 00000000 PropertySet
>  {45ffaaa0-6e1b-11d0-bcf2-**444553540000} PropertyId 4 PropertyFlags
>  10000200 InstanceSize 0 ValueSize 40 Handler FB24E58A PropertyRequest
>  FF55B5F8 PropertyItemFlags 203 PropertyItemId 4
>  A few pages of that stuff. Is it really useful for everyone, including
>  automated testing systems?
>
>  8. A work queue deadlock. Not a good thing at all
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.**c:351) EX:
>  Work Queue Deadlock detected: 1 (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_**
>  cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.**c:353) Dynamic threads queued 2
>
>  9. ???
>
>  All that resulted from my desire to just compare logs attached to the bug
>  report. New log is totally unreadable, I had to spend time figuring out
>  where actually that Live Essentials app was started, what problems it
>  shows, etc.
>
>
>  Best regards,
>  Aleksey.
>
>
>  ______________________________**_________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
> http://www.reactos.org/**mailman/listinfo/ros-dev<http://www.reactos.org…
>

[Sylvain Petreolle]

Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle


>  ________________________________
>  De : Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> 
> Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45
> Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems
>  
> Hello,
> it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The example below is made
> using latest VirtualBox 3.
>
> 3. What happened to the floppy driver?
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1579)
> '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:61) Deleting driver
> object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:87) HACK: Not unloading
> the driver image due to critical bugs!
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1961)
> IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:935) Leaking driver:
> floppy.sys
>
> Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All that resulted from my desire to just compare logs attached to the bug report. New log
> is totally unreadable, I had to spend time figuring out where actually that Live
> Essentials app was started, what problems it shows, etc.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Aleksey.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>

Works fine on VBox 4.1.16?

We kinda dont support Vbox 3 as its... old and having problems
with com output?



On Wed, Jun 6, 2012, at 03:57 PM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:



Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
  ____________________________________________________________

De : Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45
Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems

Hello,
it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The
example below is made using latest VirtualBox 3.

3. What happened to the floppy driver?
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:
1579) '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:
61) Deleting driver object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:
87) HACK: Not unloading the driver image due to critical bugs!
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:
1961) IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
(/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:9
35) Leaking driver: floppy.sys

Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not
fixed?


All that resulted from my desire to just compare logs attached to
the bug report. New log is totally unreadable, I had to spend
time figuring out where actually that Live Essentials app was
started, what problems it shows, etc.
Best regards,
Aleksey.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[1]Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
[2]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

[3]Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

[4]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



--

With best regards

Caemyr

References

1. mailto:[e-mail]
2. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
3. mailto:[e-mail]
4. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

VBox 4.0.x was indeed broken, but 4.1.x is a lot better. It also
is able to use extended CPU virtualisation functions, present
from Nehalem upwards, thus its running on windows testbot.





On Thu, Jun 7, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Александр wrote:





07.06.2012, 01:53, "caemyr(a)myopera.com" <caemyr(a)myopera.com>om>:

Works fine on VBox 4.1.16?

We kinda dont support Vbox 3 as its... old and having problems
with com output?





 W00T?!

  I used to be told by a lot of devs that Vbox 4 is buggy suxx,
and VirtualBox 3.2.14 is a better one. So where is the truth?







On Wed, Jun 6, 2012, at 03:57 PM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:



Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
  ____________________________________________________________

De : Aleksey Bragin <[1]aleksey(a)reactos.org>
À : ReactOS Development List <[2]ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45
Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems



--

With best regards

Caemyr

  _______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

[3]Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

[4]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

--

С наилучшими пожеланиями, Александр.

_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

[5]Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

[6]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



--

With best regards

Caemyr

References

1. mailto:[e-mail]
2. mailto:[e-mail]
3. mailto:[e-mail]
4. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
5. mailto:[e-mail]
6. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Sylvain Petreolle]

You don't have a floppy drive attached to your VM, do you ?
Except the HACK thing this is the normal output when a device isn't there.

Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle


>  ________________________________
>  De : Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> 
> Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45
> Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems
>  
> 3. What happened to the floppy driver?
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1579)
> '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:61) Deleting driver
> object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:87) HACK: Not unloading
> the driver image due to critical bugs!
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1961)
> IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:935) Leaking driver:
> floppy.sys
>
> Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed? 
Best
regards,
>  Aleksey.
>

[Cameron Gutman]

Maybe I can shed some light on the situation.

On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:45 AM, Aleksey Bragin wrote:

>   Hello,
>  it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The example below is
> made using latest VirtualBox 3.
>  
>  Suggestions and questions:
>  
>  1. usbohci - it's left on intentionally to better aid debugging?
>  Allright, however I think these lines
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/usb/usbohci/hardware.cpp:1199) Waiting 0
> milliseconds for port power up
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/usb/usbohci/hardware.cpp:1145) Enabling
> status change
>  repeated 8 times is a little bit too much.
>  
>  Same about libusb listing statuses of all ports. Which goes on yet another time with EHCI
> controller. 
We can turn these off but we'll be losing potentially valuable
debugging information on systems with USB that we don't initialize correctly.
>   
>  2. What are these lines? Repeated 14 times
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:2959) ZwOpenFile failed
> with status 0xc000003a 
These are generated because in stage 0, the kernel tries to
load drivers for child devices of the bus devices listed in the CriticalDeviceDatabase
which is correct behavior.
If the service is not marked boot start (and thus loaded by the boot loader), it will
generate this error since the I/O subsystem isn't up until stage 1 where enumerating
is repeated, properly loading the drivers.

>   
>  3. What happened to the floppy driver?
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1579)
> '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:61) Deleting driver
> object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:87) HACK: Not unloading
> the driver image due to critical bugs!
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1961)
> IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:935) Leaking driver:
> floppy.sys
>  
>  Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed?
That's correct behavior. Failing DriverEntry makes the driver immediately
unload. This is broken due to some incorrect memory typing in FreeLoader which results in
invalid loader entries
for boot start drivers after stage 1, which is why we currently act very cautiously and
don't unload to avoid reading invalid memory. This isn't actually a broken case,
but we don't unload
anyway because we have no nice way of knowing whether our LDR entries are valid or not.


>   
>  4. These lines repeated 20 times.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c:811) NtCreateSection()
> failed (Status 0xc0000022).
>  Why creating section in LdrpVerifyImageMatchesChecksum() failes now?
>  
>  5. Win32 stage.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/winsta.c:208) err: Invalid
> window station handle
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/ntuser.c:161) err: Enter
> NtUserInitialize(0, 00000000, 00000000)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/display.c:79) err:
> InitDisplayDriver
>  (\Device\Video0, \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware
> Profiles\Current\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBE\Device0);
>  
>  What happens here? It's a normal bootup, everyone should see this. Why is invalid
> window station handle being passed, why do we need NtUserInitialize to produce ERR debug
> print, along with InitDisplayDriver. Are those errors? If not, then why the hell are they
> being printed? If yes, then I don't see any info about actual errors.
>  
>  6. (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/window.c:2416) err:
> DestroyWindow AOW
>  AOW? ORLY?
>  
>  7. MASSIVE portcls spam. I won't even count lines.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/drivers/wdm/audio/backpln/portcls/undoc.cpp:281)
> Calling Node 16 MajorTarget B01EF750 MinorTarget 00000000 PropertySet
> {45ffaaa0-6e1b-11d0-bcf2-444553540000} PropertyId 4 PropertyFlags 10000200 InstanceSize 0
> ValueSize 40 Handler FB24E58A PropertyRequest FF55B5F8 PropertyItemFlags 203
> PropertyItemId 4
>  A few pages of that stuff. Is it really useful for everyone, including automated testing
> systems? 
I'd agree this is a huge amount of spam that needs to be turned off.

>   
>  8. A work queue deadlock. Not a good thing at all
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c:351) EX: Work Queue Deadlock
> detected: 1 (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c:353) Dynamic threads
> queued 2 
This appears to be the caused by the USB stack. It may not be a direct work
item deadlock but I think it may trigger one elsewhere.

>   
>  9. ???
>  
>  All that resulted from my desire to just compare logs attached to the bug report. New log
> is totally unreadable, I had to spend time figuring out where actually that Live
> Essentials app was started, what problems it shows, etc.
>  
>  
>  Best regards,
>  Aleksey. 
Regards,
Cameron


>   
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Timo Kreuzer]

Am 06.06.2012 17:42, schrieb Cameron Gutman:
>   3. What happened to the floppy driver?
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1579)
> '\Driver\FLOPPY' initialization failed, status (0xc000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:61) Deleting driver
> object '\Driver\FLOPPY'
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:87) HACK: Not unloading
> the driver image due to critical bugs!
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr/driver.c:1961)
> IopInitializeDriver() failed (Status c000000e)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/sysldr.c:935) Leaking driver:
> floppy.sys
>
>  Fix it? Don't enable it in trunk builds if it's buggy and not fixed?
>  That's correct behavior. Failing DriverEntry makes the driver immediately unload.
> This is broken due to some incorrect memory typing in FreeLoader which results in invalid
> loader entries
>  for boot start drivers after stage 1, which is why we currently act very cautiously and
> don't unload to avoid reading invalid memory. This isn't actually a broken case,
> but we don't unload
>  anyway because we have no nice way of knowing whether our LDR entries are valid or not.
Is there a bug report for that? If yes please assign to me.

>  
>
> > 4. These lines repeated 20 times.
> > (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/dll/ntdll/ldr/ldrapi.c:811) NtCreateSection()
> failed (Status 0xc0000022).
> > Why creating section in LdrpVerifyImageMatchesChecksum() failes now?
> >
> > 5. Win32 stage.
> > (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/winsta.c:208) err: Invalid
> window station handle 
This is probably due to the fact that certain parts of the
win32k 
initialization are not being done correctly. So it's a real error and 
someone should investigate it.

>  >
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/ntuser.c:161) err: Enter
> NtUserInitialize(0, 00000000, 00000000)
> > (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/display.c:79) err:
> InitDisplayDriver
> > (\Device\Video0, \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware
> Profiles\Current\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBE\Device0);
> >
> > What happens here? It's a normal bootup, everyone should see this. Why is invalid
> window station handle being passed, why do we need NtUserInitialize to produce ERR debug
> print, along with InitDisplayDriver. Are those errors? If not, then why the hell are they
> being printed? If yes, then I don't see any info about actual errors. 
These
should in fact be demoted to TRACEs

[James Tabor]

On 6/6/12, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>   Hello,
>  it's time for my periodical rant about debug log mess again. The example
>  below is made using latest VirtualBox 3.
>
>  Suggestions and questions:
>  
>  
> (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/ntuser.c:161)
>  err: Enter NtUserInitialize(0, 00000000, 00000000)
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/display.c:79)
>  err: InitDisplayDriver
>  (\Device\Video0, \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware
>  Profiles\Current\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VBE\Device0);
>
>  What happens here? It's a normal bootup, everyone should see this. Why
>  is invalid window station handle being passed, why do we need
>  NtUserInitialize to produce ERR debug print, along with
>  InitDisplayDriver. Are those errors? If not, then why the hell are they
>  being printed? If yes, then I don't see any info about actual errors.
>  
NtUserInitialize when used with Automatic Regression Tests let's know
where we are at during boot. Justin Case of a lockup.

>   6.
>  (/srv/buildbot_cmake/full_cmake/build/win32ss/user/ntuser/window.c:2416)
>  err: DestroyWindow AOW
>  AOW? ORLY?
>  
This one just snicked in...


There is the Release Build to play with, without the debugs....