Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dchapyshev] 34135: - Add fontext.dll

[Heis Spiter]

Once again I agree, and I'd like to add my 2 cents, perhaps it will help.
We need two solutions right now. A short term one, and a long term one.
The short one, purposed by Ged seems, IMO, to be a nice alternative before 
more important work, and seems to be quite easy to realize.
The long one could be a work on rbuild (and makefile) with the hierarchy 
purposed by Ged. And instead of typing make bootcd, we would have to type 
make bootcd X where X would be the additionnal components with hierarchy.

P. Schweitzer

--------------------------------------------------
From: "gedmurphy" [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:19 AM
To: "'ReactOS Development List'" [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dchapyshev] 34135: - Add fontext.dll
> I'm certainly not asking him to stop. But I do think we need a rethink of
> our tree structure.
> The rosapps thing has never been ideal either, so moving stuff into there
> isn't a good solution.
>
> Perhaps we need a hierarchy of components listed for importance. Let's say
> the list ranges from 1 to 10. 1 being core components required to boot the
> OS, 2 being additional components to get to the GUI, etc, with 10 being
> things like these keyboard dlls I used as an earlier example.
>
> However, such a solution isn't a 5 minute job so we do need a quick fix in
> the meantime. Maybe something similar to how rosapps works, with an 
> addition
> to the /modules rbuild file?
>
> Ged.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin
> Sent: 02 July 2008 22:34
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dchapyshev] 34135: - Add fontext.dll
>
> Asking Dmitry to abstain from work would be considered "a hack", not
> "a proper solution".
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey.
>
> On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:45 AM, Heis Spiter wrote:
> > I also agree.
> > About the last point, in Ged's mail, I'm afraid to say I've real
> > difficulties to code with such build time. I'm obliged to work on
> > outdated
> > revisons, and on partial builds. That's really insane.
> >
> > P. Schweitzer
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[James Tabor]

Okay!
make 1
make 2
make 3
..
make 10

LOL, no, really, I'm open to any idea that would make life much more simpler.
James

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Heis Spiter [e-mail] wrote:
> Once again I agree, and I'd like to add my 2 cents, perhaps it will help.
> We need two solutions right now. A short term one, and a long term one.
> The short one, purposed by Ged seems, IMO, to be a nice alternative before
> more important work, and seems to be quite easy to realize.
> The long one could be a work on rbuild (and makefile) with the hierarchy
> purposed by Ged. And instead of typing make bootcd, we would have to type
> make bootcd X where X would be the additionnal components with hierarchy.
>
> P. Schweitzer