Ge van Geldorp wrote:
AFAIK, it is about storing both a long and a short filename for the same file in the same directory.
GvG
Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely?
Ged.
************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
That's needed for 16-Bit App support, Ged, if I recall correctly.
On 1/11/06, Murphy, Ged (Bolton) MurphyG@cmpbatteries.co.uk wrote:
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
AFAIK, it is about storing both a long and a short filename for the same file in the same directory.
GvG
Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely?
Ged.
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke"
Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely?
There was a setting to turn of SFN's in Windows 95, (Or maybe only NT4 on FAT) so it's not totally impossible.
/nitro2k01
-- The blog of nitro2k01: http://soundandcomplete.blogspot.com/ Saliga äro de som kan stava till 2k01! Sniphpha sniphph!
There was a setting to turn of SFN's in Windows 95, (Or maybe only NT4 on FAT) so it's not totally impossible.
NT & Co.:
Under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem
REG_DWORDs: NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation Win31FileSystem Win95TruncatedExtensions
Cheers,
Oliver
No. program loking sometims for the short name of a file. and later for the long name. it depnes how the program is written. bot are need to be save.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Murphy, Ged (Bolton)" MurphyG@cmpbatteries.co.uk To: "'ReactOS Development List'" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: den 11 January 2006 13:48 Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
AFAIK, it is about storing both a long and a short filename for the same file in the same directory.
GvG
Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely?
Ged.
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
The patnet of vfat have been rejected 2004 http://www.pubpat.org/Protecting.htm#FAT%20PATENT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Murphy, Ged (Bolton)" MurphyG@cmpbatteries.co.uk To: "'ReactOS Development List'" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: den 11 January 2006 13:48 Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
AFAIK, it is about storing both a long and a short filename for the same file in the same directory.
GvG
Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely?
Ged.
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I disabled 8+3 filename creation in Windows some time ago - the whole system was fusked up then - I had to reinstall it.
Christoph v. Wittich
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 08:32, Christoph von Wittich wrote:
I disabled 8+3 filename creation in Windows some time ago - the whole system was fusked up then - I had to reinstall it.
Christoph v. Wittich
Said site is out of date. USPTO has released it's finding that the patent is valid. See previous post which has a link to the relevant news story.
DRH
I have disabled 8.3 filenames on svn.reactos.org. It gave me 10% speedup when copying a ReactOS Subversion working copy.
Casper
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Christoph von Wittich Sent: 11. januar 2006 14:32 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I disabled 8+3 filename creation in Windows some time ago - the whole system was fusked up then - I had to reinstall it.
Christoph v. Wittich
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I have disabled 8.3 filenames on svn.reactos.org. It gave me 10% speedup when copying a ReactOS Subversion working copy.
Casper
Try to install Symantec AntiVirus now - it does not work anymore :)
Christoph v. Wittich
From: Magnus Olsen
The patnet of vfat have been rejected 2004 http://www.pubpat.org/Protecting.htm#FAT%20PATENT
That was a non-final ruling. See http://news.com.com/Microsofts+file+system+patent+upheld/2100-1012_3-6025447 .html?part=rss&tag=6025447&subj=news for the latest news (patent upheld).
GvG
Magnus Olsen wrote:
The patnet of vfat have been rejected 2004 http://www.pubpat.org/Protecting.htm#FAT%20PATENT
Yeah, I remember some thing about it. We are okay to use the VFAT. James
Hi,
I think we should turn off the 8.3 short filename support by default and see what breaks. Providing a option right at the start of 2nd stage step "Patented features" using a checkbox to enable it should get us around the issue. Its not our problem if someone else enables it.
-- Steven Edwards - ReactOS and Wine developer
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
Steven Edwards wrote:
Hi,
I think we should turn off the 8.3 short filename support by default and see what breaks. Providing a option right at the start of 2nd stage step "Patented features" using a checkbox to enable it should get us around the issue. Its not our problem if someone else enables it.
Hi, Until we receive correspondence from the patent holder, we do nothing.
But,, it is good, if we do receive something, we have a plan. 8^) James
I believe that if you want the FAT partition to interoperate with Windows, you need the short filename. IIRC the LFN dirents all have a checksum pointing associating them with the SFN dirent that actually has the initial cluster value.
You would probably be better off removing LFN support instead.
If you don't want to interoperate with Windows none of that matters... ;-)
Keep up the good work guys.
--mark
Quoting James Tabor jimtabor@adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net:
Steven Edwards wrote:
Hi,
I think we should turn off the 8.3 short filename support by default and see what breaks. Providing a option right at the start of 2nd stage step "Patented features" using a checkbox to enable it should get us around the issue. Its not our problem if someone else enables it.
Hi, Until we receive correspondence from the patent holder, we do nothing.
But,, it is good, if we do receive something, we have a plan. 8^) James _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev