João Jerónimo Barata de Oliveira schrieb:
David Hinz wrote:

  
I don't think such a step in our setup would be useful, because nearly
nobody (of the users) wants to configure the look and feel of his
bootloader, and every step you add to the setup makes it more
difficult for the user.
    


Yes... a agree about the look and feel... but I meant the whole boot
loader config, not (only) the look and feel...
And there's always a solution: automatic configuration for people who
don't like to concern/don't know much about boot loader configuration...

  
I think wo should choose a default and everybody who doesn't like it
may change the settings in his freeldr.ini.
    


No... doing things in Microsoft's way no, thanks... I think ROS
shouldn't clone that philosophy of making the things so easy even if it
makes the software dangerous... because if you have no control about the
boot loader configuration, usetup can break other operating system's...

It happens the same when usetup doesn't distinguishes logical from
primary partitions...

João Jerónimo

	

	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Acesso Gr�tis: Internet r�pida e gr�tis. 
Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general

  
I didn't know, you want to configure the bootloader in usetup.
That really is a good idea, but I don't think we should add the possibility to configure the look and feel of freeloader to usetup.

Greets,

David Hinz