You are right, you're not alone.

It would be very nice Justin, if you could explain us, what you are doing here. Most of your mails I read seem to have nearly nothing to do with ROS.

Greets,

David Hinz

Thomas Weidenmueller schrieb: 
jwalsh@bigpond.net.au wrote:
  
I take it you are saying, no it is not an issue worth pursuing.

I'm interested if there might be an similar solid opinion regarding the other points as well.

So from your explanation it sounds like a good thing i.e taking something which is well grounded and building on it. Forward to perfection so to speak.

I must admit that I have not as yet had good results: It simply does not work on my stock standard Thankpad 600E. [Please I am not asking for it either]. learning about it is the way I work.
    

I really wish i'd understand what you're trying to accomplish here at
all. I've read most of your posts and I just don't it. I don't think it
makes much sense spending time thinking/discussing about failed theories
or technologies that failed decades ago, we're not going to revive them
no matter how good they seem. There's a reason they're not used anymore.

Again, I wish i understood the purpose of all these threads here - and I
guess I'm not the only person.

- Thomas
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general