ea(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>Required for binary compatibility with MS KERNEL32.DLL.
>
>NOTE
>Filip and I still don't understand why KERNEL32 calls twice CsrConnectToServer.
>A possible explanation is because the Win32 server is a dual server: gui+console.
>
>
yes. It connects to subsystems 1 and 2. In general, all CSR calls made
by kernel32.dll are easily identifiable as calls to either subsystem
from their code (the subsystem code is in the upper 16 bits). The GUI
subsystem's functions, if you were wondering, are:
SrvExitWindowsEx
SrvEndTask
SrvLogon
SrvRegisterServicesProcess
SrvActivateDebugger
SrvGetThreadConsoleDesktop
SrvDeviceEvent
SrvRegisterLogonProcess
SrvCreateSystemThreads
SrvRecordShutdownReason
ea(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>Required for binary compatibility with MS KERNEL32.DLL.
>
>
>
I don't understand this change; it is incorrect. MS kernel32.dll sends
the name of the port.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
ea(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>Required for binary compatibility with MS KERNEL32.DLL.
>
>NOTE
>Filip and I still don't understand why KERNEL32 calls twice CsrConnectToServer.
>
Once to connect to the Base Server, and once to connect to the Console
server.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
I plan to implement these in the near future ..... unless someone else does
it first.
I currently have reworked code for tracert, arp, netstat, ipconfig, pathping
and route I will start to commit over the next few weeks.
I then plan to implement other services and apps in relation to networking,
including test apps.
Ged.
-----Original Message-----
From: WaxDragon [mailto:waxdragon@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 September 2005 06:25
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Priorities
I'm would be very interested in a set of network "simple services"
like echo, chargen, daytime, etc.. Having those on the install would
help ReactOS get some wider network testing.
WD
On 9/23/05, Rick Langschultz <rlangschultz(a)cox.net> wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a priority list for the next release.
> Whether it be 0.2.8 or 0.3.0 I would either like to work on
> implementing services and/or tcp/ip based networking. Primarily
> though, getting services up and running would be great for me who
> develops services.
> Rick Langschultz
> rlangschultz(a)cox.net (Home)
> rlangschultz(a)ellemaespa.com (Work)
> rlangschultz(a)email.uophx.edu (School)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
--
<arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
I was wondering if there was a priority list for the next release.
Whether it be 0.2.8 or 0.3.0 I would either like to work on
implementing services and/or tcp/ip based networking. Primarily
though, getting services up and running would be great for me who
develops services.
Rick Langschultz
rlangschultz(a)cox.net (Home)
rlangschultz(a)ellemaespa.com (Work)
rlangschultz(a)email.uophx.edu (School)
As one of our main features for 0.3, we can't progress out of the 0.2.*
releases until it is either complete, or the goalposts are moved.
With nobody working on networking at the moment, 0.2.8 seems likely and I'm
starting to wonder how far into the 0.2.* releases we are going to go.
Also, at what stage will the network model be enough to satisfy a 0.3
release?
Does this just mean stable, basic TCP/IP with basic ws2_32 support?
How many drivers need to be supported?
What about service providers for ws2_32.dll (Mswsock.dll is stubbed apart
from TransmitFile, and Wshtcpip.dll is non existent)
What about NDIS?
Change in circumstances has just released most of my evenings now, however
although I'm starting to work on networking apps, and hopefully soon User
Mode code, my coding skills and windows knowledge are not yet up to a level
where I can tackle the more in-depth stuff, especially kernel mode (eek)
Does any one plan to, or is anyone going to volunteer to take up networking?
I would be more than happy to throw all my spare time into helping them in
any way possible.
If we glean some information from this email, I can start to document it in
the wiki (we don't have much networking documentation in there at the
moment)
Regards,
Ged.
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Try using a crack and seeing if it works then. I know there was work done on DirectDraw, so you might have some luck.
> Glad I could help you, and help get my favorite game working on ReactOS.
>
> BTW, the colors on the liltle setup title program (or whatever you call
> it) where weird. Just skin deep, and starcraft finished installation as
> usual. However, it fails the CD test as it usually does.
>
> Ge van Geldorp wrote:
>
> >>From: Reuben Perelman
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> >>>Does the patch below fix this?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yes it does.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Ok, thanks for testing. The patch is an ugly hack and I don't want to commit
> >it. But at least I know what's going on now and can think about a better
> >patch.
> >
> >Ge van Geldorp.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ros-dev mailing list
> >Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev