Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

3 participants
5789 discussions

by Magnus Olsen

Hi everyone have notice ReactOS website, svn, mailing list, went down. The svn and web server was never down the problem was the DNS server whent down by hardware failour and it took time getting it back online again. Longer that we did expect.

18 years, 2 months

Code Auditing 100% Complete

by Nate DeSimone

Hi everyone, I noticed that the code audit is now finished. Cheers!

18 years, 2 months

Rev 24626 Breaks Linux Build

by James Tabor

I've tried fixing this! 8^( include/psdk/winnt.h line 3666 is the orig. [CC] subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c In file included from subsystems/win32/win32k/w32k.h:16, from subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c:20: include/ddk/ntifs.h:404: error: redeclaration of `enum _AUDIT_EVENT_TYPE' include/ddk/ntifs.h:405: error: conflicting types for 'AuditEventObjectAccess' include/psdk/winnt.h:3666: error: previous definition of 'AuditEventObjectAccess' was here include/ddk/ntifs.h:407: error: conflicting types for 'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess' include/psdk/winnt.h:3668: error: previous definition of 'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess' was here

18 years, 2 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [ion] 24636: - Add NtApphelpCacheControl, NtFilterToken (WARNING: PATENTED. TAKE CARE WHEN IMPLEMENTING). - Add all the recently added functions to their proper place in the NDK.

by Reuel ben Yisrael

ion(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: ion > Date: Tue Oct 24 01:19:15 2006 > New Revision: 24636 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=24636&view=rev > Log: > - Add NtApphelpCacheControl, NtFilterToken (WARNING: PATENTED. TAKE CARE WHEN IMPLEMENTING). > I'm assuming that the warning is in reference to NtFilterToken(). If someone other than you goes to implement this function, they probably won't look through svn history to see this comment. Wouldn't it be best to put a warning like this in the comments of the function source?

18 years, 2 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [ion] 24595: - Implement DbgkpQueueMessage. This is the main bi-directional communication routine for the newer non-LPC Debug Object. - Implement DbgkPostFakeProcessCreateMessages (and stub DbgkpPostFakeThreadMessages and DbgkpPostFakeModuleMessages). These are required when attaching to a process after threads have been created and modules loaded, so that the debugger can have a valid state. - Still missing the two functions to Set/Clear the Debug Object, will do these next.

by Thomas Weidenmueller

> - RtlCopyMemory(StateChange, > + /* Return our wait state change structure */ > + RtlMoveMemory(StateChange, > &WaitStateChange, > sizeof(DBGUI_WAIT_STATE_CHANGE)); RtlMoveMemory doesn't really make sense as the destination and source are never overlapping, resulting in unnecessary overhead. - Thomas

18 years, 3 months

Automated Testing

by Lucio Diaz

Aleksey Bragin wrote: "It should try every revision, otherwise there is no use from it at all. And automerge from trunk to stable branch is not possible, because patches usually depend on each other." Sorry,i explained myself wrong, i was not talking about automerging, or using the "stable branch" to send patches. No, patches would be still sent to the unstable branch, and no "automerging will be used", it will be just overwriting. The process i imagine like this: -Unestable not working. -Recent Stable working (1 day old). -You dont have the skill to fix unstable. -You download stable, work in your computer over stable. -Send changes to unstable (then things become interesting). -Check the files you are have touched. If no other person have touched them since the stable (1 day old) was made you can send your patches, if someone have touched, you cant and have to wait till the stable revision is updated. -Once unstable boot again, stable is override by the unstable, and now named stable. This would alow people working, maybe in the control panel, with little kernel or booting code knowledge, keep working without having to stop developing for dificult bugs in the kernel. What do you thing? Maybe is a crazy idea cause i dont know about the inners of SVN. ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com

18 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [janderwald] 24590: - provide a sample configurat ion file - allow other address line resolver than addr2line

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

> +; > +; ROSBOOT_CMD > +; > +; This value is the command which is executed to gain debugging data > +; this value is mandatory > + > +ROSBOOT_CMD=D:\sysreg\qemu\qemu.exe -serial file:debug.log > -boot c -m 128 -L D:\sysreg\qemu\ D:\sysreg\qemu\RosVM.vmdk > -cdrom D:\Reactos\ReactOS-RegTest.iso Is there scope to add vmware to the test? Ged.

18 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [janderwald] 24584: * beginning of a system regression tools

by Alex Ionescu

janderwald(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: janderwald > Date: Fri Oct 20 19:49:46 2006 > New Revision: 24584 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=24584&view=rev > Log: > * beginning of a system regression tools > Can this be done in C? C++ only slows down the build even more. -- Best regards, Alex Ionescu Project Lead, TinyKRNL Kernel-Mode Software Design Engineer, ReactOS

18 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] Interested in the Testing Coordinator position

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

I hate ugly text formatting ... Resending in a (hopefully) readable format. Jerry wrote: > After a team says that it has fixed the bug ... <snip> > Each team may have mentees associated with it. The teams would then > help and guide their mentees in testing and coding, and these mentees > will help with the work load that the regular testers have. The goal > here is to guide the mentees to be regular developers and either stay > in testing or move on to other parts of the project and have. I'm a little confused with the idea of the testing teams fixing bugs. Testers aren't usually coders. It's great if they are as they can fix the bugs they find, but in general testing positions are filled by people who want to help the project, but aren't programmers. If a tester is a programmer too, I think you'll find that do a lot more programming than testing, as shown by our tree instability at the moment ;) Ged.

18 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] Interested in the Testing Coordinator position

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

Jerry wrote: > After a team says that it has fixed the bug ... <snip> > Each team may have mentees associated with it. The teams would then help > and guide their mentees in testing and coding, and these mentees will help > with the work load that the regular testers have. The goal here is to guide > the mentees to be regular developers and either stay in testing or move on to > other parts of the project and have. I'm a little confused with the idea of the testing teams fixing bugs. Testers aren't usually coders. It's great if they are as they can fix the bugs they find, but in general testing positions are filled by people who want to help the project, but aren't programmers. If a tester is a programmer too, I think you'll find that do a lot more programming than testing, as shown by our tree instability at the moment ;) Ged.

18 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev