Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

1 participants
5793 discussions

New build system ready for trunk
by Casper Hornstrup 28 May '05

28 May '05

Hi. I believe the new build system is ready to replace the current build system in trunk. Unless there are objections, I plan on merging the branch to trunk in the weekend of 27 - 29 of may. I'd like to take the opportunity to thank everyone that helped make this possible - especially Royce Mitchell III, Ge van Geldorp, and Steven Edwards. It would be nice if you could checkout the branch and check that the features you can't live without are still there so we can have them ready before the merge. If you have major new feature requests that are not essential, I'd like to put them on hold until after the merge. To checkout the branch do a: svn co svn://svn.reactos.com/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos For a list of environment variables that controls the build see: http://svn.reactos.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos/M… For more technical information see: http://svn.reactos.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos/t… This is not a 100% solution to our dependency problems though. There can still be corner-cases where it is needed to manually clean some files, but it will be needed a lot less than today. Also in order to have acceptable performance, we cannot check dependencies on every included file on each make invocation. Therefore, this is currently only checked each time the automatically generated makefile (makefile.auto) is regenerated. Makefile.auto is regenerated each time a build system file (*.xml) is modified. If you need to check the dependencies on files not specified in the build system files "automatic dependencies", then delete makefile.auto and run make again. Casper

6 9

Re: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 15570: Use W32API.
by Alex Ionescu 28 May '05

28 May '05

navaraf(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Use W32API. > > >Updated files: >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/Makefile >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/dump.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/jitter.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/openclos.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/packet.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/packet.h >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/read.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/win_bpf.h >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/write.c > >_______________________________________________ >Ros-svn mailing list >Ros-svn(a)reactos.com >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > > This breaks the dbg=0 build because of the ASSERT macro in winddk.h. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

1 1

Re: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 15574: Bye, bye "include/net/" directory...
by Alex Ionescu 28 May '05

28 May '05

navaraf(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Bye, bye "include/net/" directory... > > >Deleted files: >trunk/reactos/include/net/ > >_______________________________________________ >Ros-svn mailing list >Ros-svn(a)reactos.com >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > > This breaks the build because lib/packet can't find the net include files anymore. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

1 0

Re: [ros-svn] [greatlrd] 15482: VBE driver never write which reslutions it should use as defualt
by Gge 28 May '05

28 May '05

greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > VBE driver never write which reslutions it should use as defualt > therefor the change resultions did not working on bootcd > do not remove this settings. from the reg. > Thanks > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/bootdata/hivesys.inf > This is already possible in the "hiveinst.file" It should be only in one place Regards Gge

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] All months again: New Release
by Steven Edwards 27 May '05

27 May '05

--- Robert K�pferl <rob(a)koepferl.de> wrote: > we're stright aproaching a new release. > Or at first: A branch. > What about the version number? As far as I followed the discussions, 0.3 > is still away :-( . > > And how about our new build system. Is it successfully running? > I for my part would feel more comfortable if the next > intermediate-release would still use the old build system. I would rather wait till Casper merges rbuild and we get it stable then tag a release. There is no point in stablising the tree to just break it again in another week or two. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] Build Error
by Filip Navara 27 May '05

27 May '05

1 0

compile warning at kd/kdinit.c with gcc 3.3.1 on win32
by Theodor Willax 27 May '05

27 May '05

Hi, have problems to compile revison 15501. See below: D:\home\willaxt\Entwicklung\ROS\src\reactos>make crt: [DEPENDS] wine/.cppexcept.d crt: [DEPENDS] wine/.cpp.d crt: [CC] wine/cpp.c crt: [CC] wine/cppexcept.c crt: [AR] ../../dk/w32/lib/libcrt.a freeldr: Tools are up to date. freeldr: Tools are up to date. ===================================================== Assembling fat ===================================================== Assembling fat32 freeldr: Compiling mm/mm freeldr: Compiling freeldr freeldr: LINKING freeldr.sys freeldr: LINKING setupldr.sys freeldr: Make ALL done. ntoskrnl: [DEPENDS] ob/.object.d ntoskrnl: [CC] kd/kdinit.c kd/kdinit.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type kd/kdinit.c:25: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type kd/kdinit.c:26: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type make[1]: *** [kd/kdinit.o] Error 1 make: *** [ntoskrnl] Error 2 D:\home\willaxt\Entwicklung\ROS\src\reactos>gcc -v Reading specs from D:/home/willaxt/Entwicklung/ROS/tool/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc-lib /mingw32/3.3.1/specs Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host= mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable -languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada,java --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared --e nable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-libgcj --disable-java-awt --without-x --enable-ja va-gc=boehm --disable-libgcj-debug --enable-interpreter --enable-hash-synchroniz ation Thread model: win32 gcc version 3.3.1 (mingw special 20030804-1) Did a complete new check out before. Could this be a compiler problem. Am I using the right gcc version. Thanks for help, Theo ------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Theodor Willax, Moosburg http://www.willax-online.de ------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ So einfach geht das. MSN Toolbar mit Pop-up-Blocker. http://toolbar.msn.de/ Jetzt kostenlos downloaden und gut ist!

1 1

Static IP behavior with dhcp service
by Gge 27 May '05

27 May '05

Hi, Dynamic IP is not working actually for some unknown reason in my Ros real hardware as dhcp DISCSCOVERmessage sent to dhcp server (my router) by dhcp client has no reply ( noDHCPOFFER received in Ros) This configuration is working fine in window but it is broken in my box ( don't know why it is broken but this happened already once ) . As a alternative solution I setup Hivesys.inf for static IP and I got the same dialog problem between dhpcp client and dhcp server . => the dhpc client service should not sent a DHCPDISCOVER message to the dhcp server if the IP address is static in Hivesys.inf ( so different of "0.0.0.0") => The Ip address setup in Hivesys.ing must be taken into account in that case. I have created the Bug 639 for this issue The test has been done with svn 15447 Regards Gge

2 3

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 15492: Nonpaged Pool Liberation Day: Allow PagedPool to be used earlier, allow fast mutex to be used earlier on debug builds. Allocate all Se stuff from PagedPool, set the right object types to use paged pool, allocate all strings from paged pool, allocate PE sections from paged pool, and a bunch of other things which should, imo, be in paged pool. If anyone has any contradicting proof, let me know...until then, enjoy ~4-6MB more NonPagedPool
by Hartmut Birr 27 May '05

27 May '05

ion(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Nonpaged Pool Liberation Day: Allow PagedPool to be used earlier, allow fast mutex to be used earlier on debug builds. Allocate all Se stuff from PagedPool, set the right object types to use paged pool, allocate all strings from paged pool, allocate PE sections from paged pool, and a bunch of other things which should, imo, be in paged pool. If anyone has any contradicting proof, let me know...until then, enjoy ~4-6MB more NonPagedPool > > > > Hi, I don't like the exchange from NonPagedPool to PagePool at the current state of ros. There are two reasons: A) The allocation of paged pool is very slowly compared with the non paged pool allocation. B) Since the change to the new object type structures, ros has a big memory leakage in the memory (pool) allocation/deallocation of objects. For the non paged pool, there exist some debug functions to find the problem. The paged pool doesn't implement anything to find such problems. - Hartmut

2 7

Re: [ros-dev] Fwd: Status update and voting
by Steven Edwards 27 May '05

27 May '05

Hi Jason, --- Jason Filby <jason.filby(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Vizzini has officially stepped down from the kernel coordinator > position. It's a pity that legalities and the nature of his business > have put him in this position. I've expressed our thanks for his input > and contributions to the project to Vizzini. Thats sad to hear. We hope to see you again soon Vizzini. > The kernel coordinator position will be up for vote for nominiated > candidates. This will only happen after the UI team has settled. Can we go ahead and start the nomination process and discussion now? There are a few people that would be nice to see in this role, Filip, Hartmut, Alex, James, Hpoussin, Art, did I forget anyone else? I would like to hear from each of them on if they would even want the job? I am leaning towards Alex currently for my nomination because he has the most time to focus on the kernel and has shown a lot of initiative though I don't always agree with his development and research methods so someone else could get my nomination and or vote. > In case you're wondering, the project coordinator position, which I've > been sitting on for around 7/8 years now, will also be up for vote in > the near future. This will only happen once we've nailed down a > constitution for the project (and no, I'm not leaving the project, > just opening things up). Well lets get moving. Not that I want to see you gone or anything =) but your we do need to move forward with this and I need to get some real business plans together for the foundation stuff. BTW I am taking vacation for the next few days from my day job and one of the things on my TODO list is to talk to the Legal people about the trademark stuff again. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

8 8

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev