Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

1 participants
5793 discussions

Reactos directory created in Recatos local tree when building Ros = Unexpected
by Gge 31 May '05

31 May '05

I built Ros with svn 15689 after a checkout ( mingw32-make ) and I noticed that a Reactos Directory is created in the Reactos source directory . This is not needed. D:\Gerard\Reactos\Svn\reactos\reactos>dir Volume in drive D has no label. Volume Serial Number is C4F7-46D4 Directory of D:\Gerard\Reactos\Svn\reactos\reactos 30/05/2005 23:16 <DIR> . 30/05/2005 23:16 <DIR> .. 30/05/2005 23:16 <DIR> inf 30/05/2005 23:16 <DIR> media 30/05/2005 23:16 <DIR> system32 0 File(s) 0 bytes 5 Dir(s) 3 877 736 448 bytes free D:\Gerard\Reactos\Svn\reactos\reactos> Regards Gerard

1 0

UI Coordinator Vote
by Jason Filby 31 May '05

31 May '05

Hi all We need to vote on the UI Coordinator Vote. This will take 2 weeks according to our voting rules and only committers may participate. If you're not listed as a committer but participate in the project in an important way (testing/web work) then talk to an existing committer to get a recommendation. For voting rules see: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/Voting Regards Jason

3 3

ReactOS IRC Group Contact Information
by Alex Ionescu 31 May '05

31 May '05

Hi, Since not all the developers are on IRC and/or are aware of this, I wanted to make the following announcement so that future requests/flames can go to the right person (ie: me). I have registered ReactOS as an official group with Freenode, and we now have full, legitimate control over #reactos and all #reactos-**** channels (as well as ros-dev but there is (and has always been) a remote risk some new project called "ROS" might come and dispute that)) and enjoy all the benefits of an actual group registration. Since I am the group contact, that means that any requests that cannot be done by yourselves as operators (ie: major changes, like requesting a cloak) should be sent to me, and I'll take care of them ASAP. I'm also currently fixing the IRC Access Lists so they work properly (people would get operator status but not auto-voice, and other such silly things). I have already fixed up #ros-dev so that Level 10ers get +v, Level 20ers +o and Level 40ers have almost unlimited access. Similarly to before, all the devs have been set to have this access level (40). In the old system some people were 45, some were 46, some 47, etc, which kind of made everything seem awkard (ie: "why is developer foo 44 but developer bar 47? is bar more 'powerful'?). This resulted because instead of having a single person assign the access, everyone tried their best, but people can only give one access level lower then what they already are. So in the future, just send me a pm/email and I'll add the proper access for a new dev. But that won't be a problem since I'm 24/7 on IRC and I doubt I would not notice a new developer :). Tomorrow I'll be fixing up #reactos, which suffers from even bigger access level problems. Apart from making you aware of the fact that I'm here to help for any IRC-related business, I also wanted to say that I can now assign you user cloaks! This means that instead of being kjk_hyperion(a)some.random.italian.dsl.isp.it you can now be kjk_hyperion(a)developers.reactos. I will also be handing out @users.reactos or @testers.reactos for people who are not developers but have been helping us quite a lot (one notable example is WaxDragon, or tinus, etc). We can of course even have @webteam.reactos or @translators.reactos...etc. The main advantages of a cloak is that 1) people know you're with us, and what your position is 2) Your actual ISP/Hostname/IP is hidden from the public, so you don't need to worry about script kiddies 3) It's cool (imo) So here's what I'll be needing from you if you want to be cloaked: (CONTRIBUTORS ONLY FOR NOW, PLEASE!) 1) Your IRC Nickname and IRC Alternate Nickname (you *must* set one up...and your nickname *must* have been registered to a valid e-mail address) 2) Your choice of cloak... recommendations: (developer.reactos, translator.reactos, media (or designer? or ui?).reactos, board.reactos) PM me on IRC or send me an e-mail with the above information and you should have your cloak in less then a day. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] XML-Build and rosapps
by Steven Edwards 30 May '05

30 May '05

Hi, --- Maarten Bosma <maarten.paul(a)bosma.de> wrote: > Maarten Bosma wrote: > > I just want to point out that thunk/posix, trunk/os2, trunk/vms and > > rosapps are still using the old build system. > > I forgot the bad thing, they can't use it if it's not there. Fixing rosapps is on my TODO list for the next week. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

1 0

Re: [ros-svn] [gvg] 15685: Revert some incorrect changes that were made during rbuild merge
by Hartmut Birr 30 May '05

30 May '05

gvg(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Revert some incorrect changes that were made during rbuild merge > > > >Updated files: >trunk/reactos/tools/wrc/parser.y >trunk/reactos/tools/wrc/y.tab.c >trunk/reactos/tools/wrc/y.tab.h > >_______________________________________________ >Ros-svn mailing list >Ros-svn(a)reactos.com >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > Hi, after this commit, I get the following build error: [WRC] obj-i386\lib\cpl\appwiz\appwiz.coff lib\\cpl\\appwiz\\/Cz.rc:11:41: Error: parse error _make: *** [obj-i386\lib\cpl\appwiz\appwiz.coff] Error 1 - Hartmut

2 1

All months again: New Release
by Robert Köpferl 30 May '05

30 May '05

Hi, we're stright aproaching a new release. Or at first: A branch. What about the version number? As far as I followed the discussions, 0.3 is still away :-( . And how about our new build system. Is it successfully running? I for my part would feel more comfortable if the next intermediate-release would still use the old build system.

7 10

svn.reactos.com maintenance
by Casper Hornstrup 30 May '05

30 May '05

Hi. Within the next 3 hours, I'll be taking the svn.reactos.com box down for maintenance. I expect it to take less than 30 minutes. Casper

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] RE: [greatlrd] 15646: Remove two file that are not need anylonger
by Sylvain Petreolle 29 May '05

29 May '05

`Remove two file that are not need any longer fix some compilings warings' <== --- Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.com> a écrit: > > From: greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com > > > > Updated files: > > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabextract.c > > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabinet_main.c > > What's the purpose of the changes you made to these two files? > > Gé van Geldorp. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

2 1

RE: [greatlrd] 15646: Remove two file that are not need anylonger
by Ge van Geldorp 29 May '05

29 May '05

> From: greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabextract.c > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabinet_main.c What's the purpose of the changes you made to these two files? Gé van Geldorp.

1 0

RBuild woes...
by Alex Ionescu 28 May '05

28 May '05

Hi, Here is my beef with rbuild. I can't fix most of these as I don't have the skills/knowledge of rbuild. 1) Project link flags are applied at the end of the command line...this makes -Wl optimization flags not work. 2) DBG = 0 and GCC 4 creates a load of new warnings that weren't there before. For example, I can't build ntoskrnl anymore. This is because it's detecting "uninitialized variables" which are actually being initalized by the macros themselves (see mm/pe.c and elf.inc.h). This did not happen before rbuild. 3) Strip isn't being executed for dbg = 0 anymore... I can add it but I have no idea how to make it dbg = 0 only. Not sure: 4) Is the OPTIMIZED envirovar still taken into account? I didn't seem to see so. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

3 10

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev