Re: [ros-dev] RE: What Happened

[Wesley Parish]

On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:26, David Eckert wrote:
>   Allow me to just put it this way, reverse engineering
> IS illegal, 
And Microsoft explicitly permits it in their "Inside Windows [NT | 2000 | XP]" 
books - they even allow that most prolific reverse-engineer of NT, Mark 
Russinovich, to put most of his sysinternals website on the cdrom included 
with the Microsoft Press book "Inside Windows 2000".

There's a legal doctrine called "unclean hands" - google for "define:
unclean 
hands" and you'll see that Microsoft has not a leg to stand on.  Unless the 
judges are irredeemably corrupt, which isn't impossible.

Wesley Parish
>   HOWEVER even Microsoft reverse-engingeers stuff that
> they want to know
>  how it works and to write drivers/etc for, so I still don't see the
>  point of why anyone would have a problem, it's not like ReactOS is the
>  first to utilize reverse-engineering practices to learn something, and
>  secondly I'd like to point out by the information I have studied,
>  ReactOS DOESN'T have Windows source code in it (at least by the
>  current facts, no) it was suspected that so due to a certain crash
>  that looked similar in terms of debugging very identicle to Windows.
>
>  --
>  -David W. Eckert
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
-- 
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.