17 Sep
2010
17 Sep
'10
11:06 a.m.
I have a question: where is the list of unresolved issues?
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:01:30 +1000, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
wrote:
As for existing 0.3.12-milestone entries in the
BugZilla, I think they
fully make sense because vast majority of them are regressions, and most
of them already have one or another >solution ready.
Please allow a few more days of the trunk feature freeze, until the list
of unresolved 0.3.12 issues is empty. I know how much annoying that is,
but it's for the good of the project.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote:
--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
As we progress into regression fixing, we are now
in the good moment to
decide upon upcoming release. It would be great if we could manage with
the 0.3.12 for the >>October Chemnitz event, where we are invited again
to participate, not to mention that its the time for such release.
Right now, in my opinion we should decide without futher delay on the
following:
- reviewing the REGRESSION list, this is - to confirm entries with
0.3.12 milestone already set, as well as doublecheck the rest, to see
if any should be promoted to said >>milestone. This is the action of
most utter importance, as there is no way to know how much time will be
spent on futher research, testing and fixing them;
- decide upon bugs originated with last ole/comctl sync - are we haxing
them locally, risking another winesync or perhaps reverting?
- reviewing patches stored at http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Bug_Filters
as well as deciding if any should be adapted for current release.
Those actions, first of them especially, should be performed as swift
as possible, else we might risk considerable delay and nervous finish
before the Chemnitz.