16 Jan
2010
16 Jan
'10
1:57 p.m.
I'm not really sure what you expect anyone to say. There's thousands of
things that need doing, we can't start listing everything.
Contrary to your beliefs, we aren't available to walk every interested
person through the process of working out what they are interested in, what
their skill set allows and what they can work on. This is something
developers work out for themselves.
The general rule is 'you can work on anything that interests you'.
Everything needs work, there's virtually no module that's complete.
Ged.
If someone came along and said "I'm
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:40 PM, victor martinez <vicmarcal(a)hotmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Then,Aleksey,as Coordinator,May you suggest any
area,or any task,that we
do really need to have done,and that Sudhir can help in?
All of you were saying that you like the sincerity.Ok,this is my small
point of sincerity about this situation(jump it if you wish):
[Small-Point-of-Sincerity]
I´m really worried about finding that this team is unable to tell him a
small list of possible tasks to be accomplished,or even more, just ONE.
If i recall correctly one of the points we are interested in,is introducing
ReactOS in the University,so students get interested in helping ROS for
their Career Projects,and maybe continuing here as Developers when finishing
their studies.
How are we going to do that when we arent able to write a List of Concise
Tasks??Are we going to lose the opportunity of introducing ReactOS in Sudhir
University, so maybe we can create a relationship with that University and
his Teacher for future PR??
OKAY. Sudhir,give a look to this page:
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Missing_ReactOS_Functionality It is maybe
quite general, but i hope maybe you can find an interesting place to work
in.
I´m quite dissapointed with finding that Testers(thanks Elhoir,thanks
Gabriel) are trying to give answers to this guy from our limited
knowledge,while our Devs still remains in the most complete silence.And the
few Devs that have answered were just to say a "No,No" instead a
"No,no,but
you can try to implement XXXX".Discouraging instead Redirecting. Quite
interesting to discover that People here tends towards answering Dramas
instead Helping the project.
We are in 0.3.11, we want to reach 1.0, that means (1.0-0.3.X=)0.7
releases-full-of-implementations ahead.Can´t we tell him just ONE of them?
[/Small-Point-of-Sincerity]
Swallow the sincerity as you wish or throw it to the Delete folder ignoring
that something has to change here for the Project Welfare.
Best regards and hammering yours..
------------------------------
Windows 7 es fácil, cómodo y sin complicaciones.
¡Conócelo!<http://www.sietesunpueblodeexpertos.com/index_windows7.html>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev