No. Not even coverity seems to have caught this.
Am 16.10.2014 07:59, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
  Wow, does static analyzer really not catch this?
 Best regards,
 Alex Ionescu
 On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:03 PM, <tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org
 <mailto:tkreuzer@svn.reactos.org>> wrote:
     Author: tkreuzer
     Date: Wed Oct 15 22:03:50 2014
     New Revision: 64757
     URL: 
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=64757&view=rev
     Log:
     [NTOSKRNL]
     Don't use an uninitialized variable in MmArmAccessFault (Alex,
     please review). Brought to you by MSVC runtime checks.
     Modified:
         trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
     Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
     URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.…
     ==============================================================================
     --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c   [iso-8859-1]
     (original)
     +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c   [iso-8859-1] Wed
     Oct 15 22:03:50 2014
     @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@
          NTSTATUS Status;
          PMMSUPPORT WorkingSet;
          ULONG ProtectionCode;
     -    PMMVAD Vad;
     +    PMMVAD Vad = NULL;
          PFN_NUMBER PageFrameIndex;
          ULONG Color;
          BOOLEAN IsSessionAddress;
 _______________________________________________
 Ros-dev mailing list
 Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
 
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev