Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 44508: updates EFLAGS definitions

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

i hope you dont mean we no-devs cant discuss stuff and even learn from you

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote:

>  
>
> >   Ergo, we may define them to correctly reflect the
> > EFLAGS register. 
>  Who is "WE"? You're not even a DEV for this project!
>
> >  
> >  However, but I think Alex is right that the compatible identifiers
> >  should be retained.
> >  EFLAG_SIGN and EFLAG_ZERO  are used to compare flags in AH after LAHF,
> >  and should be retained verbatim, since they are public (in NTDDK.H).
> >  As for any MS EFLAGS_xx definitions, I'm not privvy and can't say. 
>  Then shut up and don't post completely USELESS and wrong information.
>
>