Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 44508: updates EFLAGS definitions

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

i hope you dont mean we no-devs cant discuss stuff and even learn from you

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alex Ionescu [e-mail] wrote:
> > Ergo, we may define them to correctly reflect the EFLAGS register.
>
> Who is "WE"? You're not even a DEV for this project!
> > However, but I think Alex is right that the compatible identifiers
> > should be retained.
> > EFLAG_SIGN and EFLAG_ZERO  are used to compare flags in AH after LAHF,
> > and should be retained verbatim, since they are public (in NTDDK.H).
> > As for any MS EFLAGS_xx definitions, I'm not privvy and can't say.
>
> Then shut up and don't post completely USELESS and wrong information.