Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 14047: Dispatching & Queue Rewrite II:

[Wesley Parish]

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:53, Richard Campbell wrote:
>   I'm not sure, but i believe he is referring to the
> 'checked build'
>  versions of windows nt...that is, versions of NT that included debugging
>  symbols. 
That's the way "Inside Windows NT" uses "checked build".
>  
>  Hartmut Birr wrote:
> >  Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> > >  Hartmut Birr wrote:
> > > >  Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> > > > >This introduces hacks into KeWaitXxx (remember != WrQueue?? :P) and
> > > > >also, if you look inside a checked build of NT, you will find
> > > > >ASSERT(Header->Type != QueueObject) inside KeWaitXxx so that really
> > > > >made me unshare the code :)
> > > >
> > > > Can you explain this a little bit more? 
> > > In order to share the code, Gunnar had to insert a hack into the wait
> > > code not to do some things if the wait mode is WrQueue. By using a
> > > dedicated function, the hack can be removed. 
> > Currently I'm not content with this     answer , I expect more an answer
> > to 'if you look inside a checked build of NT'.
> >
> > - Hartmut
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
-- 
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.