Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 14047: Dispatching & Queue Rewrite II:

[Wesley Parish]

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:53, Richard Campbell wrote:
> I'm not sure, but i believe he is referring to the 'checked build'
> versions of windows nt...that is, versions of NT that included debugging
> symbols.

That's the way "Inside Windows NT" uses "checked build".
> Hartmut Birr wrote:
> > Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> > > Hartmut Birr wrote:
> > > > Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> > > > > This introduces hacks into KeWaitXxx (remember != WrQueue?? :P) and
> > > > > also, if you look inside a checked build of NT, you will find
> > > > > ASSERT(Header->Type != QueueObject) inside KeWaitXxx so that really
> > > > > made me unshare the code :)
> > > >
> > > > Can you explain this a little bit more?
> > >
> > > In order to share the code, Gunnar had to insert a hack into the wait
> > > code not to do some things if the wait mode is WrQueue. By using a
> > > dedicated function, the hack can be removed.
> >
> > Currently I'm not content with this     answer , I expect more an answer
> > to 'if you look inside a checked build of NT'.
> > Hartmut
> >
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- 
Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish
-----
Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui?
You ask, what is the most important thing?
Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata.
I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.