Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder

[Igor Paliychuk]

About ARWINSS adoption: Dunno if Aleksey said some details about it but as i
understand he will be not present during that voting. So as one of the main
arwinss testers i propose the next point. I don't think he meant he wants to
replace current win32 SS in trunk. So the idea is to add arwinss files to
trunk and make dual setup/booting or to add another bootcd/testcd target. So
we could vote for each of this ideas or just vote for merging in general. Or
both ;)
So if i'm missing some info about merging plans tell me please. Otherwise
let's just vote ;)

2011/7/28 Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>

>   It's not about having something to hide, it's
> about having the confidence
>  to
>  speak openly about issues and not be concerned about who's listening in.
>  I've never heard of organizations which undertake meetings in public, it
>  seems ludicrous.
>
>  ReactOS driver signing is an internal issue and unless the IRC server is
>  private it should be dropped from the discussions.
>
>  Ged.
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of dmex
>  Sent: 28 July 2011 15:54
>  To: 'ReactOS Development List'
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
>  Private meetings really inspire confidence in the ReactOS project that it
>  has nothing to hide.
>
>  I myself will be observing the meeting to find out what's happening with
>  driver signing as it may impact a project I participate in.
>
>  If you have something to hide then I too suggest talking all future ReactOS
>  developer meetings private.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of Ged Murphy
>  Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 10:28 PM
>  To: 'ReactOS Development List'
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
>  Really??? I had no idea this was the case.
>  I thought the whole point of having it on private servers was to restrict
>  who or what could read the logs.
>
>  I suggest this be changed to make the meetings private.
>  People should be able to talk freely without the worry of having what they
>  say logged by unknown 3rd parties.
>
>  Ged.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of Colin Finck
>  Sent: 28 July 2011 15:15
>  To: ReactOS Development List
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
>
>   Ged Murphy wrote:
> >   Can I just confirm that the channel is only
> > available to people in the
> >  list and not the general public? 
>   No, it is and has always been open to everybody who likes to join.
>   People without username and password can just act as observers though,  so
>  they cannot talk and vote.
>   This is also why we have voiced and non-voiced people during the  meeting.
>
>
>   - Colin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>