I agree on "beta" being more like 80-90% implementation coverage, however
given the 80/20 rule applied to development, that says that < 20% of the
bugs cause >80% of the bug reports (I'd guess this will be 5% of the bugs
causing 95% of the reports, if not even more), so one could argue that
having a codebase 80% complete, is still only 50% of the work, because the
other 50% will be a whole lot of polishing.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 18:03, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The link between 0.5 and beta was an old statement we
used to have on our
website, I’m not sure why that relationship existed other than a splitting
an integer in half and assigning 0.5 to each stage.
I’m more of the opinion that beta products are close to release, so 0.8+
would be more suitable.
Anyway, it’s a conversation to be had internally.
Ged.
*From:* Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org> *On Behalf Of *
hermes.belusca(a)sfr.fr
*Sent:* Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:51
*To:* ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
*Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
Hi!
Usually when we talk about ReactOS 0.5, we implicitly think that it will
enter beta state there.
So unless you consider this to not completely hold anymore, we can look at
what remains to be done/fixed (importantly) so that we may qualify as going
into beta state.
(And yes, USB and storage sound strongly as prerequisites for 0.5 in my
opinion).
Best,
Hermes
De : "Ged Murphy"
A : "'ReactOS Development List'"
Envoyé: mercredi 28 novembre 2018 17:42
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
Some potential talking points:
- Selecting a new coordinator
- Version bump to 0.5
- USB / Storage (perhaps linked to a 0.5 release)
- Mattermost
- New website progress
*From:* Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org> *On Behalf Of *Mark Jansen
*Sent:* Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:13
*To:* ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
*Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
We can discuss this if you are present, but I don't see the value in
discussing it without you.
We have seen before that something discussed without the initiator being
present is time not well spent, since it is a bit hard to argue with only
one side of the argument present
Op 26 nov. 2018 12:15 schreef hermes.belusca(a)sfr.fr:
Hello,
I may not be available as it's the day when I'm going somewhere for a
conference; it just depends at which time I arrive at destination.
For the meeting we may talk about the best way we can move to delivering
all-in-one ReactOS ISOs (containing livecd + installation in both text and
GUI modes), and which changes this could imply for our infrastructure
(buildbots/website...).
Best regards,
Hermes
De : "Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo"
A : "ReactOS Development List"
Envoyé: samedi 24 novembre 2018 22:06
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
I'm at work but I will do my best to attend!
El sáb., 24 nov. 2018 21:38, Colin Finck <colin(a)reactos.org> escribió:
Hi all!
Let me invite you to the November 2018 meeting, taking place next
Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 19:00 UTC.
Invited members will again receive their credentials shortly before the
meeting.
This will be the first meeting since August and I hope we get some more
topics than just the obligatory Status Reports. Please send your
proposals by replying to this mail.
Best regards,
Colin
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev