Probably will be in the future. Only reason it wasn't was because I was not aware of the concern, the component wasn't listed on any of the packaging pages as should be included, and none of the testers pointed out a desire for it. One of the devs says he suggested this a while ago, but I had no awareness of the suggestion.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Adam Kachwalla geekdundee@gmail.comwrote:
Shouldn't matter too much... we stick rosapps and rostests in there as optional components, I'm sure Wine Gecko shouldn't be too much of a problem to insert this way.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:24:28 +1100, Olaf Siejka caemyr@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, why dont we add another 5-10 minutes to ros compile time....
As for integration i just placed wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab in trunk\modules\optional\
Regards
2010/10/27 Adam Kachwalla geekdundee@gmail.com
What about Wine Gecko from source? Also, I would think that because it is a GPL module, it wouldn't matter if the binaries are there or not?
http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildingWineGecko
By the way, did you have to extract the cab file into the modules/optional folder, or how did you integrate it?
-- Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime. Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev