27 Oct
2010
27 Oct
'10
4:06 p.m.
Probably will be in the future. Only reason it wasn't was because I was not
aware of the concern, the component wasn't listed on any of the packaging
pages as should be included, and none of the testers pointed out a desire
for it. One of the devs says he suggested this a while ago, but I had no
awareness of the suggestion.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Shouldn't matter too much... we stick rosapps and
rostests in there as
optional components, I'm sure Wine Gecko shouldn't be too much of a problem
to insert this way.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:24:28 +1100, Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Sure, why dont we add another 5-10 minutes to ros compile time....
As for integration i just placed wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab in
trunk\modules\optional\
Regards
2010/10/27 Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee(a)gmail.com>
What about Wine Gecko from source? Also, I would
think that because it
is a GPL module, it wouldn't matter if the binaries are there or not?
http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildingWineGecko
By the way, did you have to extract the cab file into the modules/optional
folder, or how did you integrate it?
--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev