Re: [ros-dev] Wine Gecko

[Zachary Gorden]

Probably will be in the future.  Only reason it wasn't was because I was not
aware of the concern, the component wasn't listed on any of the packaging
pages as should be included, and none of the testers pointed out a desire
for it.  One of the devs says he suggested this a while ago, but I had no
awareness of the suggestion.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

>    Shouldn't matter too much... we stick rosapps and
> rostests in there as
>  optional components, I'm sure Wine Gecko shouldn't be too much of a problem
>  to insert this way.
>
>    On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:24:28 +1100, Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>
>   Sure, why dont we add another 5-10 minutes to ros compile time....
>
>  As for integration i just placed wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab in
>  trunk\modules\optional\
>
>  Regards
>
>  2010/10/27 Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee(a)gmail.com>
>
> >    What about Wine Gecko from source? Also, I would
> > think that because it
> >  is a GPL module, it wouldn't matter if the binaries are there or not?
> >
> >  http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildingWineGecko
> >
> >  By the way, did you have to extract the cab file into the modules/optional
> >  folder, or how did you integrate it?
> >
> >
> >  
>
>   --
>  Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
>  Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
>  Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>