Re: [ros-dev] Assembly

[Betov]

-------Original Message-------
 
From: David Johnson
Date: 18/04/2007 02:10:31
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Assembly
 
>  I am counting on ROS v1.0
>  
>  On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:08 PM, João Jerónimo wrote:
>
>  
> >  Betov wrote:
> > * If ReactOS is a virtually dead Project, because of the topic that all of
> >   You seem to carefully avoid and try to hide under the carpet, we (the
> >   RosAsm Project), will effectively have serious problems, and not only
> >   With its Name. See what I mean Alexey? ("Nothing has been found yet",
> >   "these are rumors", and so on...).
> >  
>  
>  I can be wrong, but I think the solution followed by
> React's developers 
concerning that topic was
The only one (out of the proposed ones) that can avoid ReactOS' death...
>  
>  
>  Really, there seems to be a lot less enthusiasm in this
> ML since all that 
discussion took place, but
This isn't an indicative that "ReactOS is a virtually dead Project"...
 
 
I also would like to see  V.1.0 up and living some other day, David.
If not, I will have wasted ten years of my life for nope.
 
This is exactly the reason why I am questioning about the Audit conduct.
Up to now, I never got any answer (not considering the standard propaganda)
 
My questions are flat and simple:
 
* Do the developers of a GPL Project have anything to hide?
 
* Why are NOT the offending Files listed in the public "Locked List".
 
* If the Files are hidden under the carpet, who will fix them and how?
 
* Can you imagine that, if I can point them out, MicroSoft will miss them,
the day
   ReactOS will become a problem for their income?
 
* What is the mean for these outrageous bullshits saying that nothing has
been found?
 
 
Betov.