The logical layout is exactly what is wrong with the tree. The tree
is currently laid out in a manner which you would expect someone who doesn't
understand NT architecture. Things are laid out by type instead of by
architecture.
It makes building individual areas of the operating system very difficult.
On 25 July 2010 19:03, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
Yes, there is no sense in doing two mainly unrelated
very big tasks
simulteneously. Also my own opinion still hasn't changed - existing layout
is quite logical (there are exceptions, but they are everywhere), and any
modularization could be achieved already with existing tools like sysgen.
Let cmake branch be actual cmake experiment, not an awesome attempt to fix
whole ReactOS at once [image: Улыбка смайлик]
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
*From:* Zachary Gorden <drakekaizer666(a)gmail.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, July 25, 2010 9:45 PM
*To:* ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
*Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch
forcmake bringup.
I also support a reshuffling of the directories, but not in the cmake
branch. Let that be used JUST for getting cmake up and running and if/once
that is merged into trunk, then we look into changing the structure. Best
not to complicate one task by adding more to it.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev