Re: Re: [ros-dev] Moving svn to another contrury or not

[Alex Buell]

On Thu,  2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT) "Johannes Olofsson"
<johannes_olofsson(a)spray.se> waved a wand and this message magically
appeared:

Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses
plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes
html, you know. 

-- 
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Samuel Bronson]

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:25:18 +0000, Alex Buell wrote:

>   On Thu,  2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT)
> "Johannes Olofsson"
>  <johannes_olofsson(a)spray.se> waved a wand and this
>  message magically appeared:
>  
>  Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses
>  plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes html,
>  you know. 
My newsreader (Pan) doesn't even like messages with a choice of HTML or
plain-text.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

[Alex Buell]

On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:44:44 -0500 Samuel Bronson <naesten(a)gmail.com>
waved a wand and this message magically appeared:

>   On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:25:18 +0000, Alex Buell wrote:
>  
> >   On Thu,  2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT)
> > "Johannes Olofsson"
> >  <johannes_olofsson(a)spray.se> waved a wand and this
> >  message magically appeared:
> >  
> >  Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses
> >  plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes html,
> >  you know. 
>  
>  My newsreader (Pan) doesn't even like messages with a choice of HTML or
>  plain-text. 
Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of
space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft
lets you do it doesn't mean it's right.

-- 
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Martin Fuchs]

>   Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because
> it's a waste of
>  space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft
>  lets you do it doesn't mean it's right. 
Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before
posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of
the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing
lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on... 
;-)

Regards

    Martin

[Alex Buell]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:05:28 +0100 Martin Fuchs <fuchs.martin(a)gmail.com>
waved a wand and this message magically appeared:

> >   Sylpheed's
> > pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of
> >  space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft
> >  lets you do it doesn't mean it's right. 
>  
>  Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before
>  posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of
>  the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing
>  lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on... 
>  ;-) 
In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs. 

-- 
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Andrew "Silver Blade" Greenwood]

Alex Buell wrote:
>   In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and
> attack PCs. 
>   
It's not the fault of HTML if Microsoft decide to allow their browsers, 
email clients and indeed operating systems to do funky things with it :p

[Samuel Bronson]

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:32:25 +0000, Andrew "Silver Blade" Greenwood wrote:

>   Alex Buell wrote:
> >   In the past, HTML have been used to insert
> > viruses and attack PCs.
> >    
>  It's not the fault of HTML if Microsoft decide to allow their browsers,
>  email clients and indeed operating systems to do funky things with it :p 
Some of those problems have been caused by buffer overflows in image
loading code, perhaps even in zlib (yes, there have been buffer overflows
in ZLib!). You can't really blame MS for bugs in zlib. Of course
many of the problems had to do with embedded scripts being given too much
freedom, and that you can blame MS for.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

[Jamie White]

I would have to agree with those who don't want the server, what is the
point in moving the server?

On 2/3/06, Alex Buell <alex.buell(a)munted.org.uk> wrote:
>  
>  On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:05:28 +0100 Martin Fuchs <fuchs.martin(a)gmail.com>
>  waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
>
> >   > Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable
> > html because it's a waste of
> >  > space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because 
>  Microsoft
> > >   lets you
> > > do it doesn't mean it's right. 
> >  Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before
> >  posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of
> >  the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing
> >  lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on...
> >  ;-) 
>  In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs.
>
>  --
>  http://www.munted.org.uk
>
>  "Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  


--
Jatos

[art yerkes]

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:33:29 +0000
Jamie White <jatos.software(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>   I would have to agree with those who don't want
> the server, what is the
>  point in moving the server? 
It seems like the original problem was that GvG asked us to find a new
host.  Is that resolved or are we still looking? 

If we're still looking, I think that we should accept JvA's offer.
-- 
Here's a simple experiment. Stand on a train track between two
locomotives which are pushing on you with equal force in opposite
directions. You will exhibit no net motion. None the less, you may
soon begin to notice that something important is happening.
-- Robert Stirniman

[Ge van Geldorp]

>   From: art yerkes
>  
>  It seems like the original problem was that GvG asked us to 
>  find a new host. 
That's no longer an issue.

GvG

[Magnus Olsen]

The reason to move svn is many. and we have talk about moving svn to another place. We
have not yet make a final destions on it yet. 

 revers eng is allown in alot of country 
    diffent is in USA only one way todo revers eng have been tested in court and what is
okay or not. to use other metod in usa is unclear. 

Moving the svn. is not avoid the current problem and the svn are in dermark already. 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Johannes Olofsson 
  To: ReactOS Development List 
  Sent: den 2 February 2006 14:37
  Subject: Re: Re: [ros-dev] Moving svn to another contrury or not


  I don't mind keeping the code in Sweden, but the reason for it seems plain stupid!
What is the point of using code that still can't be used in at least the major part of
the world. According to the discussions lately some people want this project to become
more and more a reverse engineering project. Reverse engineering used to be considered a
last resort, but from the voices heard on this list lately just about anybody wants to
reverse engineer just about anything for just about any reason. 



  Why not focus on how to keep reactos as far away from trouble instead of focusing on how
close we can get to the edge before loosing our foothold.



  If the legality of this project is going to be so much in doubt that you feel that you
have to hide it in a country that happens to be more liberal in this area at the moment
(though I highly doubt that the laws differ as much as you think), then I will consider
all those hours that i have spent for a number of years on following the progress of
ReactOS wasted.



  Regards

  Johannes Olofsson







------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>   Från: Ibrahim Damlaj <idamlaj(a)gmail.com>
>  Till: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
>  Rubrik: Re: [ros-dev] Moving svn to another contrury or not
>  Datum: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:34:09 +0200 


  In sweden, reverse engeneering for compatibility is 100% legal. So, IMO, Reactos could
keep some reverse-engineered code if that code is kept in a place where
reverse-engineering is legal.


  On 2/2/06, Johannes Olofsson <johannes_olofsson(a)spray.se> wrote: 
    Just curious...what would be the reason for moving svn? 
    /Johannes Olofsson


    _______________________________________________
    Ros-dev mailing list
    Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
    http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev




_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/
mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Ros-dev mailing list
  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Thomas Weidenmueller]

Magnus Olsen wrote:
>   The reason to move svn is many. and we have talk about
> moving svn to
>  another place. We have not yet make a final destions on it yet. 
>   revers eng is allown in alot of country 
>      diffent is in USA only one way todo revers eng have been tested in
>  court and what is okay or not. to use other metod in usa is unclear. 
>  Moving the svn. is not avoid the current problem and the svn are in
>  dermark already. 
That doesn't fix anything. Moving the SVN server won't protect the users
of ReactOS in other countries.

- Thomas