On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT) "Johannes Olofsson" johannes_olofsson@spray.se waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes html, you know.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:25:18 +0000, Alex Buell wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT) "Johannes Olofsson" johannes_olofsson@spray.se waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes html, you know.
My newsreader (Pan) doesn't even like messages with a choice of HTML or plain-text.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:44:44 -0500 Samuel Bronson naesten@gmail.com waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:25:18 +0000, Alex Buell wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:37:24 +0000 (GMT) "Johannes Olofsson" johannes_olofsson@spray.se waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Your message was full of html tags. Can you make sure your mailer uses plain text instead of html. Some of us don't use clients that likes html, you know.
My newsreader (Pan) doesn't even like messages with a choice of HTML or plain-text.
Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft lets you do it doesn't mean it's right.
Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft lets you do it doesn't mean it's right.
Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on... ;-)
Regards
Martin
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:05:28 +0100 Martin Fuchs fuchs.martin@gmail.com waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because Microsoft lets you do it doesn't mean it's right.
Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on... ;-)
In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs.
Alex Buell wrote:
In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs.
It's not the fault of HTML if Microsoft decide to allow their browsers, email clients and indeed operating systems to do funky things with it :p
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:32:25 +0000, Andrew "Silver Blade" Greenwood wrote:
Alex Buell wrote:
In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs.
It's not the fault of HTML if Microsoft decide to allow their browsers, email clients and indeed operating systems to do funky things with it :p
Some of those problems have been caused by buffer overflows in image loading code, perhaps even in zlib (yes, there have been buffer overflows in ZLib!). You can't really blame MS for bugs in zlib. Of course many of the problems had to do with embedded scripts being given too much freedom, and that you can blame MS for.
I would have to agree with those who don't want the server, what is the point in moving the server?
On 2/3/06, Alex Buell alex.buell@munted.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:05:28 +0100 Martin Fuchs fuchs.martin@gmail.com waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Sylpheed's pretty good, but I disable html because it's a waste of space and is against all RFC internet standards. Just because
Microsoft
lets you do it doesn't mean it's right.
Please carefully re-read RFC2822, RFC2045, RFC2046 and RFC2049 before posting such predications. MIME encapsulated HTML mails are part of the standard. However that doesn't mean one should use them on mailing lists. They are quite handy for birthday greeting cards and so on... ;-)
In the past, HTML have been used to insert viruses and attack PCs.
"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- Jatos
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:33:29 +0000 Jamie White jatos.software@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to agree with those who don't want the server, what is the point in moving the server?
It seems like the original problem was that GvG asked us to find a new host. Is that resolved or are we still looking?
If we're still looking, I think that we should accept JvA's offer.
The reason to move svn is many. and we have talk about moving svn to another place. We have not yet make a final destions on it yet.
revers eng is allown in alot of country diffent is in USA only one way todo revers eng have been tested in court and what is okay or not. to use other metod in usa is unclear.
Moving the svn. is not avoid the current problem and the svn are in dermark already.
----- Original Message ----- From: Johannes Olofsson To: ReactOS Development List Sent: den 2 February 2006 14:37 Subject: Re: Re: [ros-dev] Moving svn to another contrury or not
I don't mind keeping the code in Sweden, but the reason for it seems plain stupid! What is the point of using code that still can't be used in at least the major part of the world. According to the discussions lately some people want this project to become more and more a reverse engineering project. Reverse engineering used to be considered a last resort, but from the voices heard on this list lately just about anybody wants to reverse engineer just about anything for just about any reason.
Why not focus on how to keep reactos as far away from trouble instead of focusing on how close we can get to the edge before loosing our foothold.
If the legality of this project is going to be so much in doubt that you feel that you have to hide it in a country that happens to be more liberal in this area at the moment (though I highly doubt that the laws differ as much as you think), then I will consider all those hours that i have spent for a number of years on following the progress of ReactOS wasted.
Regards
Johannes Olofsson
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Från: Ibrahim Damlaj idamlaj@gmail.com Till: ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Rubrik: Re: [ros-dev] Moving svn to another contrury or not Datum: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:34:09 +0200
In sweden, reverse engeneering for compatibility is 100% legal. So, IMO, Reactos could keep some reverse-engineered code if that code is kept in a place where reverse-engineering is legal.
On 2/2/06, Johannes Olofsson johannes_olofsson@spray.se wrote: Just curious...what would be the reason for moving svn? /Johannes Olofsson
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/ mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Magnus Olsen wrote:
The reason to move svn is many. and we have talk about moving svn to another place. We have not yet make a final destions on it yet. revers eng is allown in alot of country diffent is in USA only one way todo revers eng have been tested in court and what is okay or not. to use other metod in usa is unclear. Moving the svn. is not avoid the current problem and the svn are in dermark already.
That doesn't fix anything. Moving the SVN server won't protect the users of ReactOS in other countries.
- Thomas
-
Alex Buell -
Andrew "Silver Blade" Greenwood -
art yerkes -
Ge van Geldorp -
Jamie White -
Johannes Olofsson -
Magnus Olsen -
Martin Fuchs -
Samuel Bronson -
Thomas Weidenmueller