Ros-dev May 2005

ros-dev@reactos.org

68 participants
173 discussions

by Robert Köpferl

Hi, we're stright aproaching a new release. Or at first: A branch. What about the version number? As far as I followed the discussions, 0.3 is still away :-( . And how about our new build system. Is it successfully running? I for my part would feel more comfortable if the next intermediate-release would still use the old build system.

19 years, 3 months

svn.reactos.com maintenance

by Casper Hornstrup

Hi. Within the next 3 hours, I'll be taking the svn.reactos.com box down for maintenance. I expect it to take less than 30 minutes. Casper

19 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] RE: [greatlrd] 15646: Remove two file that are not need anylonger

by Sylvain Petreolle

`Remove two file that are not need any longer fix some compilings warings' <== --- Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.com> a écrit: > > From: greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com > > > > Updated files: > > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabextract.c > > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabinet_main.c > > What's the purpose of the changes you made to these two files? > > Gé van Geldorp. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

19 years, 3 months

RE: [greatlrd] 15646: Remove two file that are not need anylonger

by Ge van Geldorp

> From: greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabextract.c > trunk/reactos/lib/cabinet/cabinet_main.c What's the purpose of the changes you made to these two files? Gé van Geldorp.

19 years, 3 months

RBuild woes...

by Alex Ionescu

Hi, Here is my beef with rbuild. I can't fix most of these as I don't have the skills/knowledge of rbuild. 1) Project link flags are applied at the end of the command line...this makes -Wl optimization flags not work. 2) DBG = 0 and GCC 4 creates a load of new warnings that weren't there before. For example, I can't build ntoskrnl anymore. This is because it's detecting "uninitialized variables" which are actually being initalized by the macros themselves (see mm/pe.c and elf.inc.h). This did not happen before rbuild. 3) Strip isn't being executed for dbg = 0 anymore... I can add it but I have no idea how to make it dbg = 0 only. Not sure: 4) Is the OPTIMIZED envirovar still taken into account? I didn't seem to see so. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

19 years, 3 months

New build system ready for trunk

by Casper Hornstrup

Hi. I believe the new build system is ready to replace the current build system in trunk. Unless there are objections, I plan on merging the branch to trunk in the weekend of 27 - 29 of may. I'd like to take the opportunity to thank everyone that helped make this possible - especially Royce Mitchell III, Ge van Geldorp, and Steven Edwards. It would be nice if you could checkout the branch and check that the features you can't live without are still there so we can have them ready before the merge. If you have major new feature requests that are not essential, I'd like to put them on hold until after the merge. To checkout the branch do a: svn co svn://svn.reactos.com/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos For a list of environment variables that controls the build see: http://svn.reactos.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos/M… For more technical information see: http://svn.reactos.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/branches/xmlbuildsystem/reactos/t… This is not a 100% solution to our dependency problems though. There can still be corner-cases where it is needed to manually clean some files, but it will be needed a lot less than today. Also in order to have acceptable performance, we cannot check dependencies on every included file on each make invocation. Therefore, this is currently only checked each time the automatically generated makefile (makefile.auto) is regenerated. Makefile.auto is regenerated each time a build system file (*.xml) is modified. If you need to check the dependencies on files not specified in the build system files "automatic dependencies", then delete makefile.auto and run make again. Casper

19 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 15570: Use W32API.

by Alex Ionescu

navaraf(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Use W32API. > > >Updated files: >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/Makefile >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/dump.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/jitter.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/openclos.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/packet.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/packet.h >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/read.c >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/win_bpf.h >trunk/reactos/drivers/net/npf/write.c > >_______________________________________________ >Ros-svn mailing list >Ros-svn(a)reactos.com >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > > This breaks the dbg=0 build because of the ASSERT macro in winddk.h. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

19 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 15574: Bye, bye "include/net/" directory...

by Alex Ionescu

navaraf(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Bye, bye "include/net/" directory... > > >Deleted files: >trunk/reactos/include/net/ > >_______________________________________________ >Ros-svn mailing list >Ros-svn(a)reactos.com >http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > > This breaks the build because lib/packet can't find the net include files anymore. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

19 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-svn] [greatlrd] 15482: VBE driver never write which reslutions it should use as defualt

by Gge

greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > VBE driver never write which reslutions it should use as defualt > therefor the change resultions did not working on bootcd > do not remove this settings. from the reg. > Thanks > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/bootdata/hivesys.inf > This is already possible in the "hiveinst.file" It should be only in one place Regards Gge

19 years, 3 months

Re: [ros-dev] All months again: New Release

by Steven Edwards

--- Robert K�pferl <rob(a)koepferl.de> wrote: > we're stright aproaching a new release. > Or at first: A branch. > What about the version number? As far as I followed the discussions, 0.3 > is still away :-( . > > And how about our new build system. Is it successfully running? > I for my part would feel more comfortable if the next > intermediate-release would still use the old build system. I would rather wait till Casper merges rbuild and we get it stable then tag a release. There is no point in stablising the tree to just break it again in another week or two. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

19 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev May 2005