Hi,
have problems to compile revison 15501. See below:
D:\home\willaxt\Entwicklung\ROS\src\reactos>make
crt: [DEPENDS] wine/.cppexcept.d
crt: [DEPENDS] wine/.cpp.d
crt: [CC] wine/cpp.c
crt: [CC] wine/cppexcept.c
crt: [AR] ../../dk/w32/lib/libcrt.a
freeldr: Tools are up to date.
freeldr: Tools are up to date.
===================================================== Assembling fat
===================================================== Assembling fat32
freeldr: Compiling mm/mm
freeldr: Compiling freeldr
freeldr: LINKING freeldr.sys
freeldr: LINKING setupldr.sys
freeldr: Make ALL done.
ntoskrnl: [DEPENDS] ob/.object.d
ntoskrnl: [CC] kd/kdinit.c
kd/kdinit.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
kd/kdinit.c:25: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
kd/kdinit.c:26: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
make[1]: *** [kd/kdinit.o] Error 1
make: *** [ntoskrnl] Error 2
D:\home\willaxt\Entwicklung\ROS\src\reactos>gcc -v
Reading specs from
D:/home/willaxt/Entwicklung/ROS/tool/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc-lib
/mingw32/3.3.1/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
--host=
mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw --enable-threads --disable-nls
--enable
-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada,java --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared
--e
nable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-libgcj --disable-java-awt --without-x
--enable-ja
va-gc=boehm --disable-libgcj-debug --enable-interpreter
--enable-hash-synchroniz
ation
Thread model: win32
gcc version 3.3.1 (mingw special 20030804-1)
Did a complete new check out before. Could this be a compiler problem. Am I
using the right gcc version.
Thanks for help,
Theo
-------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Theodor Willax, Moosburg
http://www.willax-online.de
-------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
So einfach geht das. MSN Toolbar mit Pop-up-Blocker. http://toolbar.msn.de/
Jetzt kostenlos downloaden und gut ist!
Hi,
Dynamic IP is not working actually for some unknown reason in my Ros
real hardware as dhcp DISCSCOVERmessage sent to dhcp server (my router)
by dhcp client has no reply ( noDHCPOFFER received in Ros)
This configuration is working fine in window but it is broken in my box
( don't know why it is broken but this happened already once ) .
As a alternative solution I setup Hivesys.inf for static IP and I got
the same dialog problem between dhpcp client and dhcp server .
=> the dhpc client service should not sent a DHCPDISCOVER message to the
dhcp
server if the IP address is static in Hivesys.inf ( so different of
"0.0.0.0")
=> The Ip address setup in Hivesys.ing must be taken into account in
that case.
I have created the Bug 639 for this issue
The test has been done with svn 15447
Regards
Gge
ion(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>Nonpaged Pool Liberation Day: Allow PagedPool to be used earlier, allow fast mutex to be used earlier on debug builds. Allocate all Se stuff from PagedPool, set the right object types to use paged pool, allocate all strings from paged pool, allocate PE sections from paged pool, and a bunch of other things which should, imo, be in paged pool. If anyone has any contradicting proof, let me know...until then, enjoy ~4-6MB more NonPagedPool
>
>
>
>
Hi,
I don't like the exchange from NonPagedPool to PagePool at the current
state of ros. There are two reasons:
A) The allocation of paged pool is very slowly compared with the non
paged pool allocation.
B) Since the change to the new object type structures, ros has a big
memory leakage in the memory (pool) allocation/deallocation of objects.
For the non paged pool, there exist some debug functions to find the
problem. The paged pool doesn't implement anything to find such problems.
- Hartmut
Hi Jason,
--- Jason Filby <jason.filby(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Vizzini has officially stepped down from the kernel coordinator
> position. It's a pity that legalities and the nature of his business
> have put him in this position. I've expressed our thanks for his input
> and contributions to the project to Vizzini.
Thats sad to hear. We hope to see you again soon Vizzini.
> The kernel coordinator position will be up for vote for nominiated
> candidates. This will only happen after the UI team has settled.
Can we go ahead and start the nomination process and discussion now? There are a few people
that would be nice to see in this role, Filip, Hartmut, Alex, James, Hpoussin, Art, did I forget
anyone else? I would like to hear from each of them on if they would even want the job?
I am leaning towards Alex currently for my nomination because he has the most time to focus on the
kernel and has shown a lot of initiative though I don't always agree with his development and
research methods so someone else could get my nomination and or vote.
> In case you're wondering, the project coordinator position, which I've
> been sitting on for around 7/8 years now, will also be up for vote in
> the near future. This will only happen once we've nailed down a
> constitution for the project (and no, I'm not leaving the project,
> just opening things up).
Well lets get moving. Not that I want to see you gone or anything =) but your
we do need to move forward with this and I need to get some real business plans
together for the foundation stuff. BTW I am taking vacation for the next few days
from my day job and one of the things on my TODO list is to talk to the Legal people
about the trademark stuff again.
Thanks
Steven
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
mbosma(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>PackageManager
>
>
>Updated files:
>trunk/rosapps/packmgr/lib/options.cpp
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
It would be nice if your commit messages had more...substance to them. =)
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
Hi,
--- Jakob Eriksson <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> This is a known trouble with Windows programs too.
> There is icmp.dll, check out: http://www.sockets.com/ms_icmp.htm
This dll is depreacated though we have a copy of the implementation from Wine in our tree if
anyone wants to look at it.
Thanks
Steven
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
>Implement sub-allocation of small requests
>
>
>
>Updated files:
>trunk/reactos/boot/freeldr/freeldr/freeldr.c
>trunk/reactos/boot/freeldr/freeldr/mm/mm.c
>
>_
>
Ge,
After our changes I can now boot a network-ready (with DHCP + FTP
working) console-mode ROS with only 14MB of physical memory. I suspect
that after the OB leak is fixed this number will go down. My goal is 12MB.
There are also dozens of bugs in the paging code which someone has to fix.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu