Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5788 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Regarding Tsonic OS (2)

by David Eckert

whoops, -fairview, i meant the FBI lol :P -- -David W. Eckert

16 years, 6 months

Regarding Tsonic OS

by David Eckert

With regards to Tsonic OS, It would be very advisable at this point to get all DNS information and ISP information and report this individual(s) to either their ISP or Fairview, or perhaps both. -- -David W. Eckert

16 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] Hello , we are searching for people with programing skills for the operating system Tsonic OS.

by Mark Tempel

Two things: 1) Please take me off your list. I know that you pulled my email address from the reactos mailing list. Since your project is not reactos, I'm not interested in hearing about it. 2) Posting links to leaked Microsoft source code in any forum related to reactos shows a complete lack of good judgment, and a lack of knowledge of recent reactos history. I certainly hope that you don't intend to try to check a derivative of leaked Windows source into the reactos tree. That would taint reactos and make it vulnerable to legal action (at least here in the US). Further, since you are acting as a spokesperson for TonicOs, and are passing around links to stolen Microsoft intellectual property, I would consider TonicOs already tainted. Please take conversations about leaked Windows source to some other venue. --mark On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:44:18 -0800 "Tsvetan Banchev" <tsvetanmail(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://[cut]/Windows_2000_source_code > http://[cut]/Windows_XP_Source_Code > obtained from a friend inside ms ;) > > rar password needs cracking, working on it now. could >take a few days. if > anyone's got a high end machine it'd be appreciated if >they could use a RAR > password recovery app to get it.

16 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 32667: - Fix build.

by Steven Edwards

Hi, On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:07 PM, <fireball(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote: > Author: fireball > Date: Wed Mar 12 14:07:32 2008 > New Revision: 32667 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=3D32667&view=3Drev > Log: > - Fix build. > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ntoskrnl-generic.rbuild > > Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ntoskrnl-generic.rbuild > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ntoskrnl-gen= > eric.rbuild?rev=3D32667&r1=3D32666&r2=3D32667&view=3Ddiff > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D Diffs have been broken since the recent email problems. Is there any estimate on when/if this is going to be fixed? Thanks -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

16 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [greatlrd] 32652: part 2/2 for implement GetAppCompatFlags left todo implemented set AppCompatFlags

by Aleksey Bragin

Why did that big chunk of MS's support database text got into our codebase? Even not edited, so that I can read up about "tax form 1040 would not print correctly" in ReactOS Source code? What is the use from it? If you wanted SO MUCH, you could at least edit it, or ask someone to edit it for you (we have quite a few people in our team). But then, I could insert half of WDK docs into the kernel source code and drivers source code (which in fact would violate copyrights, since it would not even be fair use). Providing URL is quite enough, though, if I don't mistake (I'm not up to date with their position), Wine is already removing URLs from source code because they should be kept somewhere else. Source code is source code, not a collector to store everything. There is no point in sticking various garbage into reactos source code with a note "so it doesn't get lost", we've come over that point quite a few years ago. With the best regards, Aleksey Bragin. On Mar 11, 2008, at 3:09 AM, greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: greatlrd > Date: Mon Mar 10 19:09:23 2008 > New Revision: 32652 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=3D32652&view=3Drev > Log: > part 2/2 for implement GetAppCompatFlags > left todo implemented set AppCompatFlags = > > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/user32/misc/stubs.c > > + /* NOTE : GetAppCompatFlags retuns which compatible flags should > be send= > back = > > + * the return value is any of http://support.microsoft.com/kb/82860 > + * This text are direcly copy from the MSDN URL, so it does not > get lost > + > *--------------------------------------------------------------------- > -= > -------- > + * Bit: 1 Lots of text here > + = > > + return ti->dwAppsCompatibleFlags; > } > = > > /*

16 years, 6 months

Small suggestion

by Heis Spiter

Hi, after r32615 and r32623, I send you this mail in order to find some volunteers to remove all remaining $id from files and also to update FSF address in files hearders. Thanks in advance to the volunteers. Best regards, P. Schweitzer

16 years, 6 months

WDF support

by Andy Grover

Hiya, I have a GPLed driver using the WDF. I'm not clear on the legal status of redistributing GPLed source compiled with the Windows DDK so I'd like to try MinGW. After Googling, I see a couple of mentions back in 2004 that "WDF will have to be supported eventually" but nothing since then? Am I correct in assuming if I want to use MinGW, WDF cannot be used? Thanks -- Andy

16 years, 6 months

All servers down

by Aleksey Bragin

Hello, today all servers (web, svn, mailing lists, etc) will most probably be unavailable for an undetermined amount of time, due to IP addresses change by the hosting company. They beg their pardon for the unconvinience. With the best regards, Aleksey Bragin.

16 years, 7 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 32521: - Fix leaking an entry in some cases during ObpFreeCapturedAttributes call. For more details: http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5311.

by Alex Ionescu

IopFreeIoCompletionPacket has the opposite bug -- there is an interlocked push (free) even in the ExFreePool case. There should be a return following the ExFreePool, otherwise we're corrupting memory. On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, <fireball(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote: > Author: fireball > Date: Thu Feb 28 14:37:14 2008 > New Revision: 32521 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=32521&view=rev > Log: > - Fix leaking an entry in some cases during ObpFreeCapturedAttributes call. For more details: http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5311. > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob_x.h > > Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob_x.h > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/… > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob_x.h (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob_x.h Thu Feb 28 14:37:14 2008 > @@ -290,6 +290,12 @@ > List->L.FreeMisses++; > List->L.Free(Buffer); > } > + else > + { > + /* The free was within the Depth */ > + InterlockedPushEntrySList(&List->L.ListHead, > + (PSINGLE_LIST_ENTRY)Buffer); > + } > } > else > { > > > -- Best regards, Alex Ionescu

16 years, 7 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [mpiulachs] 32449: Add support for multiple architectures to autorun.inf

by Steven Edwards

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:14 AM, <mpiulachs(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote: > Author: mpiulachs > Date: Fri Feb 22 15:14:08 2008 > New Revision: 32449 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=32449&view=rev > Log: > Add support for multiple architectures to autorun.inf > > Modified: > branches/rbuild/reactos/boot/bootdata/autorun.inf > > Modified: branches/rbuild/reactos/boot/bootdata/autorun.inf > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/branches/rbuild/reactos/boot/bootdata/au… > ============================================================================== > --- branches/rbuild/reactos/boot/bootdata/autorun.inf (original) > +++ branches/rbuild/reactos/boot/bootdata/autorun.inf Fri Feb 22 15:14:08 2008 > +[autorun.mips] > + > +open=mips\welcome.exe > +icon=icon.ico > + > +[autorun.alpha] > + > +open=alpha\welcome.exe > +icon=icon.ico This is really unneeded. Alpha is one nail away from the coffin being closed and nobody is even remotely interested in doing a mips port right now. Please remove them and add a an arm entry. Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

16 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev