Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5789 discussions

Re: [ros-diffs] [greatlrd] 22062: replace djgpp hell bugs fcvtbuf with project http://www.jbox.dk/sanos/source/lib/fcvt.c.html with small modification's to match ReactOS arch. Floating point to string conversion routines Copyright (C) 2002 Michael Ringgaard. All rights reserved. Make wine test for fcvt shut up we are failing 64 of wine test in msvrt printf, but we pass all fcvt test. before we did fail 75 test in wine test of msvrt printf test. Before we did fail almost all test case for fcvt in w

by Alex Ionescu

greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: greatlrd > Date: Fri May 26 23:23:34 2006 > New Revision: 22062 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.ru/svn/reactos?rev=22062&view=rev > Log: > replace djgpp hell bugs fcvtbuf with project http://www.jbox.dk/sanos/source/lib/fcvt.c.html with small modification's to match ReactOS arch. Floating point to string conversion routines Copyright (C) 2002 Michael Ringgaard. All rights reserved. > > Make wine test for fcvt shut up we are failing 64 of wine test in msvrt printf, but we pass all fcvt test. before we did fail 75 test in wine test of msvrt printf test. Before we did fail almost all test case for fcvt in wine test > I've been actually importing a LOT of the SanOS code into rtl back when I was working on fixing many of the broken inlined GAS routines, and his code REALLY kicks ass. I strongly recommend using the SanOS CRT functions when possible. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

19 years, 1 month

RE: [ros-dev] RE: [ros-diffs] [amunger] 22052: Bump trunk to 0.4. 0, no turning back now.

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote: > > > amunger(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > > > > URL: http://svn.reactos.ru/svn/reactos?rev=22052&view=rev > > Log: > > Bump trunk to 0.4.0, no turning back now. > > > > Ehh??? Oh I see, nevermind. I read it wrong initially. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

19 years, 1 month

RE: [ros-diffs] [amunger] 22052: Bump trunk to 0.4.0, no turning back now.

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

amunger(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > > URL: http://svn.reactos.ru/svn/reactos?rev=22052&view=rev > Log: > Bump trunk to 0.4.0, no turning back now. > Ehh??? ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

19 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 1172] VIA Rhine II net driver doesn't detect miniport

by James Tabor

Hi! ReactOS.Bugzilla(a)reactos.org wrote: > http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1172 > > > hpoussin(a)reactos.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC|hpoussin(a)reactos.org | > Summary|Network driver will not |VIA Rhine II net driver > |install. |doesn't detect miniport > > > > > ------- Comment #9 from hpoussin(a)reactos.org 2006-05-23 22:18 CET ------- > Changing title, as it is no more a installation problem. > (btw, the wrong name in ncpa control panel is due to a missing entry in > [Strings] section) > > Funny, it once worked. [MANUF] %PCI\VEN_1106&VT3065.DeviceDesc% = VT3065_ndi,PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3065 ;%PCI\VEN_1106&VT3065.DeviceDesc% = VT3065_ndi,PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3065&SUBSYS_734C1462 <snip > Manuf = "VIA Technologies, Inc." VT3106S.DeviceDesc = "VIA Rhine III Management Adapter" VT3106J.DeviceDesc = "VIA Rhine III Fast Ethernet Adapter" VT3065.DeviceDesc = "VIA Rhine II Fast Ethernet Adapter" VT3043.DeviceDesc = "VIA VT86C100A Rhine Fast Ethernet Adapter" FET.Service.DispName = "VIA Rhine Family Fast Ethernet Adapter Driver Service"

19 years, 1 month

Re: Radio buttons...

by David Eckert

Not that I am aware of... but I could be wrong too because I never hang around the bugzilla site lol >> Can someone actually fix the radio buttons? It's getting annoying to >> see it with no outlining on it, not sure why whoever wrote the code >> for it left the outline of it out... >> >Hi, >Is there a bug report for it already? I think we never finished it. >Thanks, >James -- -David W. Eckert

19 years, 1 month

Secure Programming

by M Bealby

Hey all, Well, since time has been very restricted for me I have not done as much code auditing as I would have liked. However, I did add a page to the wiki about writing secure code (Secure_Programming). I hope people find it useful and will add ReactOS specific items to it. I decided to use another page rather than add to Programming_Guidelines as it could grow quite big on its own. It is not linked from any other pages as I didn't want to tread on anyones toes or get in the way of someone else. Hope this helps people write a bit more securely :) Martin

19 years, 1 month

Radio buttons...

by David Eckert

Can someone actually fix the radio buttons? It's getting annoying to see it with no outlining on it, not sure why whoever wrote the code for it left the outline of it out... -- -David W. Eckert

19 years, 1 month

Re: The new look of ReactOS 21942

by mf

WaxDragon wrote: > I have the UIC's approval. I never approved it to be non-user-selectable in the first place. IRC log (18 Apr 2006): 22:27 -!- Irssi: Starting query in FreeNode with Christoph_vW 22:27 <Christoph_vW> http://www.ApiViewer.de/downloads/test.png 22:29 <mf> nice 22:29 <Christoph_vW> ok 22:30 <Christoph_vW> that is what I wanted to hear :-) 22:31 <mf> yeah i saw someone on the forum do that too 22:31 <Christoph_vW> I thought we should differ from windows in some way 22:31 <mf> now make a corner-to-corner gradient :) 22:31 <mf> a-la openstep 22:34 <mf> left-top to right-bottom 22:34 <Christoph_vW> not yet 22:49 <mf> it IS optional though, right? 22:49 <Christoph_vW> no... 22:49 <Christoph_vW> I replaced the old gradient 22:49 <mf> ... 22:50 <mf> please revert it until you can turn it on/off 22:50 <mf> or else there'll be a lot of complaints from devs and useres 22:50 <mf> users* 23:02 <Christoph_vW> http://www.ApiViewer.de/downloads/test2.png 23:05 <mf> slightly better ;) 23:05 <Christoph_vW> good Not that anyone ever listens to what I have to say, though.

19 years, 1 month

Re: The new look of ReactOS 21942

by mf

David Hinz wrote: > What about a vote on this "problem"? There is no vote necessary. The only thing that needs to be done is an interface so people can turn it on/off to their own tastes.

19 years, 1 month

The new look of ReactOS 21942

by theUser BL

Last week I have tested ReactOS build 21942. And I wondern about the ugly changes: - wrong gradient on the top of the windows. - the symbols which say, which icon on the desktop is a link and which not, is now on the right bottom, instead of the left bottom But some icon-designer have the icons so designed, that its ok, if there is something on the left bottom of the icon lost. But the icons are not so designed, that it is lost on any other place. It seems, there are now some ReactOS-developer, who don't like Windows. I would prefering it, if ReactOS looks most as possible like Windows. And if anybody wants to have its own look, that then existing options to change the look of ReactOS. Greatings theuserbl

19 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev