I know I've asked about this before but - maybe I missed something or
I'm stupid - I never got it working.
I'd like to be able to use distcc when compiling ReactOS, if that's at
all possible.
When I tried, rbuild built using it, but then rbuild went on to just
compile locally.
It'd be great if it can be modified to make it a simple flag to pass to
rbuild or the makefile or something.
For working on small parts it's probably not that beneficial, but it'd
make a complete recompile much faster I think :)
jimtabor(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> Add portcls to new branch.
>
>
> Added files:
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/portcls/
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/portcls/portcls.c
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/portcls/portcls.def
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/portcls/portcls.h
> trunk/reactos/drivers/sound/multimedia/portcls/portcls.rc
>
This was KISS! All stubs are based from OSR.
http://www.osronline.com/ddkx/stream/pcdesign_78yv.htm
Thanks,
James
I am told that the sources for FreeLdr are all okay, except for the
some of the bootsectors having been pretty much just disassembled from
MS's. Is this true? If so, will someone please copy them over before I die
of impatiance? Its not like we need those bootsectors, anyway. I mean, a
lot of us on IRC have agreed that using GRUB to load FreeLdr is probably
our best bet for now, until someone gets around to customizing boot code
from GRUB or FreeDOS. Anyway, we don't need to worry about that until the
installation CD boots ;-).
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
In the course of auditing isapnp, I wrote a test case that proves that
switch(a) {
default:
printf("foo\n");
break;
}
While peculiar, cannot be the product of directly reverse engineering
visual C or gcc output (and likely any other compiler).
Is there a place we want to put such apps?
--
Discordant is the murmur at such treading down of lovely things while
god's most lordly gift to man is decency of mind. Call that man only
blest who has in sweet tranquility brought his life to close.
If only I could act as such, my hope is good.
-- Aeschylus' Agamemnon (translated by H. W. Smyth)
Oh... I thought it might have been some kind of expression describing the feeling of "the project is going to #£€% anyway so why not move to Sweden as well..."
My interpretation might have been biased by the somewhat edgy and often childish attitudes displayed in this thread lately. My opinion is that we HAVE to walk a few extra miles to regain the credability of this project. Even if this means more documentation and restrictions for the devoted practicians of reverse engineering.
/Johannes Olofsson
> Från: James Tabor <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net>
> Till: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Rubrik: Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs
> Datum: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:43:42 +0000
> Johannes Olofsson wrote:
> > >
> >
> >>Man! Sweden here we come!
> >>James
> >>
> >
> > ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> > Was this some kind of insult?
> > /Johannes
> >
> WHAT?
> NO! There was talk of moving the svn to Sweden.
> James
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> <a
> href=http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>http://www.reactos.org/
> mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a>