Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5789 discussions

Re: [ros-diffs] [hbirr] 16901: If a mutex already exist, open it instead of create.

by Joseph Galbraith

Are you sure that we should be acquiring the mutex in the open case? MSDN says: bInitialOwner [in] Specifies the initial owner of the mutex object. If this value is TRUE and the caller created the mutex, the calling thread obtains ownership of the mutex object. Otherwise, the calling thread does not obtain ownership of the mutex.... Thanks, Joseph hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > If a mutex already exist, open it instead of create. > Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/kernel32/synch/mutex.c > Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/kernel32/synch/mutex.c > --- trunk/reactos/lib/kernel32/synch/mutex.c 2005-07-30 19:00:33 UTC (rev 16900) > +++ trunk/reactos/lib/kernel32/synch/mutex.c 2005-07-30 19:03:34 UTC (rev 16901) > @@ -92,10 +92,24 @@ > MUTEX_ALL_ACCESS, > &ObjectAttributes, > (BOOLEAN)bInitialOwner); > + if (Status == STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION) > + { > + Status = NtOpenMutant(&MutantHandle, > + MUTEX_ALL_ACCESS, > + &ObjectAttributes); > + if (NT_SUCCESS(Status)) > + { > + if(bInitialOwner) > + { > + WaitForSingleObject(MutantHandle, INFINITE); > + } > + SetLastError(ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS); > + } > + } > if (!NT_SUCCESS(Status)) > { > - SetLastErrorByStatus(Status); > - return NULL; > + SetLastErrorByStatus(Status); > + return NULL; > } > > return MutantHandle;

19 years, 9 months

rbuild: module attributes

by Emanuele Aliberti

Hi all, I think the *module* node needs two more attributes - *subsystem* and *windows* - because at present module type and module subsystem are merged in the *type* attribute and its values are a bit confusing to me; also cui/gui information is hidden into value names. I don't know the rbuild code and I can't therefore say if it is an easy task splitting the logic behind the *type* attribute into tree attributes whitout affecting the whole program logic. A short rationale follows. ___ Valid values for the *type* attribute should be: - library (static) - hal - driver - program - dll Valid values for the *subsystem* attribute should be: - none - native - windows - posix - os2 - vms (default "windows"; "none" required for type "library"; "native" required for types "hal", "driver") Valid values for the *windows* attribute should be: - no - yes (default "no"; "no" required for types "library", "hal", "driver") ___ Examples: *ntdll.dll* <module name="ntdll" type="dll" ...> note that, at present, it is incorrectly described this way <module name="ntdll" type="dll" subsystem="native" ...> *ntoskrnl.exe* <module name="ntoskrnl" type="program" subsystem="native" ...> *atapi.sys* <module name="atapi" type="driver" subsystem="native" ...> -- :Emanuele Aliberti

19 years, 9 months

Reactos.com problems

by Ge van Geldorp

There are pretty strong indications that the reactos.com box was cracked. It took part in a DDoS attack. As a consequence, it was isolated from the network. Unfortunately, I'm on vacation right now so I don't have physical access to the box and am unable to fix/reinstall. For the moment, I've moved the mailing lists to a backup box. I am not moving the website, since it seems the attack was carried out via the website (a vulnerability in one of the php script packages we use). I'll put up a dummy page informing visitors. Not sure how far along the release of 0.2.7 is, but I'd like to suggest to put it off for at least another week, until I'm back and can sort things out. Apologies for the inconvenience, Ge van Geldorp.

19 years, 9 months

[Fwd: Re: [ros-dev] Regression in 15402 - fix in 16860

by Gge

Svn 16860 has fixed this problem (drivers\net\ndis\ndis\io.c:824)(NdisMRegisterInterrupt) Called. InterruptVector (0x9) InterruptLevel (0x9) SharedInterrupt (1) InterruptMode (0x0) (drivers\net\ndis\ndis\io.c:843)(NdisMRegisterInterrupt) Connecting to interrupt vector (0x49) Affinity (0xFFFFFFFF). (drivers\net\ndis\ndis\io.c:848)(NdisMRegisterInterrupt) Leaving. Status (0x0). I'll test again "ping" command with head Regards Gerard

19 years, 9 months

Re: [ros-dev] USB mouse support

by reactos

Hello mr. Wilson and all others who is interested in USB mouse & keyboard. USB mouse and keyboard is being worked on right now, and it will be ready before 0.3.0 and probably after 0.2.7. We are talking weeks not months. Then again, this will be the USB Key and mouse driver, so expect some time for it to mature. Keyboard drivers is probably to be released first because this driver doesn't need HID stack, then the mouse driver will be developed, but there is a need there if some one could find a USB mouse driver C source that doesn't use a HID stack it will be done a lot faster. One interesting detail is that the development will be tested on XBox hardware which will make the XBox-port usable as a development platform. Yours sincerely, Jaix Bly ----Ursprungligt meddelande----- From: Jonathan Wilson jonwil(a)tpgi.com.au Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:21:02 +0200 To: ReactOS Development List ros-dev(a)reactos.com Subject: [ros-dev] USB mouse support > How far away is support for USB mice? > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

19 years, 9 months

RE: [ros-svn] [sedwards] 16887: dos line endings

by Casper Hornstrup

Put svn:eol-style = native on them, then the svn client will take care of it: svn propset -R svn:eol-style "native" dosfsck Casper > -----Original Message----- > From: ros-svn-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:ros-svn-bounces@reactos.com] On Behalf Of > sedwards(a)svn.reactos.com > Sent: 30. juli 2005 01:04 > To: ros-svn(a)reactos.com > Subject: [ros-svn] [sedwards] 16887: dos line endings > > dos line endings > > > Updated files: > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/boot.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/boot.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/byteorder.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/byteswap.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/byteswap1.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/check.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/check.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/common.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/common.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/compiler.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/dosfsck.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/dosfsck.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/fat.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/fat.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/file.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/file.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/getopt.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/io.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/io.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/lfn.c > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/lfn.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/msdos_fs.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/swab.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/version.h > trunk/rosapps/sysutils/dosfsck/vfat.h > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn

19 years, 9 months

Wallpaper and Registry Keys

by James Tabor

Hi all! In Mastering, Win 2K Registry, Sybex books, Pages 282-285. We need some registry fixup to save the wallpaper. HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Control Panel\Desktop, entry Wallpaper, type REG_SZ and value: fully qualified bitmap image filename, entry WallpaperStyle, type REG_SZ and value: 0, entry TileWallpaper, type REG_SZ and value: 0, and on... Same with Mastering, Win XP Registry, Sybex books, Pages 230-231, nothing changed. Is there a problem with implementing some of these? What was the show stopper? Thanks, James

19 years, 9 months

USB mouse support

by Jonathan Wilson

How far away is support for USB mice?

19 years, 9 months

RE: [ros-svn] [gdalsnes] 16793: my 1st

by Murphy, Ged (Bolton)

gdalsnes(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > my 1st > > > Added files: > branches/hardons1stbranch/ > > Updated files: > branches/hardons1stbranch/kapi.h branches/hardons1stbranch/ntuser.h > > Deleted files: > branches/hardons1stbranch/debug.h branches/hardons1stbranch/debug1.h Hi Hardon. Out of interest, what's the purpose of this branch? (probably been discussed in IRC, but I missed it) Thanks, Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

19 years, 9 months

Re: [ros-dev] RE: [ros-svn] [gdalsnes] 16793: my 1st

by ayerkes＠speakeasy.net

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard [mailto:eek2121@comcast.net] > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 12:18 AM > To: 'ReactOS Development List' > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] RE: [ros-svn] [gdalsnes] 16793: my 1st > > Then where is this effort? Why is one developer wandering off on his > own? How about setting a 'win32k rewrite' as a goal for 0.4? That is, > if 0.3 ever makes it out the door... > > Honestly, i think that devs should work towards the feature set we > planned for 0.3, however that is just me. Granted, there is no money > involved in this project, but not setting goals and randomly doing > rewrites is the fast way to code burnout, boredom, and lost interest. > Drowning yourself in an impossibly large project is nuts. > > Richard Not meeting 0.3 is largely my fault. I don't even know when I'll be able to return to writing on it in a consistent way, given my new job :-(. I've had several offers from others to write on it but it seems that most people either aren't very interested in what remains, or don't feel confident about working on kernel code. The remaining kernel tasks don't actually involve much know-how about the kernel, and my components are designed to be easy to understand (with minimal concurrency). Only three things are needed to meet the 0.3 goal: 1) retest apps on the 0.3 list and fix regressions 2) finish the net cpl and possibly fix bugs in npfs that make CallNamedPipe bugcheck 3) (big) finish needed stuff for mozilla compatibility There are a lot of generic tasks in net that need doing, and could really be done by anybody. They affect the kernel but won't use very much specific kernel code: 1) Plumb remaining ioctls into kernel land (afd/info.c,tcpip/*info.c) - Keepalive - Nagle - TTL (datagram and tcp) - Verify behavior of nonblocking sockets - send/rcv buf 2) Plumb ARP cache requests (tcpip/iinfo.c,network/neighbor.c) 3) Put together a test matrix for socket end conditions (when I get my stuff from chicago next saturday, I'll be able to pass on my test apps and notes), and emulate winsock properly. 4) Finish the NTSTATUS -> winsock error conversion and use it everywhere 5) Finish off errno -> NTSTATUS conversion in tcp.c 6) Finish any kernel-related IOCTL changes 7) Write a test tool and verify WSAEnumNetworkEvents 8) Do some refactoring in afd/select.c to make it easier to understand Hard kernely tasks: 1) Fix IRP cancellation in tcpip 2) Verify CLOSE/CLEANUP in afd and tcpip 3) Better buffer management in afd 4) Fix use of TDI_TRANSPORT_ADDRESS vs TA_ADDRESS and verify correctness based on osr docs 5) Test out our AFD and TCPIP on real windows with kd 6) Replace recursive mutex

19 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev