Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5788 discussions

Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution of ROS through XDCC Bot.

by Sylvain Petreolle

If all legal conditions are fulfilled : - give link to the source - (alex's idea) provide md5sum of the file(s) As some people already said, 3d point cant exist. (ros is a LGPL system, some magazines already distribute it, etc.) > [ ] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS through the #ros-xdcc > channel and ROS-XDCC-001 bot. (support and encourage this distribution) > > [X] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS, but it must clearly > distance itself from officially supported releases (tolerate but do not > support this distribution) > > [ ] No, only sourceforge and other official ReactOS distribution points > should be used. Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14017: Added a keep-alive reference to each key object.

by James Tabor

Hi! hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > Added a keep-alive reference to each key object. > Lock the registry while accessing sub keys of a key object. > Implemented a worker thread which removes all unused key objects. > Fixed a bug which shows keys twice if a key is already opened. > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/cm.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/ntfunc.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/registry.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/regobj.c > ntoskrnl: [CC] cm/regobj.c cm/regobj.c: In function `CmiObjectParse': cm/regobj.c:244: error: parse error before '<<' token cm/regobj.c:763: error: parse error at end of input cm/regobj.c:23: warning: `CmiGetLinkTarget' declared `static' but never defined make[1]: *** [cm/regobj.o] Error 1 make: *** [ntoskrnl] Error 2 8^), James

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] [VOTE] Miscelanea branches

by Sylvain Petreolle

--- Casper Hornstrup <ch(a)csh-consult.dk> wrote: > I'd like to close this discussion with a vote. > > Should we allow branches (other than trunk) with mixed new development and bugfixes > unrelated to the new development that is on the branch (miscelanea branches) ? > > [X] Yes, do allow miscelanea branches > > [ ] No, don't allow miscelanea branches > > Casper > Have an svn branch gives a nice way to revert/update and permits others to work with a different POV on the project. Even if only some are using it, it can help ros a lot. (look at the xmlbuildsystem branch that speeds up the compilation a lot) Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

19 years, 6 months

Voting

by Casper Hornstrup

I don't think we've ever formalised our voting procedures. All I seem to remember about this is that committers can vote. I've drafted an initial version here: http://reactos.com/wiki/index.php/Voting Please comment on that. Casper

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-svn] [weiden] 14007: - fixed handle table structures

by James Tabor

Hi! weiden(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > - fixed handle table structures > - implement generic executive handle tables (since there don't exist documents that describe the parameters of most of these functions (which are kernel internal only), i made them up as required) > - adjusted OB's handle manager to use ex handle tables > - adjusted the client id manager to use ex handle tables > > > Added files: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/handle.c > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/config > trunk/reactos/include/ddk/kefuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ntos/obtypes.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/Makefile > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/init.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/sysinfo.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ex.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ps.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/close.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ob/object.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/cid.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/create.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/idle.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/kill.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/thread.c > trunk/reactos/subsys/win32k/misc/object.c > rossym: [CC] initkm.c In file included from ../../include/ntos.h:90, from ../../include/roskrnl.h:2, from initkm.c:11: ../../include/ntos/obtypes.h:122: warning: redefinition of `PHANDLE_TABLE' ../../w32api/include/ddk/ntifs.h:472: warning: `PHANDLE_TABLE' previously declared here make[1]: *** [initkm.o] Error 1 make: *** [rossym] Error 2 Humm 8^/ ???, James

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution of ROS through XDCC Bot.

by Steven Edwards

--- Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > [ ] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS through the #ros-xdcc > channel and ROS-XDCC-001 bot. (support and encourage this distribution) > > [X] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS, but it must clearly > distance itself from officially supported releases (tolerate but do not > support this distribution) Yes but only if they are using a binary published by reactos.org or a core ReactOS developer such as Thomas's nightly builds. If they are not doing so then my vote is no. At the first offence we should warn them and then at the 2nd offence we should deny the use of the ReactOS name > [ ] No, only sourceforge and other official ReactOS distribution points > should be used. We cannot stop distrabution of the OS. Only the use of the name. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-svn] [royce] 14018: -Wall -Werror and fix warnings

by James Tabor

Hi Royce, royce(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > -Wall -Werror and fix warnings > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/Makefile > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/hash.c > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/write_msft.c > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > More crazy Linux port problems, in /reactos/tools/widl, write_msft.c: In function `ctl2_write_chunk': write_msft.c:2189: warning: implicit declaration of function `write' write_msft.c:2190: warning: implicit declaration of function `close' write_msft.c: In function `save_all_changes': write_msft.c:2284: warning: implicit declaration of function `creat' make: *** [write_msft.o] Error 1 It works when removing -Werror -Wall from the Makefile. BTW io.h is in the /usr/mingw32/include directory. Thanks, James

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14000: Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines.

by Thomas Weidenmueller

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines. > > You implementation is better, no doubt, but it wouldn't have mattered to read it twice or more. I mean, it's re-read again down in the InterlockedExchange call, there's a possibility it might have been changed in the meantime as well. But it really wouldn't matter ;) Best Regards, Thomas

19 years, 6 months

Bug #512 - Colinux fails to load

by Gge

Hello, Retransmission of this message sent to Harmut , to Ros-Dev list following error in the mail address of Ros list --------------------------------------------- Harmut , I do not know if this commit is related to the Bug #512 ( Colinux fails to load in MM/MDL ) but more debug messages are displayed now. I have updated Bugzilla with these debug messages. Best regards Gerard Subject: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 13963: Lock the kernel address space instead the process' one, if the pages are located in kernel space. From: <hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:14:38 +0100 To: <ros-svn(a)reactos.com> Lock the kernel address space instead the process' one, if the pages are located in kernel space. Unlock the address space on error.

19 years, 6 months

Re: [ros-dev] State of the WIDL - Part two

by Steven Edwards

Hi, --- Eric Kohl <eric.kohl(a)t-online.de> wrote: > I read the wine-devel list archive a few days ago and relized that > Alexandre rejected the last patch. I want to split the last patch into > more 'atomic' parts tomorrow. Is that OK? Sure thats what I was going to do next. I am going through SVN right now and extracting each atomic commit and manually applying them to my winehq tree. I can send each patch from each atomic commit but its going to take me quite a while to resolve conflicts. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

19 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev