Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5790 discussions

[Fwd: [Fwd: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 13963: Lock the kernel address space - Bug 512 updated]
by Gge 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by MIMEDefang. Following this paragraph are indications of the actual changes made. For more information about your site's MIMEDefang policy, contact MIMEDefang Administrator <mimedefang(a)deos.tudelft.nl>. For more information about MIMEDefang, see: http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/enduser.php3 An attachment of type message/rfc822, named [ros-svn] [hbirr] 13963: Lock the kernel address space instead the process'one, if the pages are located in kernel space. was removed from this document as it constituted a security hazard. If you require this document, please contact the sender and arrange an alternate means of receiving it.

2 4

RE: Re: [ros-dev] [VOTE] Miscelanea branches
by Sylvain Petreolle 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

> Let me make it clear that the vote is about wether or not to allow > a particular type of branch which have some bad consequences. Not > branches in general. See > http://reactos.com:8080/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-March/002083.html > for a description of the common branch types. I did read it (otherwise I wouldnt vote) "Bugs that that could have been fixed on trunk are annoying to trunk developers. The bugfixes that go only to the branch are not in trunk (until merged there from the branch" => trunk developers are free to ask for a merge or use ros-diffs to speed up the merge process. "* Risk of duplicating work. We'll have more branches to track bugfixes on so it's harder to know which bugs has been fixed and which hasn't." you can use ros-svn to track it. And you can fix bugs in bugzilla too. "Fixed in branch my_branch, feel free to merge." > > Do you have commit access? > > Casper Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution of ROS through XDCC Bot.
by Sylvain Petreolle 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

If all legal conditions are fulfilled : - give link to the source - (alex's idea) provide md5sum of the file(s) As some people already said, 3d point cant exist. (ros is a LGPL system, some magazines already distribute it, etc.) > [ ] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS through the #ros-xdcc > channel and ROS-XDCC-001 bot. (support and encourage this distribution) > > [X] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS, but it must clearly > distance itself from officially supported releases (tolerate but do not > support this distribution) > > [ ] No, only sourceforge and other official ReactOS distribution points > should be used. Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

2 1

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14017: Added a keep-alive reference to each key object.
by James Tabor 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

Hi! hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > Added a keep-alive reference to each key object. > Lock the registry while accessing sub keys of a key object. > Implemented a worker thread which removes all unused key objects. > Fixed a bug which shows keys twice if a key is already opened. > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/cm.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/ntfunc.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/registry.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/cm/regobj.c > ntoskrnl: [CC] cm/regobj.c cm/regobj.c: In function `CmiObjectParse': cm/regobj.c:244: error: parse error before '<<' token cm/regobj.c:763: error: parse error at end of input cm/regobj.c:23: warning: `CmiGetLinkTarget' declared `static' but never defined make[1]: *** [cm/regobj.o] Error 1 make: *** [ntoskrnl] Error 2 8^), James

2 3

Re: [ros-dev] [VOTE] Miscelanea branches
by Sylvain Petreolle 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

--- Casper Hornstrup <ch(a)csh-consult.dk> wrote: > I'd like to close this discussion with a vote. > > Should we allow branches (other than trunk) with mixed new development and bugfixes > unrelated to the new development that is on the branch (miscelanea branches) ? > > [X] Yes, do allow miscelanea branches > > [ ] No, don't allow miscelanea branches > > Casper > Have an svn branch gives a nice way to revert/update and permits others to work with a different POV on the project. Even if only some are using it, it can help ros a lot. (look at the xmlbuildsystem branch that speeds up the compilation a lot) Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

2 1

Voting
by Casper Hornstrup 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

I don't think we've ever formalised our voting procedures. All I seem to remember about this is that committers can vote. I've drafted an initial version here: http://reactos.com/wiki/index.php/Voting Please comment on that. Casper

6 6

Re: [ros-svn] [weiden] 14007: - fixed handle table structures
by James Tabor 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

Hi! weiden(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > - fixed handle table structures > - implement generic executive handle tables (since there don't exist documents that describe the parameters of most of these functions (which are kernel internal only), i made them up as required) > - adjusted OB's handle manager to use ex handle tables > - adjusted the client id manager to use ex handle tables > > > Added files: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/handle.c > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/config > trunk/reactos/include/ddk/kefuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ntos/obtypes.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/Makefile > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/init.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/sysinfo.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ex.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ob.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ps.h > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/iomgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/close.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ob/object.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/cid.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/create.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/idle.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/kill.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/thread.c > trunk/reactos/subsys/win32k/misc/object.c > rossym: [CC] initkm.c In file included from ../../include/ntos.h:90, from ../../include/roskrnl.h:2, from initkm.c:11: ../../include/ntos/obtypes.h:122: warning: redefinition of `PHANDLE_TABLE' ../../w32api/include/ddk/ntifs.h:472: warning: `PHANDLE_TABLE' previously declared here make[1]: *** [initkm.o] Error 1 make: *** [rossym] Error 2 Humm 8^/ ???, James

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution of ROS through XDCC Bot.
by Steven Edwards 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

--- Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > [ ] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS through the #ros-xdcc > channel and ROS-XDCC-001 bot. (support and encourage this distribution) > > [X] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS, but it must clearly > distance itself from officially supported releases (tolerate but do not > support this distribution) Yes but only if they are using a binary published by reactos.org or a core ReactOS developer such as Thomas's nightly builds. If they are not doing so then my vote is no. At the first offence we should warn them and then at the 2nd offence we should deny the use of the ReactOS name > [ ] No, only sourceforge and other official ReactOS distribution points > should be used. We cannot stop distrabution of the OS. Only the use of the name. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

2 1

Re: [ros-svn] [royce] 14018: -Wall -Werror and fix warnings
by James Tabor 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

Hi Royce, royce(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > -Wall -Werror and fix warnings > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/Makefile > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/hash.c > trunk/reactos/tools/widl/write_msft.c > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > More crazy Linux port problems, in /reactos/tools/widl, write_msft.c: In function `ctl2_write_chunk': write_msft.c:2189: warning: implicit declaration of function `write' write_msft.c:2190: warning: implicit declaration of function `close' write_msft.c: In function `save_all_changes': write_msft.c:2284: warning: implicit declaration of function `creat' make: *** [write_msft.o] Error 1 It works when removing -Werror -Wall from the Makefile. BTW io.h is in the /usr/mingw32/include directory. Thanks, James

2 2

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14000: Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines.
by Thomas Weidenmueller 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines. > > You implementation is better, no doubt, but it wouldn't have mattered to read it twice or more. I mean, it's re-read again down in the InterlockedExchange call, there's a possibility it might have been changed in the meantime as well. But it really wouldn't matter ;) Best Regards, Thomas

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev