Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5789 discussions

Bug#492 - Nvidia " IoConnectInterrupt" - Conflict with RTL8139 driver

by Gge

Hello, After disabling the realtek8139 driver in hivesys.inf , the Nvidia driver can load successfully . Log of the boot available at : http://edou4ever.free.fr/gge/reactos/Nvidia_irq_log_without_RTL8139.txt Please may somebody help on this problem ? Best regards Gerard

20 years, 3 months

RE: [ros-dev] Registry and ObjectManager (was FreeLdr Part II)

by Steven Edwards

Hi Casper, --- Casper Hornstrup <ch(a)csh-consult.dk> wrote: > Basicly we have the following situation (and please correct me if I'm wrong). Hartmut spends > some time examining the registry and > object manager problems. Alex has partially rewritten the object manager to fix the problems, > but can't get get further because he > needs to wait for Thomas to finish his handle table implementation. Meanwhile, Thomas seems to > be doing everything but finishing his > handle table implementation. Alex keeps an increasing number of bugfixes (not only bugfixes for > the object manager) on his private > miscelanea branch and thus keeping these bugfixes away from 25 developers and whatever number of > testers we have. The 25 developers > and testers will have to live with these bugs until the branch is merged to trunk which appears > to be several weeks away. Hartmut > seems to be willing to fix the object manager and registry manager bugs on trunk, but if he now > did, he would be duplicating work. I agree 100%. I wanted to branch to 0.2.6 but because these fixes are still not on the trunk I cannot do that. If the fixes are not merged on the trunk so then I propose we go ahead and branch it for 0.2.6 and let the testers have at it. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

20 years, 3 months

[Fwd: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 13895: Fix failure case in IoConnectInterrupt. - Nvidia driver crash

by Gge

Filip, I do not know if this patch is related to my nvidia driver 66.93 crash (interrupt registration conflict) but i tested it and no change ... To remember about this problem , i created the bug #522 => May I have feedback from Nvidia users ? Note : The driver version 43.45 worked ok several months ago on my video card. Regards Gerard

20 years, 3 months

french sysdm translation and some fixes in rc files

by Sylvain Petreolle

french sysdm translation and some fixes in rc files Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

20 years, 3 months

Userland services

by art yerkes

What are our current options for creating userland services in reactos? We don't seem to have an svchost, so should I make my service a standalone exe for now? Is anybody working on service support? -- Here's a simple experiment. Stand on a train track between two locomotives which are pushing on you with equal force in opposite directions. You will exhibit no net motion. None the less, you may soon begin to notice that something important is happening. -- Robert Stirniman

20 years, 3 months

wrc.exe and widl.exe for download

by Boaz Harrosh

Sorry to be nudging about this but: Will the newly ported wrc.exe & widl.exe be a part of the binutils (Binary & Source) packages available on SourceForge.net ReactOS project? Free Life Boaz

20 years, 3 months

Assertion in /objects/dc.c

by dolphin_＠gmx.net

Hello! I have just updates to the latest SVN version and now I have the problem, that I cannot install ReactOS anymore. At the first reboot after installation, I get the following Assertion (cut from debug output): (devinst.c:1008:SetupDiInstallClassW) Assertion 'NewDC->DMW.dmBitsPerPel == BitsPerFormat(SurfObj->iBitmapFormat)' fai led at objects/dc.c line 808 Entered debugger on embedded INT3 at 0x0008:0x80006243. When I ignore this Assertion (by continuing), I can do so serveral times, after that my PC reboots. The error occurs on both QEMU and real HW. I guess this error has something to do with the latest changes. Perhaps someone can verify/fix this (GvG ?). I discoverd one or two other problems too (that have nothing to do with the latest SVN build), but I have to recheck them to ensure they still exist. This is what I've done: I have clicked wildly with the right mouse button on the Desktop background to open the context menu and randomly used the context menu of the Explorer to move the Explorer windows arround in between. When I do this for a couple of seconds, ReactOS crashes. (I posted a BSOD yesterday in IRC, but I guess nobody noticed it, here is the link: http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/kxur3L28.html As I said, I will recheck this in the evening today. Perhaps someone else will have a look on this too. Best regards, Dolphin

20 years, 3 months

new build system: informal performance test

by Royce Mitchell III

each test was run from a "mingw32-make clean" or "make clean" tree with KDBG=0 DBG=0 old build system build command: mingw32-make mingw32-make bootcd 21 minutes new build system: make bootcd 11 minutes new build system: make -j 5 bootcd 13 minutes I built the old build system with two separate commands because last time I tried, you could do a "mingw32-make bootcd" from a clean tree. So, besides the other benefits outlined when we started this project, the new build system is cutting build time in half. Now to just fix the remaining bug(s) ;)

20 years, 4 months

Proposed change to usermode exception reporting

by art yerkes

I want to change the usermode exception reporter to make stack traces in this form: (KERNEL32:except/except.c:184) 6dc00000+cb991 C:\dl\libgtk-0.dll rather than this from: (KERNEL32:except/except.c:184) 6dccb991 C:\dl\libgtk-0.dll My form is less compact but gives more information (namely, the offset in the target module). It's a simple change but I wanted to see if anyone objected strongly. -- Here's a simple experiment. Stand on a train track between two locomotives which are pushing on you with equal force in opposite directions. You will exhibit no net motion. None the less, you may soon begin to notice that something important is happening. -- Robert Stirniman

20 years, 4 months

0.2.6 branch

by Steven Edwards

Hi, Robert if you are out there I think we want to try to branch for 0.2.6 sometime in the middle of the coming week. Alex is going to merge his changes in to the trunk and then we should be mostly ready. If Robert is not free and no one else wants to do it then I will plan on branching on Wednesday. I expect we can let the 0.2.6 branch run for about a week so lets plan on shipping 0.2.6-final on 2005/03/16. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

20 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev