Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5791 discussions

Release builds are back
by Pierre Schweitzer 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

Hi, release builds will finally be available again. Those will be daily built against most recent head. They will be findable at usual place. For the moment, no new release build is available since release build its broken (cf: http://build.reactos.org/builders/Trunk_x86_GCCLin%20Release/builds/1/steps…). With my best regards, -- Pierre Schweitzer<pierre(a)reactos.org> System Administrator ReactOS Foundation

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 56043: [NEWCC] - Turn NewCC on temporarily for some testing - Patchbot is broken so I had to do it this way :(‏
by Pierre Schweitzer 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Nice try! However it failed on KVM: http://build.reactos.org/builders/Linux_AMD64_1% 20KVM-CMake-Test/builds/255/steps/test/logs/stdio Regards, -- Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org> Systems Administrator ReactOS Foundation

3 2

Fwd: buildbot failure in ReactOS on CMake_x86_GCCWin Debug
by caemyr＠myopera.com 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Could it be a ccache miss? Failed to read source file: 0 mingw32-make.exe[3]: *** [boot/freeldr/freeldr/frldr16.bin] Error -4 [ 98%] [ 98%] mingw32-make.exe[2]: *** [boot/freeldr/freeldr/CMakeFiles/freeldr.dir/all] Error 2 mingw32-make.exe[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... ----- Original message ----- From: buildbot(a)reactos.org To: caemyr(a)myopera.com Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:03:52 +0000 Subject: buildbot failure in ReactOS on CMake_x86_GCCWin Debug The Buildbot has finished a build on builder CMake_x86_GCCWin Debug while building ReactOS. Full details are available at: http://build.reactos.org/builders/CMake_x86_GCCWin%20Debug/builds/2966 Buildbot URL: http://build.reactos.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Windows_AMD64_1 Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp: 56010 Blamelist: sir_richard BUILD FAILED: failed building bootcd sincerely, -The Buildbot -- With best regards Caemyr

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 55978: [STORAGE] - Back by popular demand, the storage driver to end all storage drivers, uniata! - I had forgotten how many issues atapi had itself and the hardware compatibility improve...‏
by Pierre Schweitzer 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hi, this revision actually fixed KVM testbot (ie r55980 was not mandatory). But this has been hidden by two things: - sysreg regression: this has been kicked out by now; - trunk regression: introduced by r55977, it is still present. And results couldn't be sent to testman since rosautotest got messed up and ran same tests several times; Sorry for the issues caused by sysreg regression. With my best regards, -- Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org> Systems Administrator ReactOS Foundation

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] buildbot failure in ReactOS on CMake_x86_MSVCWin Debug
by caemyr＠myopera.com 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

Cabman error, build was restarted and went fine On Sat, Mar 3, 2012, at 08:26 PM, buildbot(a)reactos.org wrote: > The Buildbot has finished a build on builder CMake_x86_MSVCWin Debug > while building ReactOS. > Full details are available at: > http://build.reactos.org/builders/CMake_x86_MSVCWin%20Debug/builds/596 > > Buildbot URL: http://build.reactos.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: Windows_AMD64_1a > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: 55970 > Blamelist: tkreuzer > > BUILD FAILED: failed building bootcd > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > -- With best regards Caemyr

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-builds] Linux_AMD64_1 KVM-CMake-Test: build failed
by Pierre Schweitzer 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

This is due to an issue within both ReactOS and sysreg. ReactOS appears not to boot any longer with r55879 on KVM, and crashing during ntoskrnl init on CD. Sysreg is also not catching the crash, nor hitting the timeout and so is not killing the VM. And then, buildbot is unable to start any new test due to the frozen VM. I have killed the frozen VM and restarted HEAD (ie, r55886 testing). If the fix has been really committed with r55880, it should work properly. Will investigate the issue ASAP, to ensure it doesn't happen any more. Le lundi 27 février 2012 à 17:40 +0000, buildbot(a)reactos.org a écrit : > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder Linux_AMD64_1 KVM-CMake-Test while building ReactOS. > Full details are available at: > http://build.reactos.org/builders/Linux_AMD64_1%20KVM-CMake-Test/builds/76 > > Buildbot URL: http://build.reactos.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: Linux_AMD64_1 > > Build Reason: Triggerable(Linux_AMD64_1 KVM-CMake-Test Trigger) > Build Source Stamp: 55886 > Blamelist: ion > > BUILD FAILED: failed test > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > -- Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org> Systems Administrator ReactOS Foundation

1 1

Re: [ros-dev] buildbot failure in ReactOS on CMake_x86_MSVCWin Debug
by caemyr＠myopera.com 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

Cabman failure. Repeated. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012, at 10:24 PM, buildbot(a)reactos.org wrote: > The Buildbot has finished a build on builder CMake_x86_MSVCWin Debug > while building ReactOS. > Full details are available at: > http://build.reactos.org/builders/CMake_x86_MSVCWin%20Debug/builds/566 > > Buildbot URL: http://build.reactos.org/ > > Buildslave for this Build: Windows_AMD64_1a > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: 55939 > Blamelist: khornicek > > BUILD FAILED: failed building bootcd > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > -- With best regards Caemyr

1 0

Cmake result differences
by Bernd Blaauw 01 Mar '12

01 Mar '12

I was wondering why the Cmake results are different between the Windows/ReactOS and Unix/Linux platforms. The compressed trunk CD images available for download differ by about 6MB. Expecting identical output (checksums, file sizes) on different platforms even with the same compiler isn't realistic ofcourse but above mentioned 6MB is a bit much. Creating dbgwin-builds makes sense, but if the Unix builder builds faster and smaller builds, and makes them earlier available for download, what's the point in making the Windows build available publicly? Would it make more sense to offer MSVC builds if license-technical allowed? Or automated builds of CLT-type (combined installCD + liveCD) ? Bernd

5 8

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 55943: Party revert r55722: "[CSRSRV]: Some misc cleanup of dead code. No functional change.", which caused MSVC builds to hang on 2nd stage
by Alex Ionescu 01 Mar '12

01 Mar '12

Uhhh.... While I'm happy you have MSVC working again.... it's kind of weird this is fixing it for you? Does the DPRINT1 show up? -- Best regards, Alex Ionescu On 2012-03-01, at 6:17 AM, tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: tkreuzer > Date: Thu Mar 1 14:17:23 2012 > New Revision: 55943 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=55943&view=rev > Log: > Party revert r55722: "[CSRSRV]: Some misc cleanup of dead code. No functional change.", which caused MSVC builds to hang on 2nd stage > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/subsystems/win32/csrss/csrss.c > > Modified: trunk/reactos/subsystems/win32/csrss/csrss.c > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/subsystems/win32/csrss/csr… > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/reactos/subsystems/win32/csrss/csrss.c [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/subsystems/win32/csrss/csrss.c [iso-8859-1] Thu Mar 1 14:17:23 2012 > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ > { > KPRIORITY BasePriority = (8 + 1) + 4; > NTSTATUS Status; > - ULONG Response; > + //ULONG Response; > UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(envp); > UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(DebugFlag); > > @@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ > { > /* Raise a hard error */ > DPRINT1("CSRSS: Could not raise IOPL: %x\n", Status); > +#if 0 > Status = NtRaiseHardError(STATUS_IO_PRIVILEGE_FAILED, > 0, > 0, > NULL, > OptionOk, > &Response); > +#endif > } > > /* Initialize CSR through CSRSRV */ > >

1 0

Rasberry Pi
by Ged Murphy 29 Feb '12

29 Feb '12

It looks like the model B boards are now in manufacture. http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/509 There are only 10k being made being made in this batch and demand is really high, so I doubt they'll last longer than a few minutes. With only 256MB RAM available, I doubt Windows 8 will ever run on it although Windows Embedded Compact 7 might. I know the reactos arm port is still a way off, but this could be a golden opportunity for reactos. At $25 per computer, they're gonna sell hundreds of thousands of these things and most buyers will be enthusiasts/developers. Ged.

18 38

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev