Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

1 participants
5790 discussions

by Sylvain Petreolle

Feel free to open a bug. ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com> À : ros-dev(a)reactos.org Envoyé le : Jeudi, 21 Août 2008, 22h47mn 20s Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Ros-dev Digest, Vol 48, Issue 14 Not to mention that makex is not 100% functional, for example i cannot perform makex depends or even makex bootcd on a clean tree. I have to first do make depends, then makex bootcd. 2008/8/21 <ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org> Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to ros-dev(a)reactos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org You can reach the person managing the list at ros-dev-owner(a)reactos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. (gedmurphy) 2. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. (Timo Kreuzer) 3. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. (Colin Finck) 4. Has anyone given any thought to coding so that the OS can use the GPU (Matthew Therault) 5. Re: Has anyone given any thought to coding so that the OS can use the GPU (Steven Edwards) 6. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. (Aleksey Bragin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:59:42 +0100 From: "gedmurphy" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. To: <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> Message-ID: <000f01c902bc$3ea137f0$bbe3a7d0$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I don't want make to consume both CPU's. Ged. -----Original Message----- From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of dreimer(a)svn.reactos.org Sent: 20 August 2008 10:10 To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org Subject: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. Author: dreimer Date: Wed Aug 20 04:10:07 2008 New Revision: 35473 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35473&view=rev Log: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. Modified: trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] Ros-dev Digest, Vol 48, Issue 14

by Olaf Siejka

Not to mention that makex is not 100% functional, for example i cannot perform makex depends or even makex bootcd on a clean tree. I have to first do make depends, then makex bootcd. 2008/8/21 <ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org> > Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to > ros-dev(a)reactos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ros-dev-owner(a)reactos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves > like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept > for now to keep compatible. (gedmurphy) > 2. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves > like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept > for now to keep compatible. (Timo Kreuzer) > 3. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves > like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept > for now to keep compatible. (Colin Finck) > 4. Has anyone given any thought to coding so that the OS can use > the GPU (Matthew Therault) > 5. Re: Has anyone given any thought to coding so that the OS can > use the GPU (Steven Edwards) > 6. Re: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves > like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept > for now to keep compatible. (Aleksey Bragin) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:59:42 +0100 > From: "gedmurphy" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically > behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. > makex > kept for now to keep compatible. > To: <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> > Message-ID: <000f01c902bc$3ea137f0$bbe3a7d0$@com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I don't want make to consume both CPU's. > > Ged. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] > On Behalf Of dreimer(a)svn.reactos.org > Sent: 20 August 2008 10:10 > To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org > Subject: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex > when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep > compatible. > > Author: dreimer > Date: Wed Aug 20 04:10:07 2008 > New Revision: 35473 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35473&view=rev > Log: > make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core > now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. > > Modified: > trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd > trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible.

by gedmurphy

I don't want make to consume both CPU's. Ged. -----Original Message----- From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of dreimer(a)svn.reactos.org Sent: 20 August 2008 10:10 To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org Subject: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 35473: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. Author: dreimer Date: Wed Aug 20 04:10:07 2008 New Revision: 35473 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35473&view=rev Log: make automatically behaves like makex when there is more then one CPU Core now. makex kept for now to keep compatible. Modified: trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac Modified: trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Bui… ============================================================================== --- trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd [iso-8859-1] (original) +++ trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Build.cmd [iso-8859-1] Wed Aug 20 04:10:07 2008 @@ -103,11 +103,20 @@ ) :: +:: Get the number of CPUs in the system so we know how many jobs to execute. +:: To modify the number used alter the options used with cpucount: +:: No Option - Number of CPUs. +:: -x1 - Number of CPUs, plus 1. +:: -x2 - Number of CPUs, doubled. +:: -a - Determine the cpu count based on the inherited process affinity mask. +:: +for /f "usebackq" %%i in (`"%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\cpucount.exe" -x1`) do set CPUCOUNT=%%i +:: :: Check if we are using -j or not. :: -if "%1" == "multi" ( - if not "%2" == "" ( - title 'makex %2' parallel build started: %TIMERAW% +if %CPUCOUNT% GTR 2 ( + if not "%1" == "" ( + title 'makex %1' parallel build started: %TIMERAW% ) else ( title 'makex' parallel build started: %TIMERAW% ) @@ -139,27 +148,17 @@ goto :EOF :BUILDMULTI - :: - :: Get the number of CPUs in the system so we know how many jobs to execute. - :: To modify the number used alter the options used with cpucount: - :: No Option - Number of CPUs. - :: -x1 - Number of CPUs, plus 1. - :: -x2 - Number of CPUs, doubled. - :: -a - Determine the cpu count based on the inherited process affinity mask. - :: - for /f "usebackq" %%i in (`"%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\cpucount.exe" -x1`) do set CPUCOUNT=%%i - if %_ROSBE_SHOWTIME% == 1 ( if %_ROSBE_WRITELOG% == 1 ( - "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\buildtime.exe" "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 2>&1 | "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\tee.exe" "%_ROSBE_LOGDIR%\BuildLog-%_ROSBE_GCCVERSION%-%DATENAME%-%TIMENAME%.txt" + "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\buildtime.exe" "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %* 2>&1 | "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\tee.exe" "%_ROSBE_LOGDIR%\BuildLog-%_ROSBE_GCCVERSION%-%DATENAME%-%TIMENAME%.txt" ) else ( - "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\buildtime.exe" "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 + "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\buildtime.exe" "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %* ) ) else ( if %_ROSBE_WRITELOG% == 1 ( - "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 2>&1 | "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\tee.exe" "%_ROSBE_LOGDIR%\BuildLog-%_ROSBE_GCCVERSION%-%DATENAME%-%TIMENAME%.txt" + "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %* 2>&1 | "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Tools\tee.exe" "%_ROSBE_LOGDIR%\BuildLog-%_ROSBE_GCCVERSION%-%DATENAME%-%TIMENAME%.txt" ) else ( - "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 + "%_ROSBE_MINGWMAKE%" -j %CPUCOUNT% %* ) ) goto :EOF Modified: trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/Ros… ============================================================================== --- trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac [iso-8859-1] (original) +++ trunk/tools/RosBE/RosBE-Windows/Root/RosBE.mac [iso-8859-1] Wed Aug 20 04:10:07 2008 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ENV = set HELP = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Help.cmd" $* MAKE = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Build.cmd" $* -MAKEX = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Build.cmd" multi $* +MAKEX = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\Build.cmd" $* RADDR2LINE = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\reladdr2line.cmd" $* RENV = for /f "usebackq tokens=*" %i in (`set _ROSBE_`) do @echo %i SCUT = "%_ROSBE_BASEDIR%\scut.cmd" $*

17 years

Has anyone given any thought to coding so that the OS can use the GPU

by Matthew Therault

Just a random thought wondering if anyone else has thought about it. They are making great strides into how the GPU can now be used as a processor. -- Two men walk into a bar....... Third one ducks.... Think about it, it will come to you. :P

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 35458: Move some architecture specific code from KiRosPrepareForSystemStartup into KiArchInitSystem, defined for each architecture. Enable KiRosBuildReservedMemoryMap for _M_AMD64

by Alex Ionescu

Please rename the function to KiFreeLdrHackKiArchHackHack or something like that, and move it away from cpu.c, somewhere like i386/freeldr.c to make clear that this function has NOTHING TO DO with how NT should boot and is a hack because FreeLDR is a piece of shit that nobody seems to want to fix. On 19-Aug-08, at 12:07 PM, tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: tkreuzer > Date: Tue Aug 19 14:07:13 2008 > New Revision: 35458 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35458&view=rev > Log: > Move some architecture specific code from > KiRosPrepareForSystemStartup into KiArchInitSystem, defined for each > architecture. Enable KiRosBuildReservedMemoryMap for _M_AMD64 > > Modified: > branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/freeldr.c > branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/i386/cpu.c > branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/powerpc/cpu.c > > Modified: branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/freeldr.c > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntosk… > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > --- branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/freeldr.c > [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/freeldr.c > [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug 19 14:07:13 2008 > @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ > /* Build entries for ReactOS memory ranges, which uses ARC > Descriptors */ > KiRosBuildOsMemoryMap(); > > -#ifdef _M_IX86 > +#if defined(_M_IX86) || defined(_M_AMD64) > /* Build entries for the reserved map, which uses ARC > Descriptors */ > KiRosBuildReservedMemoryMap(); > #endif > @@ -1266,42 +1266,15 @@ > { > PLOADER_PARAMETER_BLOCK NtLoaderBlock; > ULONG size, i = 0, *ent; > -#if defined(_M_IX86) > - PKTSS Tss; > - PKGDTENTRY TssEntry; > - > - /* Load the GDT and IDT */ > - > Ke386SetGlobalDescriptorTable(*(PKDESCRIPTOR)&KiGdtDescriptor.Limit); > - > Ke386SetInterruptDescriptorTable > (*(PKDESCRIPTOR)&KiIdtDescriptor.Limit); > - > - /* Initialize the boot TSS */ > - Tss = &KiBootTss; > - TssEntry = &KiBootGdt[KGDT_TSS / sizeof(KGDTENTRY)]; > - TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Type = I386_TSS; > - TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Pres = 1; > - TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Dpl = 0; > - TssEntry->BaseLow = (USHORT)((ULONG_PTR)Tss & 0xFFFF); > - TssEntry->HighWord.Bytes.BaseMid = (UCHAR)((ULONG_PTR)Tss >> 16); > - TssEntry->HighWord.Bytes.BaseHi = (UCHAR)((ULONG_PTR)Tss >> 24); > -#endif > - > -#if defined(_M_PPC) > - // Zero bats. We might have residual bats set that will > interfere with > - // our mapping of ofwldr. > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > - { > - SetBat(i, 0, 0, 0); SetBat(i, 1, 0, 0); > - } > - KiSetupSyscallHandler(); > - DbgPrint("Kernel Power (%08x)\n", LoaderBlock); > - DbgPrint("ArchExtra (%08x)!\n", LoaderBlock->ArchExtra); > -#endif > > /* Save pointer to ROS Block */ > KeRosLoaderBlock = LoaderBlock; > > /* Get debugging function */ > FrLdrDbgPrint = LoaderBlock->FrLdrDbgPrint; > + > + /* Per architecture initialisazion code */ > + KiArchInitSystem(); > > /* Save memory manager data */ > KeMemoryMapRangeCount = 0; > > Modified: branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/i386/cpu.c > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntosk… > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > --- branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/i386/cpu.c > [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/i386/cpu.c > [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug 19 14:07:13 2008 > @@ -1036,3 +1036,24 @@ > /* Capture the control state */ > KiSaveProcessorControlState(State); > } > + > +VOID > +KiArchInitSystem() > +{ > + PKTSS Tss; > + PKGDTENTRY TssEntry; > + > + /* Load the GDT and IDT */ > + > Ke386SetGlobalDescriptorTable(*(PKDESCRIPTOR)&KiGdtDescriptor.Limit); > + > Ke386SetInterruptDescriptorTable > (*(PKDESCRIPTOR)&KiIdtDescriptor.Limit); > + > + /* Initialize the boot TSS */ > + Tss = &KiBootTss; > + TssEntry = &KiBootGdt[KGDT_TSS / sizeof(KGDTENTRY)]; > + TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Type = I386_TSS; > + TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Pres = 1; > + TssEntry->HighWord.Bits.Dpl = 0; > + TssEntry->BaseLow = (USHORT)((ULONG_PTR)Tss & 0xFFFF); > + TssEntry->HighWord.Bytes.BaseMid = (UCHAR)((ULONG_PTR)Tss >> 16); > + TssEntry->HighWord.Bytes.BaseHi = (UCHAR)((ULONG_PTR)Tss >> 24); > +} > > Modified: branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/powerpc/cpu.c > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntosk… > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > --- branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/powerpc/cpu.c > [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ branches/ros-amd64-bringup/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/powerpc/cpu.c > [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug 19 14:07:13 2008 > @@ -275,3 +275,19 @@ > /* Capture the control state */ > KiSaveProcessorControlState(State); > } > + > +VOID > +KiArchInitSystem() > +{ > + ULONG i; > + > + // Zero bats. We might have residual bats set that will > interfere with > + // our mapping of ofwldr. > + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > + { > + SetBat(i, 0, 0, 0); SetBat(i, 1, 0, 0); > + } > + KiSetupSyscallHandler(); > + DbgPrint("Kernel Power (%08x)\n", KeRosLoaderBlock); > + DbgPrint("ArchExtra (%08x)!\n", KeRosLoaderBlock->ArchExtra); > +} > Best regards, Alex Ionescu

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cfinck] 34290: Remove the strsafe library, it was imported from a dubious source, which is incompatible with the LGPL

by Gregor Gullwi

I know this is an old changelist, but do we have any plans on re-implementing this lib by hand? -Gregor cfinck(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: cfinck > Date: Fri Jul 4 03:24:37 2008 > New Revision: 34290 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=34290&view=rev > Log: > Remove the strsafe library, it was imported from a dubious source, which is incompatible with the LGPL > > Removed: > trunk/reactos/include/psdk/strsafe.h > trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/strsafe/ > Modified: > trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/sdk.rbuild > > Removed: trunk/reactos/include/psdk/strsafe.h > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/include/psdk/strsafe.h?rev… > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/reactos/include/psdk/strsafe.h [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/include/psdk/strsafe.h (removed) > @@ -1,454 +1,0 @@ > -/* > - * STRSAFE > - * > - * Copyright 2007 Dmitry Chapyshev <dmitry(a)reactos.org> > - * > - * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > - * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > - * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > - * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > - * > - * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > - * Lesser General Public License for more details. > - * > - * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > - * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > - * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA > - */ > -#ifndef _STRSAFE_H_INCLUDED_ > -#define _STRSAFE_H_INCLUDED_ > - > -#ifdef __cplusplus > -#define _STRSAFE_EXTERN_C extern "C" > -extern "C" { > -#else > -#define _STRSAFE_EXTERN_C extern > -#endif > - > -#include <string.h> > -#include <stdarg.h> > -#include <stdio.h> > -#include <windows.h> > - > -#define STRSAFE_INLINE_API __inline HRESULT __stdcall > -#define STRSAFEAPI _STRSAFE_EXTERN_C HRESULT __stdcall > - > -#ifndef _NTSTRSAFE_H_INCLUDED_ > - > -#define STRSAFE_MAX_CCH 2147483647 > - > -#define STRSAFE_FILL_BEHIND_NULL 0x00000200 > -#define STRSAFE_IGNORE_NULLS 0x00000100 > -#define STRSAFE_FILL_ON_FAILURE 0x00000400 > -#define STRSAFE_NULL_ON_FAILURE 0x00000800 > -#define STRSAFE_NO_TRUNCATION 0x00001000 > -#define STRSAFE_IGNORE_NULL_UNICODE_STRINGS 0x00010000 > -#define STRSAFE_UNICODE_STRING_DEST_NULL_TERMINATED 0x00020000 > - > -#define STRSAFE_VALID_FLAGS (0x000000FF | STRSAFE_IGNORE_NULLS | STRSAFE_FILL_BEHIND_NULL | STRSAFE_FILL_ON_FAILURE | STRSAFE_NULL_ON_FAILURE | STRSAFE_NO_TRUNCATION) > -#define STRSAFE_UNICODE_STRING_VALID_FLAGS (STRSAFE_VALID_FLAGS | STRSAFE_IGNORE_NULL_UNICODE_STRINGS | STRSAFE_UNICODE_STRING_DEST_NULL_TERMINATED) > -#define STRSAFE_FILL_BYTE(x) ((unsigned long)((x & 0x000000FF) | STRSAFE_FILL_BEHIND_NULL)) > -#define STRSAFE_FAILURE_BYTE(x) ((unsigned long)((x & 0x000000FF) | STRSAFE_FILL_ON_FAILURE)) > -#define STRSAFE_GET_FILL_PATTERN(dwFlags) ((int)(dwFlags & 0x000000FF)) > - > -#endif /* _NTSTRSAFE_H_INCLUDED_ */ > - > -#define STRSAFE_E_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER ((HRESULT)0x8007007AL) > -#define STRSAFE_E_INVALID_PARAMETER ((HRESULT)0x80070057L) > -#define STRSAFE_E_END_OF_FILE ((HRESULT)0x80070026L) > - > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatNA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchMaxAppend); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatNW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchMaxAppend); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatNExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchMaxAppend, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCatNExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchMaxAppend, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyNA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyNW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyNExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchCopyNExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cchSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCchGetsA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCchGetsW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCchGetsExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCchGetsExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchVPrintfA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCTSTR pszFormat, > - va_list argList); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchVPrintfW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPCWSTR pszFormat, > - va_list argList); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchVPrintfExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags, > - LPCTSTR pszFormat, > - va_list argList); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchVPrintfExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cchDest, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcchRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags, > - LPCWSTR pszFormat, > - va_list argList); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchLengthA(LPCTSTR psz, > - size_t cchMax, > - size_t* pcch); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCchLengthW(LPCWSTR psz, > - size_t cchMax, > - size_t* pcch); > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS */ > - > -/* CB */ > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCatA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCatW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCatExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCatExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyNA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cbSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyNW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cbSrc); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyNExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cbSrc, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbCopyNExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszSrc, > - size_t cbSrc, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCbGetsA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCbGetsW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCbGetsExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFE_INLINE_API > -StringCbGetsExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbPrintfA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCTSTR pszFormat, > - ...); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbPrintfW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPCWSTR pszFormat, > - ...); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbPrintfExA(LPTSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPTSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags, > - LPCTSTR pszFormat, > - ...); > - > -STRSAFEAPI > -StringCbPrintfExW(LPWSTR pszDest, > - size_t cbDest, > - LPWSTR *ppszDestEnd, > - size_t* pcbRemaining, > - unsigned long dwFlags, > - LPCWSTR pszFormat, > - ...); > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS */ > - > -#ifdef UNICODE > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS > -#define StringCchCat StringCchCatW > -#define StringCchCatEx StringCchCatExW > -#define StringCchCatN StringCchCatNW > -#define StringCchCatNEx StringCchCatNExW > -#define StringCchCopy StringCchCopyW > -#define StringCchCopyEx StringCchCopyExW > -#define StringCchCopyN StringCchCopyNW > -#define StringCchCopyNEx StringCchCopyNExW > -#define StringCchGets StringCchGetsW > -#define StringCchGetsEx StringCchGetsExW > -#define StringCchPrintf StringCchPrintfW > -#define StringCchPrintfEx StringCchPrintfExW > -#define StringCchVPrintf StringCchVPrintfW > -#define StringCchVPrintfEx StringCchVPrintfExW > -#define StringCchLength StringCchLengthW > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS */ > - > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS > -#define StringCbCat StringCbCatW > -#define StringCbCatEx StringCbCatExW > -#define StringCbCatN StringCbCatNW > -#define StringCbCatNEx StringCbCatNExW > -#define StringCbCopy StringCbCopyW > -#define StringCbCopyEx StringCbCopyExW > -#define StringCbCopyN StringCbCopyNW > -#define StringCbCopyNEx StringCbCopyNExW > -#define StringCbGets StringCbGetsW > -#define StringCbGetsEx StringCbGetsExW > -#define StringCbPrintf StringCbPrintfW > -#define StringCbPrintfEx StringCbPrintfExW > -#define StringCbVPrintf StringCbVPrintfW > -#define StringCbVPrintfEx StringCbVPrintfExW > -#define StringCbLenght StringCbLenghtW > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS */ > - > -#else > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS > -#define StringCchCat StringCchCatA > -#define StringCchCatEx StringCchCatExA > -#define StringCchCatN StringCchCatNA > -#define StringCchCatNEx StringCchCatNExA > -#define StringCchCopy StringCchCopyA > -#define StringCchCopyEx StringCchCopyExA > -#define StringCchCopyN StringCchCopyNA > -#define StringCchCopyNEx StringCchCopyNExA > -#define StringCchGets StringCchGetsA > -#define StringCchGetsEx StringCchGetsExA > -#define StringCchPrintf StringCchPrintfA > -#define StringCchPrintfEx StringCchPrintfExA > -#define StringCchVPrintf StringCchVPrintfA > -#define StringCchVPrintfEx StringCchVPrintfExA > -#define StringCchLength StringCchLengthA > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CCH_FUNCTIONS */ > - > -#ifndef STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS > -#define StringCbCat StringCbCatA > -#define StringCbCatEx StringCbCatExA > -#define StringCbCatN StringCbCatNA > -#define StringCbCatNEx StringCbCatNExA > -#define StringCbCopy StringCbCopyA > -#define StringCbCopyEx StringCbCopyExA > -#define StringCbCopyN StringCbCopyNA > -#define StringCbCopyNEx StringCbCopyNExA > -#define StringCbGets StringCbGetsA > -#define StringCbGetsEx StringCbGetsExA > -#define StringCbPrintf StringCbPrintfA > -#define StringCbPrintfEx StringCbPrintfExA > -#define StringCbVPrintf StringCbVPrintfA > -#define StringCbVPrintfEx StringCbVPrintfExA > -#define StringCbLenght StringCbLenghtA > -#endif /* STRSAFE_NO_CB_FUNCTIONS */ > -#endif /* UNICODE */ > - > -#ifdef __cplusplus > -} > -#endif /* cplusplus */ > - > -#endif /* _STRSAFE_H_INCLUDED_ */ > > Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/sdk.rbuild > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/sdk.rbuild?rev=342… > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/sdk.rbuild [iso-8859-1] (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/sdk.rbuild [iso-8859-1] Fri Jul 4 03:24:37 2008 > @@ -23,7 +23,4 @@ > <directory name="scrnsave"> > <xi:include href="scrnsave/scrnsave.rbuild" /> > </directory> > - <directory name="strsafe"> > - <xi:include href="strsafe/strsafe.rbuild" /> > - </directory> > </group> > >

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 35346: PE symbol dumper. It's not finished, functions don't work and the type output doesn't always look 100% correct. But it does it's job. You need dbghelp.dll and symsrv.dll from windbg.

by Steven Edwards

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, <tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote: > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35346&view=rev > Log: > PE symbol dumper. It's not finished, functions don't work and the type output doesn't always look 100% correct. But it does it's job. You need dbghelp.dll and symsrv.dll from windbg. You could also import winedump. -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 35359: The TEB member is called ClientID not Cid on all Windows versions I could check (XP, 2k3, vista).

by Aleksey Bragin

Please merge this change to trunk too, if NDK author does not object. WBR, Aleksey Bragin. On Aug 16, 2008, at 3:40 AM, tkreuzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: tkreuzer > Date: Fri Aug 15 18:40:42 2008 > New Revision: 35359 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=35359&view=rev > Log: > The TEB member is called ClientID not Cid on all Windows versions I > could check (XP, 2k3, vista).

17 years

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-web] Developer blog

by Zachary Gorden

I'd rather pester you to finish work on your SEH paper and translation of parts of your thesis. On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:31 AM, KJK::Hyperion <hackbunny(a)reactos.org>wrote: > Zachary Gorden ha scritto: > > However, there may be developers who do not wish to maintain > > their own blog or want to keep their ROS bloggings separate and want to > > make use of the system integrated in the CMS. Any thoughts? > > Do both (aggregator AND blog platform). Then pester me to blog > _______________________________________________ > Ros-web mailing list > Ros-web(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-web >

17 years

Developer blog

by Zachary Gorden

Sending this to both mailing lists as I don't know how many developers are actually subscribed to the web list. For some time now, the blog on the ReactOS site hasn't been used. When I asked if Aleksey was against putting up a "preview" of sorts on the front page in an attempt to revive it, some of the developers such as Ged pointed out no one really used it anymore and a few already had their own blogs and didn't want to maintain two. Ged has already moved to remove the link in the quick menu, though no formal decision has been made yet (the link is still there until a refresh occurs, though we might end up restoring it anyways). I personally believe the blog could be quite useful, even if its current form changes. An alternative would be an aggregation of the RSS feeds from the blogs maintained by each ROS developer, assuming they have a blog. However, there may be developers who do not wish to maintain their own blog or want to keep their ROS bloggings separate and want to make use of the system integrated in the CMS. Any thoughts?

17 years

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev