Ros-diffs May 2006

ros-diffs@reactos.org
  • 19 participants
  • 377 discussions

[amunger] 21846: userenv: open handles with least rights neccessary. Patch by w3seek, bug 1458.
by amunger@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[ekohl] 21845: The NPFS_FCB struct is actually a CCB (Context Control Block) instead of an FCB (File Control Block). Rename it accordingly and store pointers to it in FileObject->FsContext2 instead of FileObject->FsContext.
by ekohl@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[ion] 21844: [AUDIT] - Tditest: A TDI test application. - Floppy: Cleanly implemented by Vizzini. - VideoPort, VBE/VGA Miniports: Filip says these are clean, but the actual VGA driver/framebuffers need more through auditing.
by ion@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[greatlrd] 21843: [AUDIT] after looking through code no signs of reverse engineering were found.
by greatlrd@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[ion] 21842: [AUDIT] - Bootvid: Uses documented/typical VGA drawing routines. Actual NT implementation is comletely incompatible and has nothing to do with real Windows, so no taint here. - Debugout, green, diskdump: ROS-developed and non-NT drivers. Nothing they could've been tainted with, since NT doesn't have them. - Null: Trivial/obvious implementation of a driver which does nothing. - buslogic: Taken from VMWare source code almost entirely, minus some ROS hacks. - Xbox Video Miniport: Clean
by ion@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[ion] 21841: [AUDIT] - HalUp is just a 3-line initialization stub. - Include directory contains public DMA/APIC/SMP hardware data or internal prototypes.
by ion@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[ion] 21840: [AUDIT] - Generic HAL is just a bunch of stubs, no actual code. - XBOX HAL was cleanly developed by the ros-XBOX team using information from linux-xbox.
by ion@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[greatlrd] 21839: bug 1457: patch by w3seek : VFAT: Implement FileEaInformation for FAT32
by greatlrd@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[greatlrd] 21838: [AUDIT] after looking through code no signs of reverse engineering were found.
by greatlrd@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months

[greatlrd] 21837: [AUDIT] after looking through code no signs of reverse engineering were found.
by greatlrd@svn.reactos.org
18 years, 4 months
Results per page: