https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=commitdiff;h=fcb156388d88eb6c09498…
commit fcb156388d88eb6c0949890fde6d0efe19f00deb
Author: Bișoc George <fraizeraust99(a)gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 26 12:11:29 2020 +0100
Commit: Thomas Faber <thomas.faber(a)reactos.org>
CommitDate: Sat Mar 28 13:10:44 2020 +0100
[NTDLL_APITEST] Add testcase for process priority class. CORE-16757
Currently the testcase function only addresses the behaviour of getting an
unaligned buffer (either of correct length size or not) for now.
---
.../apitests/ntdll/NtQueryInformationProcess.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/modules/rostests/apitests/ntdll/NtQueryInformationProcess.c
b/modules/rostests/apitests/ntdll/NtQueryInformationProcess.c
index bdbfc3f726a..e392ead8760 100644
--- a/modules/rostests/apitests/ntdll/NtQueryInformationProcess.c
+++ b/modules/rostests/apitests/ntdll/NtQueryInformationProcess.c
@@ -185,6 +185,74 @@ Test_ProcessTimes(void)
#undef SPIN_TIME
}
+static
+void
+Test_ProcessPriorityClassAlignment(void)
+{
+ NTSTATUS Status;
+ PPROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS ProcPriority;
+
+ /* Allocate some memory for the priority class structure */
+ ProcPriority = malloc(sizeof(PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS));
+ if (ProcPriority == NULL)
+ {
+ skip("Failed to allocate memory for PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS!\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize the PriorityClass member to ensure the test won't randomly succeed
(if such data is uninitialized).
+ * Filling 85 to the data member makes sure that if the test fails continously then
NtQueryInformationProcess()
+ * didn't initialize the structure with data.
+ */
+ RtlFillMemory(&ProcPriority->PriorityClass,
sizeof(ProcPriority->PriorityClass), 0x55);
+
+ /* Unaligned buffer -- wrong size */
+ Status = NtQueryInformationProcess(NtCurrentProcess(),
+ ProcessPriorityClass,
+ (PVOID)1,
+ 0,
+ NULL);
+ ok_hex(Status, STATUS_INFO_LENGTH_MISMATCH);
+
+ /* Unaligned buffer -- correct size */
+ Status = NtQueryInformationProcess(NtCurrentProcess(),
+ ProcessPriorityClass,
+ (PVOID)1,
+ sizeof(PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS),
+ NULL);
+ ok_hex(Status, STATUS_DATATYPE_MISALIGNMENT);
+
+ /* Unaligned buffer -- wrong size (but this time do with an alignment of 2) */
+ Status = NtQueryInformationProcess(NtCurrentProcess(),
+ ProcessPriorityClass,
+ (PVOID)2,
+ 0,
+ NULL);
+ ok_hex(Status, STATUS_INFO_LENGTH_MISMATCH);
+
+ /* Unaligned buffer -- correct size (but this time do with an alignment of 2) */
+ Status = NtQueryInformationProcess(NtCurrentProcess(),
+ ProcessPriorityClass,
+ (PVOID)2,
+ sizeof(PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS),
+ NULL);
+ ok_hex(Status, STATUS_DATATYPE_MISALIGNMENT);
+
+ /* Do not care for the length but expect to return the priority class */
+ Status = NtQueryInformationProcess(NtCurrentProcess(),
+ ProcessPriorityClass,
+ ProcPriority,
+ sizeof(PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS),
+ NULL);
+ ok_hex(Status, STATUS_SUCCESS);
+
+ /* Make sure the returned priority class is a valid number (non negative) but also it
should be within the PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS range */
+ ok(ProcPriority->PriorityClass > PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS_INVALID &&
ProcPriority->PriorityClass <= PROCESS_PRIORITY_CLASS_ABOVE_NORMAL,
+ "Expected a valid number from priority class range but got %d\n",
ProcPriority->PriorityClass);
+ free(ProcPriority);
+}
+
START_TEST(NtQueryInformationProcess)
{
NTSTATUS Status;
@@ -193,4 +261,5 @@ START_TEST(NtQueryInformationProcess)
ok_hex(Status, STATUS_SUCCESS);
Test_ProcessTimes();
+ Test_ProcessPriorityClassAlignment();
}